From ptalbert at redhat.com  Wed Aug  7 02:39:39 2013
From: ptalbert at redhat.com (Patrick Talbert)
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 22:39:39 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [Scap-security-guide] test
Message-ID: <655342505.10444970.1375843179214.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>

test



From shawn at redhat.com  Wed Aug  7 02:43:28 2013
From: shawn at redhat.com (Shawn Wells)
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 22:43:28 -0400
Subject: [Scap-security-guide] Testing
Message-ID: <5201B450.2020406@redhat.com>

Testing



From shawn.d.wells at gmail.com  Wed Aug  7 02:45:22 2013
From: shawn.d.wells at gmail.com (Shawn Wells)
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 22:45:22 -0400
Subject: [Scap-security-guide] Testing
In-Reply-To: <5201B450.2020406@redhat.com>
References: <5201B450.2020406@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <5201B4C2.2040902@gmail.com>

On 8/6/13 10:43 PM, Shawn Wells wrote:
> Testing 
testing from non-subscribed EMail



From shawn at redhat.com  Wed Aug  7 02:52:26 2013
From: shawn at redhat.com (Shawn Wells)
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 22:52:26 -0400
Subject: [scap-security-guide] test 2
In-Reply-To: <5201B4C2.2040902@gmail.com>
References: <5201B450.2020406@redhat.com> <5201B4C2.2040902@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5201B66A.60208@redhat.com>

testing lowercase "Scap"



From shawn at redhat.com  Wed Aug  7 02:59:09 2013
From: shawn at redhat.com (Shawn Wells)
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 22:59:09 -0400
Subject: [scap-security-guide] welcome!
Message-ID: <5201B7FD.2090200@redhat.com>

Alas, we now have an @redhat.com EMail list.

Should we keep the EMail subject tag, or perhaps shorten it to [ssg]?