Calling this the first Packstack release would be unfair. Going with version 8.0.0 follows the RPM packaging versions Packstack already has in RDO. It was 7 for Liberty. Bonus points for being the same major version as the Puppet modules it heavily relies on. David Moreau Simard Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] <div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 20, 2016 4:26 PM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" <<a href="mailto:ihrachys@redhat.com">ihrachys@redhat.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Martin Mágr <<a href="mailto:mmagr@redhat.com" target="_blank">mmagr@redhat.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> CC'ing rdo-list On 03/18/2016 04:23 PM, Martin Mágr wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Greetings guys, I think that it's time to finally start tagging packstack upstream releases as David now needs that. This task has been in TODO list for several releases already and was always thrown away from radar with low priority. I'd like us to agree on a tagging workflow. David suggested first tag "<dmsimard> I wanted to tag 8.0.0b1", so IIUC to follow OpenStack upstream milestones (eg. Mitaka beta1 -> 8.0.0b1 ?). Has anybody something against that scheme? </blockquote></blockquote> Any reason why you start from 8, not 1 [which would indicate it’s the first packstack release]? Ihar </blockquote></div>