From f-turgis at ti.com Wed Apr 20 08:00:00 2011 From: f-turgis at ti.com (Turgis, Frederic) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:00:00 +0200 Subject: utrace support on ARM In-Reply-To: <1301412368.24103.46.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> References: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F1460160F8519F@dnce02.ent.ti.com> <1301412368.24103.46.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> Message-ID: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F146016133A83C@dnce02.ent.ti.com> Hi, Let me define the context. We are heavy users of systemtap on OMAP platform on Ubuntu, Android, ... We would like to get user-space dynamic instrumentation capability, which requires uprobes/utrace (doing that in the context of Linaro). This would allow us fully leveraging systemtap capabilities. So I am interested in this kind of status: * utrace has not been accepted upstream. Does it mean it may lose traction ? Is "community" pushing for something else or happy with what they have ? * is someone on this mailing list using uprobes/utrace on ARM ? * I have also found IBM presentation on utrace-less uprobes. How does it affect utrace ? I will check in parallel with systemtap mailing list. Regards Fred Frederic Turgis OMAP Platform Business Unit - OMAP System Engineering - Platform Enablement Texas Instruments France SA, 821 Avenue Jack Kilby, 06270 Villeneuve Loubet. 036 420 040 R.C.S Antibes. Capital de EUR 753.920 -----Original Message----- From: Mark Wielaard [mailto:mjw at redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:26 PM To: Turgis, Frederic Cc: utrace-devel at redhat.com Subject: Re: utrace support on ARM On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 16:26 +0200, Turgis, Frederic wrote: > - http://people.redhat.com/roland/utrace is no longer valid. Where has > it been moved ? http://userweb.kernel.org/~frob/utrace/ > - Mail archive in https://www.redhat.com/archives/utrace-devel/ stops > in December. Did I miss something ? No, that is right. It should now have two new emails in March :) Cheers, Mark From mjw at redhat.com Thu Apr 21 07:15:56 2011 From: mjw at redhat.com (Mark Wielaard) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:15:56 +0200 Subject: utrace support on ARM In-Reply-To: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F146016133A83C@dnce02.ent.ti.com> References: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F1460160F8519F@dnce02.ent.ti.com> <1301412368.24103.46.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F146016133A83C@dnce02.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: <1303370156.11416.34.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> Hi Turgis, On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 10:00 +0200, Turgis, Frederic wrote: > * utrace has not been accepted upstream. Does it mean it may lose > traction ? Is "community" pushing for something else or happy with > what they have ? Parts haven't. utrace builds upon regsets and tracehooks, which are both in the mainline kernel already. But the answer is both. Lots of distros ship kernels with utrace enabled already. But there is also... > * I have also found IBM presentation on utrace-less uprobes. How does it affect utrace ? It doesn't affect it directly. It is just another way to have user space probes working (but without the easy task triggers). So projects that now use a combination of utrace and uprobes will have to adjust a little to work without the easy taks level triggers that utrace brings and use the page level triggers that the new uprobes proposal has. Cheers, Mark From fche at redhat.com Thu Apr 21 17:51:27 2011 From: fche at redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:51:27 -0400 Subject: utrace support on ARM In-Reply-To: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F146016133A83C@dnce02.ent.ti.com> (Frederic Turgis's message of "Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:00:00 +0200") References: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F1460160F8519F@dnce02.ent.ti.com> <1301412368.24103.46.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F146016133A83C@dnce02.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: f-turgis wrote: > [...] > So I am interested in this kind of status: > > * utrace has not been accepted upstream. Does it mean it may lose > traction ? Is "community" pushing for something else or happy with > what they have ? [...] There are many communities. I am not anticipating additional utrace uptake at this time. > * I have also found IBM presentation on utrace-less uprobes. How > does it affect utrace ? It doesn't. As far as systemtap's concerned, if the new uprobes turn out to be versatile enough, we will use them. As far as a systemtap user's concerned, it's all an implementation detail. The scripts should be exactly the same. - FChE From f-turgis at ti.com Thu Apr 21 18:18:20 2011 From: f-turgis at ti.com (Turgis, Frederic) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:18:20 +0200 Subject: utrace support on ARM In-Reply-To: References: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F1460160F8519F@dnce02.ent.ti.com><1301412368.24103.46.camel@springer.wildebeest.org><13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F146016133A83C@dnce02.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F14601613D015A@dnce02.ent.ti.com> Thanks I understand better, I had missed the "Result of Jan 2010 uprobes review and NAK of utrace" from IBM presentation. I generally prefer to have all the features (what utrace provides) but I am still looking for ARM utrace so I have to see uptake of both among ARM users. Hey we almost doubled mailing list archive in not so much time ;-) Regards Fred Frederic Turgis OMAP Platform Business Unit - OMAP System Engineering - Platform Enablement Texas Instruments France SA, 821 Avenue Jack Kilby, 06270 Villeneuve Loubet. 036 420 040 R.C.S Antibes. Capital de EUR 753.920 -----Original Message----- From: Frank Ch. Eigler [mailto:fche at redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 7:51 PM To: Turgis, Frederic Cc: utrace-devel at redhat.com; Mark Wielaard Subject: Re: utrace support on ARM f-turgis wrote: > [...] > So I am interested in this kind of status: > > * utrace has not been accepted upstream. Does it mean it may lose > traction ? Is "community" pushing for something else or happy with > what they have ? [...] There are many communities. I am not anticipating additional utrace uptake at this time. > * I have also found IBM presentation on utrace-less uprobes. How does > it affect utrace ? It doesn't. As far as systemtap's concerned, if the new uprobes turn out to be versatile enough, we will use them. As far as a systemtap user's concerned, it's all an implementation detail. The scripts should be exactly the same. - FChE From roland at hack.frob.com Thu Apr 21 18:14:54 2011 From: roland at hack.frob.com (Roland McGrath) Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:14:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: utrace support on ARM In-Reply-To: Turgis, Frederic's message of Thursday, 21 April 2011 20:18:20 +0200 <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F14601613D015A@dnce02.ent.ti.com> References: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F1460160F8519F@dnce02.ent.ti.com> <1301412368.24103.46.