[PATCH 133] stepping, accommodate to utrace-cleanup changes

[Oleg Nesterov]

I'll reply tomorrow, it is to late for me.

But I noticed the funny detail in your email,

On 11/18, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> Yes.  But, hmm.
>
> 		utrace_stop(task, utrace, UTRACE_RESUME); /* XXX */
>
> This XXX was there about passing UTRACE_RESUME, because that's not really
> right.

I didn't notice this XXX marker, but I guess I just sent the patch
which makes this case correct. (of course this patch doesn't fix
the problem we are dicussing in this thread).

Oleg.