<div dir="ltr">Well then, here is a PR for your collective review: <a href="https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/2188">https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/2188</a><div><br></div><div>Michael</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Sean Myers <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sean.myers@redhat.com" target="_blank">sean.myers@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 11/23/2015 12:04 PM, Michael Hrivnak wrote:<br>
</span><span class="">> Following up on this: <a href="https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/2067/files" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/2067/files</a><br>
><br>
</span>> <snip><br>
<span class="">><br>
> Thoughts? Perhaps those who have been heavily involved in the mongoengine<br>
> conversion already have considered this.<br>
<br>
</span>this++, timezones--<br>
<br>
I hate naive datetime objects, and I think the 'UTCDateTime' name gets<br>
the point across perfectly. I also agree that shifting tz-aware<br>
datetimes to UTC is a good thing for UTCDateTime to do.<br>
<br>
I also think that not having timezones on datetime objects by convention<br>
goes against PEP 20, and could lead to some strange bugs down the road.<br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Pulp-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pulp-list@redhat.com">Pulp-list@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>