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F146016133A83C@dnce02.ent.ti.com> <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F14601613D015A@dnce02.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: <20110421181454.5FD6F2C13F@topped-with-meat.com> utrace per se has no machine-dependent code. It requires modern support for machine dependencies in generic kernel code, i.e. user_regset and tracehook. The ARM kernel has a tiny subset of those, but not enough to be useful. Long ago I did 98% of the work for implementing user_regset and tracehook support for ARM and posted it, but the ARM kernel maintainers are largely nonresponsive even to working patches. Thanks, Roland From mjw at redhat.com Fri Apr 22 08:17:32 2011 From: mjw at redhat.com (Mark Wielaard) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 04:17:32 -0400 (EDT) Subject: utrace support on ARM In-Reply-To: <20110421181454.5FD6F2C13F@topped-with-meat.com> Message-ID: <1806603978.120284.1303460252752.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> > utrace per se has no machine-dependent code. It requires modern > support for machine dependencies in generic kernel code, > i.e. user_regset and tracehook. The ARM kernel has a tiny > subset of those, but not enough to be useful. > Long ago I did 98% of the work for implementing user_regset > and tracehook support for ARM and posted it This is the patch set Roland refers to if someone wants to help push arm forward: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/24/383 Cheers, Mark From f-turgis at ti.com Fri Apr 22 22:21:42 2011 From: f-turgis at ti.com (Turgis, Frederic) Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 00:21:42 +0200 Subject: utrace support on ARM In-Reply-To: <1806603978.120284.1303460252752.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <20110421181454.5FD6F2C13F@topped-with-meat.com> <1806603978.120284.1303460252752.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F14601613D02F6@dnce02.ent.ti.com> Thanks I will see if I can interest people in TI and Linaro. I will need a good story... ;-) Regards Fred Frederic Turgis OMAP Platform Business Unit - OMAP System Engineering - Platform Enablement Texas Instruments France SA, 821 Avenue Jack Kilby, 06270 Villeneuve Loubet. 036 420 040 R.C.S Antibes. Capital de EUR 753.920 -----Original Message----- From: Mark Wielaard [mailto:mjw at redhat.com] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 10:18 AM To: Roland McGrath Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler; utrace-devel at redhat.com; Turgis, Frederic Subject: Re: utrace support on ARM > utrace per se has no machine-dependent code. It requires modern > support for machine dependencies in generic kernel code, i.e. > user_regset and tracehook. The ARM kernel has a tiny subset of those, > but not enough to be useful. > Long ago I did 98% of the work for implementing user_regset and > tracehook support for ARM and posted it This is the patch set Roland refers to if someone wants to help push arm forward: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/24/383 Cheers, Mark From roland at hack.frob.com Fri Apr 22 23:24:21 2011 From: roland at hack.frob.com (Roland McGrath) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: utrace support on ARM In-Reply-To: Turgis, Frederic's message of Saturday, 23 April 2011 00:21:42 +0200 <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F14601613D02F6@dnce02.ent.ti.com> References: <20110421181454.5FD6F2C13F@topped-with-meat.com> <1806603978.120284.1303460252752.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F14601613D02F6@dnce02.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: <20110422232421.9D0652C13B@topped-with-meat.com> > I will see if I can interest people in TI and Linaro. I will need a good story... ;-) It is kernel port modernization work that nearly every other platform has done by now. From mjw at redhat.com Sat Apr 23 09:12:50 2011 From: mjw at redhat.com (Mark Wielaard) Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 05:12:50 -0400 (EDT) Subject: utrace support on ARM In-Reply-To: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F14601613D02F6@dnce02.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: <2090362284.126617.1303549970204.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> > I will see if I can interest people in TI and Linaro. > I will need a good story... ;-) This describes why you want user_regset: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/616284 This describes why you want tracehooks: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/707950 Both those patch sets have been accepted in mainline and most architectures have implemented the necessary arch specific support already. Read the whole threads for some feedback from other arch maintainers that might be useful when adopting it for ARM too. Cheers, Mark From f-turgis at ti.com Sat Apr 23 10:07:58 2011 From: f-turgis at ti.com (Turgis, Frederic) Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:07:58 +0200 Subject: utrace support on ARM In-Reply-To: <2090362284.126617.1303549970204.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F14601613D02F6@dnce02.ent.ti.com> <2090362284.126617.1303549970204.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <13872098A06B02418CF379A158C0F14601613D0313@dnce02.ent.ti.com> Thanks Roland and Mark. I had found the post on LWN (and a rgrep user_regset in the kernel gives much fun when so many architectures except arm appear). In terms of "good story", I meant to convince company people who already have hard times reaching time to market for their SoC (I guess I am one of these guys ;-) ). For us, acceptable/not too bad (or at least "existing") code may forbid to investigate "better" solution, as we have so many topics in bad shape. And we do not leverage all features. But frankly speaking, I have seen that improving/maturing much in last years. This is for example why I have been able to spend time on systemtap and other tools/methodologies/frameworks. And the optimizations/debug techniques we could propose to dev teams thanks to this have justified afterwards the time spent. So as it makes sense, I will try to revive this topic. Regards fred Frederic Turgis OMAP Platform Business Unit - OMAP System Engineering - Platform Enablement Texas Instruments France SA, 821 Avenue Jack Kilby, 06270 Villeneuve Loubet. 036 420 040 R.C.S Antibes. Capital de EUR 753.920 -----Original Message----- From: Mark Wielaard [mailto:mjw at redhat.com] Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 11:13 AM To: Turgis, Frederic Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler; utrace-devel at redhat.com; Roland McGrath Subject: Re: utrace support on ARM > I will see if I can interest people in TI and Linaro. > I will need a good story... ;-) This describes why you want user_regset: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/616284 This describes why you want tracehooks: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/707950 Both those patch sets have been accepted in mainline and most architectures have implemented the necessary arch specific support already. Read the whole threads for some feedback from other arch maintainers that might be useful when adopting it for ARM too. Cheers, Mark From pradeep.chhetri89 at gmail.com Wed Jun 8 06:05:10 2011 From: pradeep.chhetri89 at gmail.com (Pradeep Chhetri) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:35:10 +0530 Subject: UTRACE PATCHES NEEDED Message-ID: Hello Everyone I am currently working on systemtap trying to extract information from a userspace application which is running somewhere remotely. I am not able to configure my kernel for that. I am able to extract the kernel space data. My machine is having kernel version 2.6.35. I want to know the patches of utrace which are needed for my kernel and the required configuration steps for that. I searched online a lot but didn't get any proper documentation for userspace application monitoring. I would be nice for me if you can provide me the link of the documentation for utrace configuration -- Pradeep Chhetri In the world of Linux, who needs Windows and Gates... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mjw at redhat.com Thu Jun 9 09:37:37 2011 From: mjw at redhat.com (Mark Wielaard) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:37:37 +0200 Subject: UTRACE PATCHES NEEDED In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1307612257.3133.3.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:35 +0530, Pradeep Chhetri wrote: > I am currently working on systemtap trying to extract information from a > userspace application which is running somewhere remotely. I am not able to > configure my kernel for that. You might also want to ask on the systemtap mailinglist. systemtap at sourceware.org > I am able to extract the kernel space data. My > machine is having kernel version 2.6.35. I want to know the patches of > utrace which are needed for my kernel and the required configuration steps > for that. Patch series can be found here: http://userweb.kernel.org/~frob/utrace/ > I searched online a lot but didn't get any proper documentation > for userspace application monitoring. utrace just provides the kernel layer to make userspace monitoring easier. You need tools that take advantage of it, like systemtap, to do the actual observing. > I would be nice for me if you can provide me the link of the documentation > for utrace configuration See also the wiki: http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/utrace Cheers, Mark From renzo at cs.unibo.it Thu Jun 9 16:02:59 2011 From: renzo at cs.unibo.it (Renzo Davoli) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:02:59 +0200 Subject: Call for utrace survival Message-ID: <20110609160258.GF11440@cs.unibo.it> My project kmview is based on utrace. Utrace is a wonderful tool to support partial virtualization, I have found no other tools providing a tracing interface of user processes by kernel modules. -systemtap, dtrace: are mainly for kernel debug -LTTng: creates traces for off-line debugging (ust needs the program to be compiled for tracing, it does not work on existing binaries). utrace can be a fast and smart replacement for the old/slow ptrace. Now the kernel patches are getting obsolete... This is a call for utrace users and developers to see if there are enough (human) resources to continue the project. I am considering to fork the subset of the project needed by kmview, but if there are enough other projects and developers interested to utrace survival we can work together. renzo davoli virtualsquare labs University of Bologna From pradeep.chhetri89 at gmail.com Fri Jun 10 07:58:34 2011 From: pradeep.chhetri89 at gmail.com (Pradeep Chhetri) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:28:34 +0530 Subject: Utrace patch for kernel 2.6.29.6 Message-ID: Hello Everybody Can somebody kindly tell me that whether is there a utrace patch for the linux kernel version 2.6.29.6? If yes, I would be really happy if you can forward me the link of the patch. If no, can somebody kindly refer me some way to do this. Regards -- Pradeep Chhetri In the world of Linux, who needs Windows and Gates... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Alexander.Hoole at ece.uvic.ca Fri Jun 10 15:35:38 2011 From: Alexander.Hoole at ece.uvic.ca (Alexander M. Hoole) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:35:38 -0700 Subject: Utrace patch for kernel 2.6.29.6 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <012901cc2784$0ebc2780$2c347680$@Hoole@ece.uvic.ca> Hello Pradeep, I believe that Mark already answered that question. There is a 2.6.29 patch available: Patch series can be found here: http://userweb.kernel.org/~frob/utrace/ You should ensure that the x.y.z.6 revisions did not change any relevant code or simply build a kernel that has a matching patch set. Regards, Alex From: utrace-devel-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:utrace-devel-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Pradeep Chhetri Sent: June 10, 2011 12:59 AM To: utrace-devel at redhat.com Subject: Utrace patch for kernel 2.6.29.6 Hello Everybody Can somebody kindly tell me that whether is there a utrace patch for the linux kernel version 2.6.29.6? If yes, I would be really happy if you can forward me the link of the patch. If no, can somebody kindly refer me some way to do this. Regards -- Pradeep Chhetri In the world of Linux, who needs Windows and Gates... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From renzo at cs.unibo.it Tue Jun 14 11:11:36 2011 From: renzo at cs.unibo.it (Renzo Davoli) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:11:36 +0200 Subject: Utrace for 2.6.39.1 on View-OS/VirtualSquare In-Reply-To: <20110609160258.GF11440@cs.unibo.it> References: <20110609160258.GF11440@cs.unibo.it> Message-ID: <20110614111136.GI22755@cs.unibo.it> I need utrace for kmview so I have updated the utrace support for 2.6.39.1. The code is here: http://view-os.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/view-os/trunk/utrace/ It seems to work. I have tested kmview on it. renzo From oleg at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 16:07:22 2011 From: oleg at redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:07:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] utrace for 3.0 kernel Message-ID: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> Hello. Utrace patches for 3.0 kernel 0001-ptrace-temporary-revert-the-recent-ptrace-jobctl-re.patch 0002-tracehooks-preparation-for-ptrace-utrace.patch 0003-utrace-core.patch 0004-implement-utrace-ptrace.patch also available in the following git branch git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/oleg/misc.git utrace-3.0 Note: 1/4 is the temporary hack to keep utrace working, we need to completely rework ptrace/utrace interaction. Oleg. From oleg at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 16:07:44 2011 From: oleg at redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:07:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> Temporary revert the following patches to keep utrace/utrace-ptrace working: 40ae717d1e78d982bd469b2013a4cbf4ec1ca434 ptrace: fix signal->wait_chldexit usage in task_clear_group_stop_trapping() 321fb561971ba0f10ce18c0f8a4b9fbfc7cef4b9 ptrace: ptrace_check_attach() should not do s/STOPPED/TRACED/ ee77f075921730b2b465880f9fd4367003bdab39 signal: Turn SIGNAL_STOP_DEQUEUED into GROUP_STOP_DEQUEUED 780006eac2fe7f4d2582da16a096e5a44c4767ff signal: do_signal_stop: Remove the unneeded task_clear_group_stop_pending() 244056f9dbbc6dc4126a301c745fa3dd67d8af3c job control: Don't send duplicate job control stop notification while ptraced ceb6bd67f9b9db765e1c29405f26e8460391badd job control: Notify the real parent of job control events regardless of ptrace 62bcf9d992ecc19ea4f37ff57ee0b3333e3e843e job control: Job control stop notifications should always go to the real parent 75b95953a56969a990e6ce154b260be83818fe71 job control: Add @for_ptrace to do_notify_parent_cldstop() 45cb24a1da53beb70f09efccc0373f6a47a9efe0 job control: Allow access to job control events through ptracees 9b84cca2564b9a5b2d064fb44d2a55a5b44473a0 job control: Fix ptracer wait(2) hang and explain notask_error clearing 408a37de6c95832a4880a88a742f89f0cc554d06 job control: Don't set group_stop exit_code if re-entering job control stop 0e9f0a4abfd80f8adca624538d479d95159b16d8 ptrace: Always put ptracee into appropriate execution state e3bd058f62896ec7a2c605ed62a0a811e9147947 ptrace: Collapse ptrace_untrace() into __ptrace_unlink() d79fdd6d96f46fabb779d86332e3677c6f5c2a4f ptrace: Clean transitions between TASK_STOPPED and TRACED 5224fa3660ad3881d2f2ad726d22614117963f10 ptrace: Make do_signal_stop() use ptrace_stop() if the task is being ptraced 0ae8ce1c8c5b9007ce6bfc83ec2aa0dfce5bbed3 ptrace: Participate in group stop from ptrace_stop() iff the task is trapping for group stop 39efa3ef3a376a4e53de2f82fc91182459d34200 signal: Use GROUP_STOP_PENDING to stop once for a single group stop e5c1902e9260a0075ea52cb5ef627a8d9aaede89 signal: Fix premature completion of group stop when interfered by ptrace fe1bc6a0954611b806f9e158eb0817cf8ba21660 ptrace: Add @why to ptrace_stop() edf2ed153bcae52de70db00a98b0e81a5668e563 ptrace: Kill tracehook_notify_jctl() This obviously reverts some user-visible fixes, but the fixed problems are very old and minor, they were never reported. In the long term we need another solution. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov --- fs/exec.c | 1 - include/linux/sched.h | 17 +-- include/linux/tracehook.h | 27 ++++ kernel/exit.c | 77 ++--------- kernel/ptrace.c | 116 +++++----------- kernel/signal.c | 339 +++++++++------------------------------------ 6 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 429 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index 6075a1e..82b5379 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1769,7 +1769,6 @@ static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start, int exit_code) t = start; do { - task_clear_group_stop_pending(t); if (t != current && t->mm) { sigaddset(&t->pending.signal, SIGKILL); signal_wake_up(t, 1); diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index a837b20..6c42e24 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -663,8 +663,9 @@ struct signal_struct { * Bits in flags field of signal_struct. */ #define SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED 0x00000001 /* job control stop in effect */ -#define SIGNAL_STOP_CONTINUED 0x00000002 /* SIGCONT since WCONTINUED reap */ -#define SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT 0x00000004 /* group exit in progress */ +#define SIGNAL_STOP_DEQUEUED 0x00000002 /* stop signal dequeued */ +#define SIGNAL_STOP_CONTINUED 0x00000004 /* SIGCONT since WCONTINUED reap */ +#define SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT 0x00000008 /* group exit in progress */ /* * Pending notifications to parent. */ @@ -1283,7 +1284,6 @@ struct task_struct { int exit_state; int exit_code, exit_signal; int pdeath_signal; /* The signal sent when the parent dies */ - unsigned int group_stop; /* GROUP_STOP_*, siglock protected */ /* ??? */ unsigned int personality; unsigned did_exec:1; @@ -1803,17 +1803,6 @@ extern void thread_group_times(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut, cputime_t * #define tsk_used_math(p) ((p)->flags & PF_USED_MATH) #define used_math() tsk_used_math(current) -/* - * task->group_stop flags - */ -#define GROUP_STOP_SIGMASK 0xffff /* signr of the last group stop */ -#define GROUP_STOP_PENDING (1 << 16) /* task should stop for group stop */ -#define GROUP_STOP_CONSUME (1 << 17) /* consume group stop count */ -#define GROUP_STOP_TRAPPING (1 << 18) /* switching from STOPPED to TRACED */ -#define GROUP_STOP_DEQUEUED (1 << 19) /* stop signal dequeued */ - -extern void task_clear_group_stop_pending(struct task_struct *task); - #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU #define RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED (1 << 0) /* blocked while in RCU read-side. */ diff --git a/include/linux/tracehook.h b/include/linux/tracehook.h index