<div dir="ltr">Hey!  It looks like <span>some RPMs in the spacewalk-client repo are 
signed with the "client" key and others are signed with the "server" key . . .  is there a reason for that?<br></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Guy Matz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:guymatz@gmail.com" target="_blank">guymatz@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi!  I'm trying to 'rpm --import' the gpg ky found here:<span><a href="https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/%40spacewalkproject/spacewalk-2.8-client/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">https://copr-be.cloud.<wbr>fedoraproject.org/results/%<wbr>40spacewalkproject/spacewalk-<wbr>2.8-client/</a><br><br></span></div><span>But I still get gpg-related failures when I try to install 2.8 packages, e.g.:<br>Downloading packages:<br>warning: /var/cache/yum/x86_64/7/prod-<wbr>sw-2.8-x86_64/packages/rhn-<wbr>client-tools-2.8.26-1.el7.<wbr>centos.noarch.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID be4b0bc2: NOKEY<br><br><br>Public key for rhn-client-tools-2.8.26-1.el7.<wbr>centos.noarch.rpm is not installed.  Anyone know if this looks right (obviously it isn't):<br># rpm -q gpg-pubkey --qf '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}<wbr>\t%{SUMMARY}\n'  | grep -i spacewalk<br>gpg-pubkey-b8002de1-553126bd  <wbr>  gpg(Spacewalk <<a href="mailto:spacewalk-devel@redhat.com" target="_blank">spacewalk-devel@redhat.com</a>>)<br><br></span></div><span>Anyone have any idea what I might be doing wrong?<br><br></span></div><span>Thanks!<br></span><div><div><span><br><br></span></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>