<html><body><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><hr id="zwchr"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><div class="moz-cite-prefix">Looks like it finally works: Here are the key lines from my spec file: <tt>%global pymajor %(python -c 'import sys; print "%s" % sys.version_info[0]')</tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global pyminor %(python -c 'import sys; print "%s" % sys.version_info[1]')</tt><tt> </tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global uses_systemd %(test -f /usr/lib/systemd/systemd && echo 1 || echo 0)</tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global python27_native %(test %{pyminor} -ge 7 && echo 1 || echo 0)</tt><tt> </tt><tt>%if %{python27_native}</tt><tt> </tt><tt>%else</tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global scl_python python27</tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global scl %{scl_python}</tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global _scl_root /opt/rh/%{scl_python}/root</tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global __python %{_scl_root}%{__python}</tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global scl_prefix %{scl_python}-</tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global __python_requires %{%{scl_python}_python_requires} </tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global __python_provides %{%{scl_python}_python_provides} </tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global __os_install_post %{python27_os_install_post}</tt><tt> </tt><tt>%global python_sitearch %{_scl_root}/%{_libdir}/python2.7/site-packages</tt> <tt>%endif</tt> I've attached the whole thing for your reading pleasure. The only thing I defined that I didn't really need was the scl_python. I could have used scl, but thought scl_python was clearer. Note that you have to define more or less all the other things in the else condition of that if statement. </div></blockquote><div>Hi Alan, </div><div>thanks for sharing this! I'm sorry that I couldn't reply to your mails last week, but I was attending a conference and was otherwise occupied.</div><div>The reason why you hit these obstacles is that your usecase is slightly different from what SCLs are supposed to do - making non-SCL packages depend on SCL packages is not standard (not at this moment, but I guess that can be subject to change over time). From what I see, you hit so many obstacles because you basically had to redo a great portion of RPM macro magic that I did for Python SCLs. And that feels kinda iffy, at least in the start. </div><div>Again, thanks for sharing this and feel free to reach out next time, too - I hope I'll be more responsive than this time :) </div><div>Slavek </div><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><div class="moz-cite-prefix"> On 07/18/2014 01:03 PM, Alan Robertson wrote: </div><blockquote cite="mid:53C96F7F.3000608@unix.sh"><div class="moz-cite-prefix">Next error - not sure what to do about this one... + scl enable python27 '/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-bytecompile-with-scl-python /usr/bin/python 1 %{_scl_root}' Compiling /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/opt/rh/python27/root/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/assimilation/assimcli.py ... SyntaxError: ('invalid syntax', ('/opt/rh/python27/root/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/assimilation/assimcli.py', 157, 22, "options = {'language', 'format'}\n")) Compiling /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/opt/rh/python27/root/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/assimilation/cmaconfig.py ... SyntaxError: ('invalid syntax', ('/opt/rh/python27/root/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/assimilation/cmaconfig.py', 42, 53, " {'linkdiscovery', # listens for CMA/LLDP packets\n")) [This syntax is >= 2.7 python only] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.FIkESm (%install) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.FIkESm (%install) <blockquote>scl enable python27 '/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-bytecompile-with-scl-python /usr/bin/python 1 %{_scl_root</blockquote> It is using /usr/bin/python to compile my python 2.7 programs. What's up with that? On 07/18/2014 11:15 AM, Alan Robertson wrote: </div><blockquote cite="mid:53C9564E.3080806@unix.sh">Next error: extracting debug info from /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/usr/sbin/nanoprobe 1376 blocks + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-scl-compress '%{_scl_root}' + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + scl enable %scl '/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-bytecompile-with-scl-python /usr/bin/python 1 %{_scl_root}' Unable to open /etc/scl/prefixes/%scl! error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eqUbD6 (%install) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eqUbD6 (%install) I'm guessing need to define %scl. It looks to me like these macros expect that you're *defining* a package, not using one. Good thing I don't need more than one, or I'd be in a world of hurt (which is how it feels now anyway). On 07/18/2014 11:10 AM, Alan Robertson wrote: <blockquote>On 07/16/2014 02:30 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: <blockquote>That's correct. The problem here is, I think, that the package places it's files into sitearch of the SCL, but it's not actually an SCL package. One of the results of having it as non-SCL package means, that %scl_package_override() function, present in the python27-build subpackage doesn't get invoked. This function looks like this (you need to 's/@scl@/python27/'): # override __os_install_post for this collection # the python27_os_install_post macro is defined in macros.python2.python27 in python27-python-devel # the name is intentionally hardcoded to always provide the same name %scl_package_override() %{expand:%{?@scl@_os_install_post:%global __os_install_post %@scl@_os_install_post} %global __python_requires %@scl@_python_requires %global __python_provides %@scl@_python_provides </blockquote> This looks like it has a typo in it. If @scl@ is python27, then %global __python_requires %@scl@_python_requires becomes %global __python_requires python27_python_requires and %global __python_provides %@scl@_python_provides becomes %global __python_provides python27_python_provides Why is the original spelled with two underscores ("__python_requires") but the replacement name ("python27_python_requires") only has one underscore? This seems a bit inconsistent... It looks correct, but inconsistent... I see that the python27_python_requires macro is defined in /etc/rpm/macros.python2.python27. I see that __python_requires is defined in the file /usr/lib/rpm/macros. The definition of python27_python_requires is: %python27_python_provides /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps-scl.sh --provides %{?scl_prefix} %python27_python_requires /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps-scl.sh --requires %{?scl_prefix} So, it expects you to set scl_prefix. I set it to "python27-" From what I can see in the macro definitions, that's what I expect it would want. Well, at least now I get different problems! + install -p -D -m0755 /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/etc/init.d/cma /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/etc/rc.d/init.d/assimilation-cma + install -p -D -m0755 /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/etc/init.d/nanoprobe /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/etc/rc.d/init.d/assimilation-nanoprobe + rm -f /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/etc/init.d/cma /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/etc/init.d/nanoprobe + mkdir -p /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/var/run/assimilation + mkdir -p /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/var/run/nanoprobe + mkdir -p /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/usr/lib64 + mkdir -p /rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/assimilation-cma-0.1.4-0.30.x86_64/opt/rh/python27/root//usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/assimilation/testcode + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-scl-compress '%{_scl_root}' /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.uQBlOW: line 59: /usr/lib/rpm/brp-scl-compress: No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.uQBlOW (%install) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.uQBlOW (%install) Looks like that should come from scl-utils-build... </blockquote> </blockquote> <pre class="moz-signature">-- Alan Robertson <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:alanr@unix.sh" target="_blank"><alanr@unix.sh></a> - @OSSAlanR "Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce </pre> <pre>_______________________________________________ SCLorg mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:SCLorg@redhat.com" target="_blank">SCLorg@redhat.com</a><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg</a></pre></blockquote> <pre class="moz-signature">-- Alan Robertson <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:alanr@unix.sh" target="_blank"><alanr@unix.sh></a> - @OSSAlanR "Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce </pre></blockquote><div> </div><div> </div><div>-- </div><div>Regards, Slavek Kabrda </div></div></body></html>