[redhat-lspp] Re: RHEL5 Kernel with labeled networking

[Linda Knippers]

James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Eric Paris wrote:
> 
> 
>>I think there is going to need to be a policy change that I'm actually
>>talking with Dan about as I type this e-mail.  I think we  need
>>
>>allow $1 unlabeled_t:packet { flow_in flow_out };
>>
>>to be added to policy to allow things to work as they did.  I'll post
>>again as soon as we have a policy that appears to let normal networking
>>work in enforcing.
> 
> 
> We need this policy in rawhide before the kernel patches are merged 
> upstream, so we can note the required policy version associated with the 
> patches.  We've do not want to kill Andrew Morton's box again with this 
> kind of thing.

Dumb question....should compat_net be "1" by default?

-- ljk