Thanks for the answer,<br>but which rpms are noarch, as i see not all the rpm are noarch. Do you mean the rpm used by spacewalk are noarch if yes, what's the name of those rpm.<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/3/19 Jan Pazdziora <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jpazdziora@redhat.com" target="_blank">jpazdziora@redhat.com</a>></span><br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:37:31PM +0100, Issam Harrathi wrote:<br>
> in the wiki here:<br>
> <a href="https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/HowToInstall" target="_blank">https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/HowToInstall</a><br>
><br>
> we install the repo for x86_64 : It's OK my hardware is x86_64<br>
><br>
</div>> *rpm -Uvh <a href="http://yum.spacewalkproject.org/1.9/RHEL/5/x86_64/spacewalk-repo-1.9-1.el5.noarch.rpm*" target="_blank">http://yum.spacewalkproject.org/1.9/RHEL/5/x86_64/spacewalk-repo-1.9-1.el5.noarch.rpm*</a><br>


<div>><br>
> but for EPEL the wiki tell to install the i386 repo? why?<br>
><br>
</div>> *rpm -Uvh <a href="http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm*" target="_blank">http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm*</a><br>
<br>
Both rpms are .noarch.rpm so it does not matter if you get them from<br>
the 32bit or 64bit repo.<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Jan Pazdziora<br>
Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Spacewalk-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Spacewalk-list@redhat.com" target="_blank">Spacewalk-list@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br>