instruction-analysis API(s)

Masami Hiramatsu mhiramat at redhat.com
Thu Mar 5 02:10:08 UTC 2009


Hi Jim,

Jim Keniston wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 16:20 -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> ...
>> Here are a patch against your code and an example code for
>> instruction length decoder.
>> Curiously, KVM's instruction decoder does not completely
>> cover all instructions(especially, Jcc/test...).
>> I had to refer Intel manuals.
>>
>> Moreover, even with this patch, the decoder is incomplete.
>> - this doesn't cover 3bytes opcode yet.
>> - this doesn't decode sib, displacement and immediate.
>> - might have some bugs :-(
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
> 
> Thanks for your work on this.  Comments below.

Thank you very much for review!

Actually, that code was based on KVM code, so I also found many
opcodes were not supported.

> As I mentioned in private email, you or I should probably refactor this
> into:
> - insn_get_sib()
> - insn_get_displacement()
> - insn_get_immediate()
> - insn_get_length()

Agreed, these should be supported.

I also would like to change struct insn as below;

struct insn {
        struct insn_field prefixes;     /* prefixes.value is a bitmap */
        struct insn_field opcode;       /* opcode.bytes[n] == opcode_n */
        struct insn_field modrm;
        struct insn_field sib;
        struct insn_field displacement;
        union {
                struct insn_field immediate;
                struct insn_field moffset1;     /* for 64bit MOV */
                struct insn_field immediate1;   /* for 64bit imm or off16/32 */
        };
        union {
                struct insn_field moffset2;     /* for 64bit MOV */
                struct insn_field immediate2;   /* for 64bit imm or seg16 */
        };

        u8 opnd_bytes;
        u8 addr_bytes;
        u8 length;
        bool x86_64;

        const u8 *kaddr;        /* kernel address of insn (copy) to analyze */
        const u8 *next_byte;
};

opcode2 and opcode3 will be stored in opcode.value with opcode1.

Now, I'm updating my code. Would anyone also be working on it?

