Some clients we have are running i386, but the Spacewalk server its self is 64-bit, so the client end you may want to keep as 32-bit <div class="gmail_quote">2011/3/24 Miroslav Suchı <<a href="mailto:msuchy@redhat.com">msuchy@redhat.com</a>> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Dear users of Spacewalk, I was thinking about dropping i386 architecture for Spacewalk server. Client tools will be still build and released for i386. But servers itself not. All current HW is 64bit but Atoms. And Atom is not the best choice for Spacewalk. So I do not see reason for i386. But before I head shot i386 architecture, I'm asking: Does somebody use i386 architecture? If yes can you migrate to x86_64? Will you miss i386 architecture? I anticipate that a lots of people will not miss i386 architecture, so please reply only if you will miss it. Even better if you will write your story, why you can not use x86_64. -- Miroslav Suchy Red Hat Satellite Engineering _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list <a href="mailto:Spacewalk-list@redhat.com">Spacewalk-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list</a> </blockquote></div>