[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RH Taroon Beta Open Ports
- From: Paul Jakma <paul dishone st>
- To: rhl-devel-list <rhl-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: RH Taroon Beta Open Ports
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 04:24:35 +0100 (IST)
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> favor. NFS is not very secure by nature (except NFSv4).
hmm... just to but in, but the above is a common myth:
- whatever security problems NFS has, they are /not/ the fault of the
NFS
- connection authorisation/transport security are /not/ within the
remit of NFS, it is the /RPC/ layer which is responsible.
- NFSv4 is /not/ more secure than NFSv3. However, NFSv4 makes secure
RPC mechanisms mandatory. NB: NFSv3 will (should) be able to avail of
this too.
anyway, blame RPC and the lack of secure RPC mechs in glibc/linux -
not NFS, if authunix is the only mech available, then authunix is
all NFS can make use of.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul clubi ie paul jakma org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to spam dishone st
Fortune:
There's no easy quick way out, we're gonna have to live through our
whole lives, win, lose, or draw.
-- Walt Kelly
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]