[redhat-lspp] Re: MLS enforcing PTYs, sshd, and newrole

[Stephen Smalley]

On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 09:04 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Saturday 28 October 2006 01:36, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:00:28 +1000, Russell Coker said:
> > > On Thursday 19 October 2006 23:21, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> 
> wrote:
> > > > If we then remove -l from newrole we are done?
> > >
> > > Why remove it?  Why not just cease using it and leave it there for other
> > > people who have different needs?
> >
> > I suspect that it wouldn't fly during an eval, because even if unused, it
> 
> OK.
> 
> Well #if 0 would still be better than removing the code.  This is something we 
> may want to resurrect at a later time.

It isn't being removed, at least not upstream.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency