<div dir="ltr">We have one feature planned which should be helpful in your case.<div>See this thread <a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/2020-January/msg00031.html">https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/2020-January/msg00031.html</a> and more details on the issue <a href="https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5613">https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5613</a>.</div><div><br></div><div>Any feedback or suggestions are welcome,</div><div>Tanya</div><div><div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 7:39 PM Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) <<a href="mailto:bli111@bloomberg.net">bli111@bloomberg.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="white-space:pre-wrap;font-size:small;font-family:"Courier New",Courier,"BB.FixedWidth"">Hi All<div>We sync repo from upstream only on our pulp server. We don't upload any packages locally.  In case of filesystem corruption of /var/lib/pulp, is it possible to sync the data back given the postgres database is intact?<div><br></div><div>Thanks</div></div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
Pulp-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pulp-list@redhat.com" target="_blank">Pulp-list@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list</a></blockquote></div>