Thank you,

> 
> Jim
> 
>> plain text document attachment (insn_x86.patch)
>> Index: insn_x86.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- insn_x86.h	(revision 1510)
>> +++ insn_x86.h	(working copy)
>> @@ -66,6 +66,10 @@
>>  	struct insn_field displacement;
>>  	struct insn_field immediate;
>>
>> +	u8 op_bytes;
> 
> I'd probably use opnd_bytes and addr_bytes here, for clarity.  (When I
> first saw "op", I thought "opcode".)  Also, we should clarify that these
> are the EFFECTIVE lengths, not the lengths of the immediate and
> displacement fields in the instruction.
> 
>> +	u8 ad_bytes;
>> +	u8 length;
>> +
>>  	const u8 *kaddr;	/* kernel address of insn (copy) to analyze */
>>  	const u8 *next_byte;
>>  	bool x86_64;
>> @@ -75,6 +79,7 @@
>>  extern void insn_get_prefixes(struct insn *insn);
>>  extern void insn_get_opcode(struct insn *insn);
>>  extern void insn_get_modrm(struct insn *insn);
>> +extern void insn_get_length(struct insn *insn);
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>  extern bool insn_rip_relative(struct insn *insn);
>> Index: insn_x86.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- insn_x86.c	(revision 1510)
>> +++ insn_x86.c	(working copy)
>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>>   *
>>   * Copyright (C) IBM Corporation, 2002, 2004, 2009
>>   */
>> -
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>  #include <linux/string.h>
>>  // #include <asm/insn.h>
>>  #include "insn_x86.h"
>> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@
>>  	insn->kaddr = kaddr;
>>  	insn->next_byte = kaddr;
>>  	insn->x86_64 = x86_64;
>> +	insn->op_bytes = 4;
>> +	if (x86_64)
>> +		insn->ad_bytes = 8;
>> +	else
>> +		insn->ad_bytes = 4;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(insn_init);
>>
>> @@ -79,10 +84,51 @@
>>  			break;
>>  		prefixes->value |= pfx;
>>  	}
>> +	if (prefixes->value & X86_PFX_OPNDSZ) {
>> +		/* oprand size switches 2/4 */
>> +		insn->op_bytes ^= 6;
>> +	}
>> +	if (prefixes->value & X86_PFX_ADDRSZ) {
>> +		/* address size switches 2/4 or 4/8 */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> +		if (insn->x86_64)
>> +			insn->op_bytes ^= 12;
>> +		else
>> +#endif
>> +			insn->op_bytes ^= 6;
> 
> This seems wrong.  You're checking the address-size prefix, but
> adjusting the operand size.
> 
>> +	}
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> +	if (prefixes->value & X86_PFX_REXW)
>> +		insn->op_bytes = 8;
>> +#endif
>>  	prefixes->got = true;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(insn_get_prefixes);
>>
>> +static bool __insn_is_stack(struct insn *insn)
> 
> It's not entirely clear to me what this function checks.  (A more
> precise name might help.)  You have pushes, pops, and calls here, but
> you also have some instructions that don't appear to affect the stack at
> all.  And other push and pop instructions are missing.
> 
>> +{
>> +	u8 reg;
>> +	if (insn->opcode.nbytes == 2)
>> +		return 0;
> 
> The following are 2-byte pushes or pops: 0f-a0, 0f-a1, 0f-a8, and 0f-a9.
> 
> Also, since the return value is bool, I'd prefer to see true/false
> rather than 1/0.
> 
>> +
>> +	switch(insn->opcode1) {
>> +	case 0x68:
>> +	case 0x6a:
>> +	case 0x9c:
>> +	case 0x9d:
>> +	case 0xc5:
> 
> 0xc5 = lds.  Why lds?
> 
> In general, it'd be nice to add a comment showing the mnemonic next to
> each hex value -- e.g.,
> 	case 0x68: /* push */
> 
>> +	case 0xe8:
>> +		return 1;
>> +	}
> 
> Other related instructions: 9a, 1f, 07, 17, 8f.
> 
>> +	reg = ((*insn->next_byte) >> 3) & 7;
>> +	if ((insn->opcode1 & 0xf0) == 0x50 ||
>> +	    (insn->opcode1 == 0x1a && reg == 0) ||
> 
> The above line doesn't seem right.  It catches things like
> sbb (%rax),%al .
> 
>> +	    (insn->opcode1 == 0xff && (reg & 1) == 0 && reg != 0)) {
> 
> Looks like the interesting reg values are 2 (call), 3 (call), and 6
> (push).
> 
>> +		return 1;
>> +	}
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /**
>>   * insn_get_opcode - collect opcode(s)
>>   * @insn:	&struct insn containing instruction
>> @@ -108,6 +154,8 @@
>>  		opcode->nbytes = 1;
>>  	opcode->value = insn->opcode1;
>>  	opcode->got = true;
>> +	if (insn->x86_64 && __insn_is_stack(insn))
>> +		insn->op_bytes = 8;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(insn_get_opcode);
>>
>> @@ -208,3 +256,115 @@
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(insn_rip_relative);
>>  #endif
>> +
>> +/**
>> + *
>> + * insn_get_length() - Get the length of instruction
>> + * @insn:	&struct insn containing instruction
>> + *
>> + * If necessary, first collects the instruction up to and including the
>> + * ModRM byte.
>> + */
> 
> As I mentioned in private email, you or I should probably refactor this
> into:
> - insn_get_sib()
> - insn_get_displacement()
