gdbstub initial code, v7
Roland McGrath
roland at redhat.com
Fri Sep 10 10:14:52 UTC 2010
> But I meant another case, when the stopped tracee doesn't have siginfo.
> Currently ugdb just sends this signal to tracee, and then it will be
> reported to gdb. Not sure if this is right or not, I can change this.
> (or perhap this doesn't matter, I dunno).
What do you mean by "doesn't have siginfo"? You mean non-signal stops?
What non-signal stops does ugdb report?
Thanks,
Roland
More information about the utrace-devel
mailing list