e95f523..ebcfa4e 100644 --- a/include/linux/tracehook.h +++ b/include/linux/tracehook.h @@ -469,6 +469,33 @@ static inline int tracehook_get_signal(struct task_struct *task, } /** + * tracehook_notify_jctl - report about job control stop/continue + * @notify: zero, %CLD_STOPPED or %CLD_CONTINUED + * @why: %CLD_STOPPED or %CLD_CONTINUED + * + * This is called when we might call do_notify_parent_cldstop(). + * + * @notify is zero if we would not ordinarily send a %SIGCHLD, + * or is the %CLD_STOPPED or %CLD_CONTINUED .si_code for %SIGCHLD. + * + * @why is %CLD_STOPPED when about to stop for job control; + * we are already in %TASK_STOPPED state, about to call schedule(). + * It might also be that we have just exited (check %PF_EXITING), + * but need to report that a group-wide stop is complete. + * + * @why is %CLD_CONTINUED when waking up after job control stop and + * ready to make a delayed @notify report. + * + * Return the %CLD_* value for %SIGCHLD, or zero to generate no signal. + * + * Called with the siglock held. + */ +static inline int tracehook_notify_jctl(int notify, int why) +{ + return notify ?: (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) ? why : 0; +} + +/** * tracehook_finish_jctl - report about return from job control stop * * This is called by do_signal_stop() after wakeup. diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index f2b321b..a86fca4 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -1556,80 +1556,31 @@ static int wait_consider_task(struct wait_opts *wo, int ptrace, if (p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD) return 0; - /* slay zombie? */ - if (p->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE) { + if (likely(!ptrace) && unlikely(task_ptrace(p))) { /* - * A zombie ptracee is only visible to its ptracer. - * Notification and reaping will be cascaded to the real - * parent when the ptracer detaches. - */ - if (likely(!ptrace) && unlikely(task_ptrace(p))) { - /* it will become visible, clear notask_error */ - wo->notask_error = 0; - return 0; - } - - /* we don't reap group leaders with subthreads */ - if (!delay_group_leader(p)) - return wait_task_zombie(wo, p); - - /* - * Allow access to stopped/continued state via zombie by - * falling through. Clearing of notask_error is complex. - * - * When !@ptrace: - * - * If WEXITED is set, notask_error should naturally be - * cleared. If not, subset of WSTOPPED|WCONTINUED is set, - * so, if there are live subthreads, there are events to - * wait for. If all subthreads are dead, it's still safe - * to clear - this function will be called again in finite - * amount time once all the subthreads are released and - * will then return without clearing. - * - * When @ptrace: - * - * Stopped state is per-task and thus can't change once the - * target task dies. Only continued and exited can happen. - * Clear notask_error if WCONTINUED | WEXITED. - */ - if (likely(!ptrace) || (wo->wo_flags & (WCONTINUED | WEXITED))) - wo->notask_error = 0; - } else { - /* - * If @p is ptraced by a task in its real parent's group, - * hide group stop/continued state when looking at @p as - * the real parent; otherwise, a single stop can be - * reported twice as group and ptrace stops. - * - * If a ptracer wants to distinguish the two events for its - * own children, it should create a separate process which - * takes the role of real parent. - */ - if (likely(!ptrace) && task_ptrace(p) && - same_thread_group(p->parent, p->real_parent)) - return 0; - - /* - * @p is alive and it's gonna stop, continue or exit, so - * there always is something to wait for. + * This child is hidden by ptrace. + * We aren't allowed to see it now, but eventually we will. */ wo->notask_error = 0; + return 0; } /* - * Wait for stopped. Depending on @ptrace, different stopped state - * is used and the two don't interact with each other. + * We don't reap group leaders with subthreads. */ + if (p->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE && !delay_group_leader(p)) + return wait_task_zombie(wo, p); + + /* + * It's stopped or running now, so it might + * later continue, exit, or stop again. + */ + wo->notask_error = 0; + ret = wait_task_stopped(wo, ptrace, p); if (ret) return ret; - /* - * Wait for continued. There's only one continued state and the - * ptracer can consume it which can confuse the real parent. Don't - * use WCONTINUED from ptracer. You don't need or want it. - */ return wait_task_continued(wo, p); } diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c index 2df1157..5cb3003 100644 --- a/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -38,33 +38,35 @@ void __ptrace_link(struct task_struct *child, struct task_struct *new_parent) child->parent = new_parent; } -/** - * __ptrace_unlink - unlink ptracee and restore its execution state - * @child: ptracee to be unlinked - * - * Remove @child from the ptrace list, move it back to the original parent, - * and restore the execution state so that it conforms to the group stop - * state. - * - * Unlinking can happen via two paths - explicit PTRACE_DETACH or ptracer - * exiting. For PTRACE_DETACH, unless the ptracee has been killed between - * ptrace_check_attach() and here, it's guaranteed to be in TASK_TRACED. - * If the ptracer is exiting, the ptracee can be in any state. - * - * After detach, the ptracee should be in a state which conforms to the - * group stop. If the group is stopped or in the process of stopping, the - * ptracee should be put into TASK_STOPPED; otherwise, it should be woken - * up from TASK_TRACED. - * - * If the ptracee is in TASK_TRACED and needs to be moved to TASK_STOPPED, - * it goes through TRACED -> RUNNING -> STOPPED transition which is similar - * to but in the opposite direction of what happens while attaching to a - * stopped task. However, in this direction, the intermediate RUNNING - * state is not hidden even from the current ptracer and if it immediately - * re-attaches and performs a WNOHANG wait(2), it may fail. +/* + * Turn a tracing stop into a normal stop now, since with no tracer there + * would be no way to wake it up with SIGCONT or SIGKILL. If there was a + * signal sent that would resume the child, but didn't because it was in + * TASK_TRACED, resume it now. + * Requires that irqs be disabled. + */ +static void ptrace_untrace(struct task_struct *child) +{ + spin_lock(&child->sighand->siglock); + if (task_is_traced(child)) { + /* + * If the group stop is completed or in progress, + * this thread was already counted as stopped. + */ + if (child->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED || + child->signal->group_stop_count) + __set_task_state(child, TASK_STOPPED); + else + signal_wake_up(child, 1); + } + spin_unlock(&child->sighand->siglock); +} + +/* + * unptrace a task: move it back to its original parent and + * remove it from the ptrace list. * - * CONTEXT: - * write_lock_irq(tasklist_lock) + * Must be called with the tasklist lock write-held. */ void __ptrace_unlink(struct task_struct *child) { @@ -74,27 +76,8 @@ void __ptrace_unlink(struct task_struct *child) child->parent = child->real_parent; list_del_init(&child->ptrace_entry); - spin_lock(&child->sighand->siglock); - - /* - * Reinstate GROUP_STOP_PENDING if group stop is in effect and - * @child isn't dead. - */ - if (!