[Rhm-users] load balancing
Carl Trieloff
cctrieloff at redhat.com
Tue Jul 22 00:44:42 UTC 2008
yes, but be careful, the federation link will then act as 'one consumer'
With federation a bunch of consumers essentially hide behind that link.
That would be
the case just about any typology with federation...
what are you trying to do? I might be able to provide better answers
with a bit more context.
regards
Carl.
Andrew M wrote:
>
> Will that work with a queue shared across federated brokers?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Carl Trieloff [mailto:cctrieloff at redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 21, 2008 10:32 AM
> *To:* Andrew M
> *Cc:* rhemrg-users-list at redhat.com; rhm-users at redhat.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Rhm-users] load balancing
>
>
>
>
>
> Multiple consumers on a single queue will share the messages from that
> queue, i.e. first
> consumer gets first message, next consumer gets next message etc...
>
> Carl.
>
>
> Andrew M wrote:
>
> Does MRG support any type round robin message distribution across
> multiple queues?
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rhm-users mailing list
> Rhm-users at redhat.com <mailto:Rhm-users at redhat.com>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhm-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/rhm-users/attachments/20080721/a00b2d12/attachment.htm>
More information about the Rhm-users
mailing list