<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document"> <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14"> <meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 14"> <link rel="File-List" href="cid:filelist.xml@01D4AD9D.38B00F00"><style></style> </head> <body lang="DE-CH" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="tab-interval:35.4pt"> <div class="WordSection1"> Hi Phil,<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I’m using the spacewalk-clone-by-date command and there’s my point of view and experience.<o:p></o:p> I’ve created three channels: dev,test and prod with spacewalk-clone-by-date. Each month in a specific date I resync these three channels with the same commands. In this process errata will be synchronized with their dependencies. <o:p></o:p> All was perfect until I notice that not all packages will be added. By example new package version but not an errata will not be updated. At the end, the channels hasn’t the same packages number has it’s parents. <o:p></o:p> I’ll perhaps make some test with other commands but if you do any more tests on your side, I'll be interested in your results.<o:p></o:p> Unfortunately I didn’t any more informations on web regarding this problematic.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Regards,<o:p></o:p> J�r�me<o:p></o:p> <a name="_MailEndCompose"><o:p> </o:p></a> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm"> From: spacewalk-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of P.Cookson@bham.ac.uk Sent: Dienstag, 15. Januar 2019 14:01 To: spacewalk-list@redhat.com Subject: [Spacewalk-list] Managing Channels/Repositories - Patching Workflow<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> Hi all<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I’ve recently built a SW 2.8 environment, added Channels/Repositories for RHEL/Oracle Linux 6/7 and successfully patched relevant client systems. I now want to know how people are managing their patching workflow – at this point in time I just want to ensure the same group of patches are applied to Dev, Test and Production after sufficient testing has been performed. If I never re-sync these repositories obviously they’ll remain static and could be used for the whole workflow. However, other service areas may want their environments patched at different times with additional patches. I guess I could just create similar Channels/Repositories, at a later time, but that would be time consuming and need more disk space. I’ve seen references to cloning using WebUI, spacecmd -- softwarechannel_clone, spacewalk-clone-by-date or spacewalk-manage-channel-lifecycle and can research these further but just wondering what people have found to be the easiest and most reliable solution really?<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Regards<o:p></o:p> Phil<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> </div> </body> </html>