[PATCH 133] stepping, accommodate to utrace-cleanup changes

[Roland McGrath]

> Yes it does. I am almost sure the bug should be trivial, but
> somehow can't find find it. Just fyi, to ensure this is connected
> to utrace-indirect I applied the hack below and the bug goes away.

Does s/kmem_cache_zalloc/kzalloc/ really have anything to do with it?
Isn't it just the allocation synchronization logic?

> OK. Tomorrow I will just read utrace.c trying to understand the
> details of the new code, perhaps I will notice something.

Ok.  I hope you'll find something not too strange.  But if it takes long,
then probably we should just change utrace_init_task() to eagerly call
utrace_task_alloc() and let you work through other issues first.


Thanks,
Roland