[PATCH 54] PTRACE_SINGLESTEP shouldn't bypass SYSCALL_EXIT

Roland McGrath roland at redhat.com
Wed Sep 23 22:45:36 UTC 2009


> However, the current behaviour is that PTRACE_SINGLESTEP acts like
> PTRACE_SYSCALL (but see below), if the tracee is not going to return
> to user-mode yet. Say, PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK.

Not really.  Given what I just wrote, I'm not sure if you want me
to merge these.  I'm sure you'll be changing it entirely and these
look to me to be enough in the wrong direction that they are not
incrementally useful.

My utrace tree is still forked from 2.6.31.  If you want me to merge the
current upstream tree so you get b60e714d folded in, I can do that.


Thanks,
Roland




More information about the utrace-devel mailing list