> - insn_get_immediate()
> - insn_get_length()
> 
> BTW, I'm going to have to change my definition of insn_field to
> accommodate the 8-byte fields that can be found in instructions like
> a0-a3 (8-byte displacement) and b8-bf (8-byte immediate).
> 
>> +void insn_get_length(struct insn *insn)
>> +{
>> +	u8 modrm;
>> +	u8 mod = 0, reg = 0, rm = 0, sib;
>> +	const u8 *next_byte;
>> +	if (insn->length)
>> +		return;
>> +	if (!insn->modrm.got)
>> +		insn_get_modrm(insn);
>> +	next_byte = insn->next_byte;
> 
> This of course assumes that no fields have been fetched beyond the modrm
> field.
> 
>> +
>> +	if (insn->modrm.nbytes) {
>> +		modrm = insn->modrm.value;
>> +		mod = (modrm & 0xc0) >> 6;
>> +		reg = (modrm & 0x38) >> 3;
>> +		rm = (modrm & 0x07);
> 
> Some comments here would really help -- e.g...
> /*
> Interpreting the modrm byte:
> mod = 00 - no displacement fields (exceptions below)
> mod = 01 - 1-byte displacement field
> mod = 10 - displacement field is 4 bytes, or 2 bytes if
> 	address size = 2 (0x67 prefix in 32-bit mode)
> mod = 11 - no memory operand
> 
> If address size = 2...
> mod = 00, r/m = 110 - displacement field is 2 bytes
> 
> If address size != 2...
> mod != 11, r/m = 100 - SIB byte exists
> mod = 00, SIB base field = 101 - displacement field is 4 bytes
> mod = 00, r/m = 101 - rip-relative addressing, displacement
> 	field is 4 bytes
> */
> 
>> +		if (mod == 3)
>> +			goto decode_src;
>> +		if (insn->ad_bytes == 2) {
>> +			if (mod == 1)
>> +				next_byte++;
>> +			else if (mod == 2)
>> +				next_byte += 2;
>> +			else if (rm == 6)
>> +				next_byte += 2;
>> +		} else {
>> +			if (rm == 4) {
>> +				sib = *(next_byte++);
>> +				insn->sib.value = sib;
>> +				insn->sib.nbytes = 1;
>> +				insn->sib.got = 1;
>> +				if ((sib & 7) == 5 && mod == 0)
>> +					next_byte += 4;
>> +			}
>> +			if (mod == 1)
>> +				next_byte++;
>> +			else if (mod == 2)
>> +				next_byte += 4;
>> +			else if (rm == 5)
>> +				next_byte += 4;
>> +		}
>> +	} else if (insn->opcode.nbytes == 1)
>> +		if (0xa0 <= insn->opcode1 && insn->opcode1 < 0xa4)
> 
> Add comment:
> 			/* Displacement = entire address - up to 8 bytes */
> 
>> +			next_byte += insn->ad_bytes;
>> +decode_src:
> 
> decode_src is a misnomer.  Here we're decoding the immediate operand
> (which is always a source operand, but not the only kind).
> 
>> +	if (insn->opcode.nbytes == 1) {
>> +		switch (insn->opcode1) {
>> +		case 0x05:
>> +		case 0x25:
> 
> What about (hex) 15, 35, 01, 0d, 2d?
> 
>> +		case 0x3d:
>> +		case 0x68: // pushl
>> +		case 0x69: // imul
>> +		case 0x9a: /* long call */
> 
> 0x9a (lcall) seems to have 6 bytes following the opcode, disassembled as
> 2 immediate operands.
> 
>> +		case 0xa9: // test
>> +		case 0xc7:
>> +		case 0xe8:
>> +		case 0xe9:
>> +		case 0xea: /* long jump */
> 
> Similarly, 0xea (ljmp) seems to have 6 bytes following the opcode,
> disassembled as 2 immediate operands.
> 
>> +		case 0x82: /* Group */
> 
> s/82/81/ here.
> 
>> +			goto imm_common;
>> +		case 0x04:
>> +		case 0x24:
> 
> What about (hex) 14, 34, 0c, 1c, 2c?
> 
>> +		case 0x3c:
>> +		case 0x6a: //pushb
>> +		case 0x6b: //imul
>> +		case 0xa8: //testb
>> +		case 0xeb:
>> +		case 0xc0:
>> +		case 0xc1:
>> +		case 0xc6:
>> +		case 0x80: /* Group */
>> +		case 0x81: /* Group */
> 
> s/81/82/ here.
> 
>> +		case 0x83: /* Group */
>> +			goto immbyte_common;
>> +		}
>> +		if ((insn->opcode1 & 0xf8) == 0xb8 ||
> 
> I don't think this is right.  b8-bf can have 8-byte immediate fields
> (with 0x48 prefix).
> 
>> +		    (insn->opcode1 == 0xf7 && reg == 0
> 
> or reg == 1
> 
>> ) ) {
>> +imm_common:
> 
> Jumping into the middle of an if block is ugly, and not necessary here.
> 
>> +			next_byte += (insn->op_bytes == 8) ? 4 : insn->op_bytes;
>> +		} else if ((insn->opcode1 & 0xf8) == 0xb0 || //
>> +			   (insn->opcode1 & 0xf0) == 0x70 || // Jcc
>> +			   (insn->opcode1 & 0xf8) == 0xe0 || // loop/in/out
>> +			    (insn->opcode1 == 0xf6 && reg == 0)) {
>> +immbyte_common:
> 
> Jumping into the middle of an if block is ugly, and not necessary here.
> 
>> +			next_byte++;
>> +		}
> 
> 0xc8 and 0xcd are weird cases that we should handle .
> 
>> +	} else {
>> +		switch (insn->opcode2) {
> 
> Add 0x70.
> 
>> +		case 0xa4:
>> +		case 0xac:
>> +		case 0xba:
>> +		case 0x0f: // 3dnow
>> +		case 0x3a: // ssse3
>> +			next_byte++;
>> +			break;
>> +		default:
>> +			if ((insn->opcode2 & 0xf0) == 0x80)
>> +				next_byte += (insn->op_bytes == 8) ? 4 : insn->op_bytes;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +	insn->length = (u8)(next_byte - insn->kaddr);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(insn_get_length);
>>
> 

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat at redhat.com




More information about the utrace-devel mailing list