(child->flags & PF_EXITING) && - (child->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED || - child->signal->group_stop_count)) - child->group_stop |= GROUP_STOP_PENDING; - - /* - * If transition to TASK_STOPPED is pending or in TASK_TRACED, kick - * @child in the butt. Note that @resume should be used iff @child - * is in TASK_TRACED; otherwise, we might unduly disrupt - * TASK_KILLABLE sleeps. - */ - if (child->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_PENDING || task_is_traced(child)) - signal_wake_up(child, task_is_traced(child)); - - spin_unlock(&child->sighand->siglock); + if (task_is_traced(child)) + ptrace_untrace(child); } /* @@ -113,14 +96,16 @@ int ptrace_check_attach(struct task_struct *child, int kill) */ read_lock(&tasklist_lock); if ((child->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) && child->parent == current) { + ret = 0; /* * child->sighand can't be NULL, release_task() * does ptrace_unlink() before __exit_signal(). */ spin_lock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock); - WARN_ON_ONCE(task_is_stopped(child)); - if (task_is_traced(child) || kill) - ret = 0; + if (task_is_stopped(child)) + child->state = TASK_TRACED; + else if (!task_is_traced(child) && !kill) + ret = -ESRCH; spin_unlock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock); } read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); @@ -184,7 +169,6 @@ bool ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode) static int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task) { - bool wait_trap = false; int retval; audit_ptrace(task); @@ -224,42 +208,12 @@ static int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task) __ptrace_link(task, current); send_sig_info(SIGSTOP, SEND_SIG_FORCED, task); - spin_lock(&task->sighand->siglock); - - /* - * If the task is already STOPPED, set GROUP_STOP_PENDING and - * TRAPPING, and kick it so that it transits to TRACED. TRAPPING - * will be cleared if the child completes the transition or any - * event which clears the group stop states happens. We'll wait - * for the transition to complete before returning from this - * function. - * - * This hides STOPPED -> RUNNING -> TRACED transition from the - * attaching thread but a different thread in the same group can - * still observe the transient RUNNING state. IOW, if another - * thread's WNOHANG wait(2) on the stopped tracee races against - * ATTACH, the wait(2) may fail due to the transient RUNNING. - * - * The following task_is_stopped() test is safe as both transitions - * in and out of STOPPED are protected by siglock. - */ - if (task_is_stopped(task)) { - task->group_stop |= GROUP_STOP_PENDING | GROUP_STOP_TRAPPING; - signal_wake_up(task, 1); - wait_trap = true; - } - - spin_unlock(&task->sighand->siglock); - retval = 0; unlock_tasklist: write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); unlock_creds: mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex); out: - if (wait_trap) - wait_event(current->signal->wait_chldexit, - !(task->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_TRAPPING)); return retval; } diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index ff76786..23a31b6 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static inline int has_pending_signals(sigset_t *signal, sigset_t *blocked) static int recalc_sigpending_tsk(struct task_struct *t) { - if ((t->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_PENDING) || + if (t->signal->group_stop_count > 0 || PENDING(&t->pending, &t->blocked) || PENDING(&t->signal->shared_pending, &t->blocked)) { set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_SIGPENDING); @@ -223,83 +223,6 @@ static inline void print_dropped_signal(int sig) current->comm, current->pid, sig); } -/** - * task_clear_group_stop_trapping - clear group stop trapping bit - * @task: target task - * - * If GROUP_STOP_TRAPPING is set, a ptracer is waiting for us. Clear it - * and wake up the ptracer. Note that we don't need any further locking. - * @task->siglock guarantees that @task->parent points to the ptracer. - * - * CONTEXT: - * Must be called with @task->sighand->siglock held. - */ -static void task_clear_group_stop_trapping(struct task_struct *task) -{ - if (unlikely(task->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_TRAPPING)) { - task->group_stop &= ~GROUP_STOP_TRAPPING; - __wake_up_sync_key(&task->parent->signal->wait_chldexit, - TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 1, task); - } -} - -/** - * task_clear_group_stop_pending - clear pending group stop - * @task: target task - * - * Clear group stop states for @task. - * - * CONTEXT: - * Must be called with @task->sighand->siglock held. - */ -void task_clear_group_stop_pending(struct task_struct *task) -{ - task->group_stop &= ~(GROUP_STOP_PENDING | GROUP_STOP_CONSUME | - GROUP_STOP_DEQUEUED); -} - -/** - * task_participate_group_stop - participate in a group stop - * @task: task participating in a group stop - * - * @task has GROUP_STOP_PENDING set and is participating in a group stop. - * Group stop states are cleared and the group stop count is consumed if - * %GROUP_STOP_CONSUME was set. If the consumption completes the group - * stop, the appropriate %SIGNAL_* flags are set. - * - * CONTEXT: - * Must be called with @task->sighand->siglock held. - * - * RETURNS: - * %true if group stop completion should be notified to the parent, %false - * otherwise. - */ -static bool task_participate_group_stop(struct task_struct *task) -{ - struct signal_struct *sig = task->signal; - bool consume = task->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_CONSUME; - - WARN_ON_ONCE(!(task->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_PENDING)); - - task_clear_group_stop_pending(task); - - if (!consume) - return false; - - if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(sig->group_stop_count == 0)) - sig->group_stop_count--; - - /* - * Tell the caller to notify completion iff we are entering into a - * fresh group stop. Read comment in do_signal_stop() for details. - */ - if (!sig->group_stop_count && !