<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
I concur. What if we set up a <a href="mailto:rhelv7-list@anotherdomain.com">rhelv7-list@anotherdomain.com</a>? I’m thinking Red Hat might get the hint if a bunch of us subscribe to this list and start discussing the new release. :)
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>/Brian/<br>
<div apple-content-edited="true">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<div><font face="Courier New">-- </font></div>
<div><font face="Courier New"> Brian Long | |</font></div>
<div><font face="Courier New"> Research Triangle Park, NC . | | | . | | | .</font></div>
<div><font face="Courier New"> ' '</font></div>
<div><font face="Courier New"> C I S C O</font></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div>
<div>On Apr 22, 2014, at 8:55 AM, francis picabia <<a href="mailto:fpicabia@gmail.com">fpicabia@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">My response on this topic is an observation for which I think many of you<br>
can concur.<br>
Mailing lists include informed replies, and are usually answered.<br>
Forums tend to include misinformed responses, silly solutions<br>
like "I installed Gentoo and the problem went away", and postings with no<br>
replies.<br>
My all time favourite is the posting with the exact problem you've seen and<br>
the<br>
OP simply posts: "never mind, the problem is resolved".<br>
<br>
For example, if I google a problem and a link for a match is pointing to<br>
Ubuntu forums,<br>
I don't even bother looking at it - the quality is so low, and so many<br>
postings are unresolved.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:56 AM, solarflow99 <<a href="mailto:solarflow99@gmail.com">solarflow99@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">I think a separate list for EL7 may not really be necessary, but I sure<br>
hope mailing lists will continue, I'd really hate to see that go.<br>
<br>
When I look at forums, there's a lot of activity in Fedora, I guess the<br>
younger generation prefers not using email as much? :)<br>
The ML's have always been more of a keeping in touch with things for me,<br>
rather than a than a tool to search for bugs/solutions<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Bryan J Smith <<a href="mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org">b.j.smith@ieee.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">I do not speak for anyone but m myself, a 20 year Linux Professional<br>
involved with many projects.<br>
<br>
All I stated is that capture and reuse works very well via other avenues.<br>
Mailing lists get more limiting, and consistently revisit issues, at<br>
10-25K+ users. Sun and Linux Managers mitigate this with a reply<br>
off-list/Summary on-list approach.<br>
<br>
Although I did find it humorous when at least two individuals stated they<br>
did not care for Bugzilla. Kinda made my point for me. ;)<br>
On Apr 18, 2014 11:34 AM, "R P Herrold" <<a href="mailto:herrold@owlriver.com">herrold@owlriver.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014, Eugene Vilensky wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Forgive me for not reading the entirety of last-year's discussion on<br>
the issue, but is it fair statement at this point that Red Hat, Inc.<br>
won't be hosting a new mailing list for RHEL7 specific discussion?<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo">http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
The 'trailhead' for that discussion was over here:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-beta-list/2013-December/thread.html">https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-beta-list/2013-December/thread.html</a><br>
<br>
and I came away with the conclusion that at Least Bryan J<br>
Smith (for whom I have great respect in some matters) who is<br>
at Red Hat) was strongly advocating for a migration to other<br>
support venue<br>
<br>
Problem as I see it is that some such venue do ,and some do<br>
not leave 'breadcrumbs' that others can follow and read, and<br>
major search engines find hidden nuggets in. The thread<br>
petered out, and as you remark, no list for '7' (assuming for<br>
the sake of argument that which will be its name) has appeared<br>
<br>
Also the Red Hat acquisition and rework of the formerly<br>
independent CentOS communication venue seems substantially<br>
complete. A later post also cites dissappointment as to<br>
information density<br>
<br>
No big deal. I would rather light a candle than curse the<br>
darkness. This will be my only post here on this matter<br>
<br>
Please feel free to join the mailing list at:<br>
http://lists.clefos.org/mailman/listinfo/enterpriseseven-list<br>
if you are interested in the approach of an independent<br>
mailing list on the next major enterprise OS product (binary<br>
and 'from sources' rebuilds) from our host. I would hope to<br>
run it with civility and to stay close on topic. As need<br>
admits, additional lists are of course possible, but by and<br>
large, I hope that the RHEL and CentOS mailing lists venues<br>
will suffice for the next major release<br>
<br>
- -- Russ herrold<br>
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)<br>
<br>
iEYEARECAAYFAlNRb/UACgkQMRh1QZtklkSW5QCfZtVVgn84xOtcpa2+gnScQere<br>
MUkAn3f3sXo3pb+SOCWBjafYxNeJOeki<br>
=/H4O<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rhelv6-beta-list mailing list<br>
rhelv6-beta-list@redhat.com<br>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-beta-list<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rhelv6-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rhelv6-list@redhat.com">rhelv6-list@redhat.com</a><br>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rhelv6-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rhelv6-list@redhat.com">rhelv6-list@redhat.com</a><br>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________<br>
rhelv6-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rhelv6-list@redhat.com">rhelv6-list@redhat.com</a><br>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>