<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:17 PM David Davis <<a href="mailto:daviddavis@redhat.com">daviddavis@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:03 PM Justin Sherrill <<a href="mailto:jsherril@redhat.com" target="_blank">jsherril@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div>On 7/28/20 11:44 AM, David Davis wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Today we discussed this at triage. We're leaning
        towards changing the default from 20 to 10 as it seems like 10
        only incurs an extra 30% penalty in time while seeming to fix
        the problem[0].
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>One question though is how we should treat existing data
          because most Remotes at this point probably have a value of 20
          for download_concurrency. We came up with two options that we
          would like some feedback on.</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>It seems kinda strange that the 'default' value is recorded in
      the db on the remote at creation time.  Any reason to just leave
      it 'nil' and use the 'app default' ?   This doesn't really help
      with past values, but seems like a better model going forward.</p></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I think this maybe makes sense given that we'll potentially have to change it again if we find out that 10 doesn't work for some reason. Perhaps we could set a class constant on Remote that subclasses could override.</div></div></div></blockquote><div>One benefit of what we have now is that if you get a db dump, you can see all the data right there. One downside of what we have now is that we can't disambiguate a user intending to use the default from just receiving the default. Overall I value the simplicity of recording actual values in the db because it's simple, explicit, and consistent with how all other defaults work in Pulp.<br></div><div> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div># Option 1: Migrate 20 to 10</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>This would be a migration in pulpcore that would update
          download_concurrency to 10 for all Remotes whose
          download_concurrency is set to 10. Something like:</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div> 
  Remote.objects.all().filter(download_concurrency=20).update(download_concurrency=10)</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>My vote is for #1 because:</p>
    <p>a) I imagine ~99% of people want the recommended default, so 99%
      of people will either need to update this manually (if doing #2)
      or face sync failures</p>
    <p>b) i'd rather 99% of people not have to do anything than the 1%
      that for some reason actually wanted 20 and weren't just going
      with the 'recommended default' at that time.  The number of people
      in this case could very well be zero.<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div># Option 2: Documentation</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>This would be similar to the migration approach but instead
          of modifying our users' data, we'd document how they could do
          it themselves. So something like:</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>    pulpcore-manager shell_plus -c
"Remote.objects.all().filter(download_concurrency=20).update(download_concurrency=10)</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Any feedback is welcome.<br>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>[0] <a href="https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7186#note-2" target="_blank">https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7186#note-2</a><br>
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div>
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div dir="ltr">
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                          <div>David</div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 2:57
          PM Grant Gainey <<a href="mailto:ggainey@redhat.com" target="_blank">ggainey@redhat.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr">Hey folks,
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Looking into issue <a href="https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7212" target="_blank">7212</a> , over the weekend I did
              some ad-hoc evaluations of sync-performance at various
              concurrency settings. I wrote up my observations here:</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><a href="https://hackmd.io/@ggainey/pulp3_sync_concurrency" target="_blank">https://hackmd.io/@ggainey/pulp3_sync_concurrency</a><br>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Just thought folk might be interested.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>G</div>
              -- <br>
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div>
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div>Grant Gainey</div>
                      <div>Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System
                        Management Engineering</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          Pulp-dev mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com" target="_blank">Pulp-dev@redhat.com</a><br>
          <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
<a href="mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com" target="_blank">Pulp-dev@redhat.com</a>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
Pulp-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com" target="_blank">Pulp-dev@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Pulp-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pulp-dev@redhat.com" target="_blank">Pulp-dev@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>