(sig->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED)) { - sig->flags = SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED; - return true; - } - return false; -} - /* * allocate a new signal queue record * - this may be called without locks if and only if t == current, otherwise an @@ -604,7 +527,7 @@ int dequeue_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, sigset_t *mask, siginfo_t *info) * is to alert stop-signal processing code when another * processor has come along and cleared the flag. */ - current->group_stop |= GROUP_STOP_DEQUEUED; + tsk->signal->flags |= SIGNAL_STOP_DEQUEUED; } if ((info->si_code & __SI_MASK) == __SI_TIMER && info->si_sys_private) { /* @@ -809,7 +732,6 @@ static int prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, int from_ancestor_ns) rm_from_queue(SIG_KERNEL_STOP_MASK, &signal->shared_pending); t = p; do { - task_clear_group_stop_pending(t); rm_from_queue(SIG_KERNEL_STOP_MASK, &t->pending); wake_up_state(t, __TASK_STOPPED); } while_each_thread(p, t); @@ -837,6 +759,13 @@ static int prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, int from_ancestor_ns) signal->flags = why | SIGNAL_STOP_CONTINUED; signal->group_stop_count = 0; signal->group_exit_code = 0; + } else { + /* + * We are not stopped, but there could be a stop + * signal in the middle of being processed after + * being removed from the queue. Clear that too. + */ + signal->flags &= ~SIGNAL_STOP_DEQUEUED; } } @@ -925,7 +854,6 @@ static void complete_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, int group) signal->group_stop_count = 0; t = p; do { - task_clear_group_stop_pending(t); sigaddset(&t->pending.signal, SIGKILL); signal_wake_up(t, 1); } while_each_thread(p, t); @@ -1160,7 +1088,6 @@ int zap_other_threads(struct task_struct *p) p->signal->group_stop_count = 0; while_each_thread(p, t) { - task_clear_group_stop_pending(t); count++; /* Don't bother with already dead threads */ @@ -1588,30 +1515,16 @@ int do_notify_parent(struct task_struct *tsk, int sig) return ret; } -/** - * do_notify_parent_cldstop - notify parent of stopped/continued state change - * @tsk: task reporting the state change - * @for_ptracer: the notification is for ptracer - * @why: CLD_{CONTINUED|STOPPED|TRAPPED} to report - * - * Notify @tsk's parent that the stopped/continued state has changed. If - * @for_ptracer is %false, @tsk's group leader notifies to its real parent. - * If %true, @tsk reports to @tsk->parent which should be the ptracer. - * - * CONTEXT: - * Must be called with tasklist_lock at least read locked. - */ -static void do_notify_parent_cldstop(struct task_struct *tsk, - bool for_ptracer, int why) +static void do_notify_parent_cldstop(struct task_struct *tsk, int why) { struct siginfo info; unsigned long flags; struct task_struct *parent; struct sighand_struct *sighand; - if (for_ptracer) { + if (task_ptrace(tsk)) parent = tsk->parent; - } else { + else { tsk = tsk->group_leader; parent = tsk->real_parent; } @@ -1687,15 +1600,6 @@ static int sigkill_pending(struct task_struct *tsk) } /* - * Test whether the target task of the usual cldstop notification - the - * real_parent of @child - is in the same group as the ptracer. - */ -static bool real_parent_is_ptracer(struct task_struct *child) -{ - return same_thread_group(child->parent, child->real_parent); -} - -/* * This must be called with current->sighand->siglock held. * * This should be the path for all ptrace stops. @@ -1706,12 +1610,10 @@ static bool real_parent_is_ptracer(struct task_struct *child) * If we actually decide not to stop at all because the tracer * is gone, we keep current->exit_code unless clear_code. */ -static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, int clear_code, siginfo_t *info) +static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int clear_code, siginfo_t *info) __releases(¤t->sighand->siglock) __acquires(¤t->sighand->siglock) { - bool gstop_done = false; - if (arch_ptrace_stop_needed(exit_code, info)) { /* * The arch code has something special to do before a @@ -1732,49 +1634,21 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, int clear_code, siginfo_t *info) } /* - * If @why is CLD_STOPPED, we're trapping to participate in a group - * stop. Do the bookkeeping. Note that if SIGCONT was delievered - * while siglock was released for the arch hook, PENDING could be - * clear now. We act as if SIGCONT is received after TASK_TRACED - * is entered - ignore it. + * If there is a group stop in progress, + * we must participate in the bookkeeping. */ - if (why == CLD_STOPPED && (current->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_PENDING)) - gstop_done = task_participate_group_stop(current); + if (current->signal->group_stop_count > 0) + --current->signal->group_stop_count; current->last_siginfo = info; current->exit_code = exit_code; - /* - * TRACED should be visible before TRAPPING is cleared; otherwise, - * the tracer might fail do_wait(). - */ - set_current_state(TASK_TRACED); - - /* - * We're committing to trapping. Clearing GROUP_STOP_TRAPPING and - * transition to TASK_TRACED should be atomic with respect to - * siglock. This hsould be done after the arch hook as siglock is - * released and regrabbed across it. - */ - task_clear_group_stop_trapping(current); - + /* Let the debugger run. */ + __set_current_state(TASK_TRACED); spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); read_lock(&tasklist_lock); if (may_ptrace_stop()) { - /* - * Notify parents of the stop. - * - * While ptraced, there are two parents - the ptracer and - * the real_parent of the group_leader. The ptracer should - * know about every stop while the real parent is only - * interested in the completion of group stop. The states - * for the two don't interact with each other. Notify - * separately unless they're gonna be duplicates. - */ - do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, true, why); - if (gstop_done && !real_parent_is_ptracer(current)) - do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, false, why); - + do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, CLD_TRAPPED); /* * Don't want to allow preemption here, because * sys_ptrace() needs this task to be inactive. @@ -1789,16 +1663,7 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, int clear_code, siginfo_t *info) /* * By the time we got the lock, our tracer went away. * Don't drop the lock yet, another tracer may come. - * - * If @gstop_done, the ptracer went away between group stop - * completion and here. During detach, it would have set - * GROUP_STOP_PENDING on us and we'll re-enter TASK_STOPPED - * in do_signal_stop() on return, so notifying the real - * parent of the group stop completion is enough. */ - if (gstop_done) - do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, false, why); - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); if (clear_code) current->exit_code = 0; @@ -1842,7 +1707,7 @@ void ptrace_notify(int exit_code) /* Let the debugger run. */ spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - ptrace_stop(exit_code, CLD_TRAPPED, 1, &info); + ptrace_stop(exit_code, 1, &info); spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); } @@ -1855,115 +1720,64 @@ void ptrace_notify(int exit_code) static int do_signal_stop(int signr) { struct signal_struct *sig = current->signal; + int notify; - if (!