<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'> I am looking for recommendations on what release of Pulp is recommended for production deployments. We have been running Pulp 2.3 in production for the past year and are currently building out new production infrastructure to deploy our new production Pulp environment on top of. We planned to deploy the latest stable release of Pulp which at the time was Pulp version 2.8.3. We have Pulp 2.8.3 running on the new infra and are currently dealing with various pulp tasks hanging with State: Waiting and Start Time: Unstarted I've noticed that the Katello project has recently upgraded their stable release (3.0 currently) to use Pulp 2.8.4 packages located here: <a href="https://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/releases/yum/3.0/pulp/el7/x86_64/">https://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/releases/yum/3.0/pulp/el7/x86_64/</a> And previously Pulp 2.6 was used as the stable packages for Katello (skipping Pulp 2.7 altogether). For production deployments is Pulp 2.8.x the recommended release to use, or should people be deploying Pulp 2.9.x in prod, or just skip Pulp 2.9.x and use for devel environments only? Hopefully this question makes sense to you. It would be nice if the Pulp project had some sort of LTS release (Long Term Support) to help guide users to the most stable branch of development. <div> </div> </body></html>