(current->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_PENDING)) { - unsigned int gstop = GROUP_STOP_PENDING | GROUP_STOP_CONSUME; + if (!sig->group_stop_count) { struct task_struct *t; - /* signr will be recorded in task->group_stop for retries */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(signr & ~GROUP_STOP_SIGMASK); - - if (!likely(current->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_DEQUEUED) || + if (!likely(sig->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_DEQUEUED) || unlikely(signal_group_exit(sig))) return 0; /* - * There is no group stop already in progress. We must - * initiate one now. - * - * While ptraced, a task may be resumed while group stop is - * still in effect and then receive a stop signal and - * initiate another group stop. This deviates from the - * usual behavior as two consecutive stop signals can't - * cause two group stops when !ptraced. That is why we - * also check !task_is_stopped(t) below. - * - * The condition can be distinguished by testing whether - * SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED is already set. Don't generate - * group_exit_code in such case. - * - * This is not necessary for SIGNAL_STOP_CONTINUED because - * an intervening stop signal is required to cause two - * continued events regardless of ptrace. + * There is no group stop already in progress. + * We must initiate one now. */ - if (!(sig->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED)) - sig->group_exit_code = signr; - else - WARN_ON_ONCE(!task_ptrace(current)); + sig->group_exit_code = signr; - current->group_stop &= ~GROUP_STOP_SIGMASK; - current->group_stop |= signr | gstop; sig->group_stop_count = 1; - for (t = next_thread(current); t != current; - t = next_thread(t)) { - t->group_stop &= ~GROUP_STOP_SIGMASK; + for (t = next_thread(current); t != current; t = next_thread(t)) /* * Setting state to TASK_STOPPED for a group * stop is always done with the siglock held, * so this check has no races. */ - if (!(t->flags & PF_EXITING) && !task_is_stopped(t)) { - t->group_stop |= signr | gstop; + if (!(t->flags & PF_EXITING) && + !task_is_stopped_or_traced(t)) { sig->group_stop_count++; signal_wake_up(t, 0); } - } } -retry: - if (likely(!task_ptrace(current))) { - int notify = 0; - - /* - * If there are no other threads in the group, or if there - * is a group stop in progress and we are the last to stop, - * report to the parent. - */ - if (task_participate_group_stop(current)) - notify = CLD_STOPPED; - - __set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED); - spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - - /* - * Notify the parent of the group stop completion. Because - * we're not holding either the siglock or tasklist_lock - * here, ptracer may attach inbetween; however, this is for - * group stop and should always be delivered to the real - * parent of the group leader. The new ptracer will get - * its notification when this task transitions into - * TASK_TRACED. - */ - if (notify) { - read_lock(&tasklist_lock); - do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, false, notify); - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); - } - - /* Now we don't run again until woken by SIGCONT or SIGKILL */ - schedule(); - - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - } else { - ptrace_stop(current->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_SIGMASK, - CLD_STOPPED, 0, NULL); - current->exit_code = 0; - } - /* - * GROUP_STOP_PENDING could be set if another group stop has - * started since being woken up or ptrace wants us to transit - * between TASK_STOPPED and TRACED. Retry group stop. + * If there are no other threads in the group, or if there is + * a group stop in progress and we are the last to stop, report + * to the parent. When ptraced, every thread reports itself. + */ + notify = sig->group_stop_count == 1 ? CLD_STOPPED : 0; + notify = tracehook_notify_jctl(notify, CLD_STOPPED); + /* + * tracehook_notify_jctl() can drop and reacquire siglock, so + * we keep ->group_stop_count != 0 before the call. If SIGCONT + * or SIGKILL comes in between ->group_stop_count == 0. */ - if (current->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_PENDING) { - WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_SIGMASK)); - goto retry; + if (sig->group_stop_count) { + if (!--sig->group_stop_count) + sig->flags = SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED; + current->exit_code = sig->group_exit_code; + __set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED); } + spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - /* PTRACE_ATTACH might have raced with task killing, clear trapping */ - task_clear_group_stop_trapping(current); + if (notify) { + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); + do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, notify); + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + } - spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); + /* Now we don't run again until woken by SIGCONT or SIGKILL */ + schedule(); tracehook_finish_jctl(); + current->exit_code = 0; return 1; } @@ -1977,7 +1791,7 @@ static int ptrace_signal(int signr, siginfo_t *info, ptrace_signal_deliver(regs, cookie); /* Let the debugger run. */ - ptrace_stop(signr, CLD_TRAPPED, 0, info); + ptrace_stop(signr, 0, info); /* We're back. Did the debugger cancel the sig? */ signr = current->exit_code; @@ -2032,7 +1846,6 @@ relock: * the CLD_ si_code into SIGNAL_CLD_MASK bits. */ if (unlikely(signal->flags & SIGNAL_CLD_MASK)) { - struct task_struct *leader; int why; if (signal->flags & SIGNAL_CLD_CONTINUED) @@ -2042,26 +1855,14 @@ relock: signal->flags &= ~SIGNAL_CLD_MASK; + why = tracehook_notify_jctl(why, CLD_CONTINUED); spin_unlock_irq(&sighand->siglock); - /* - * Notify the parent that we're continuing. This event is - * always per-process and doesn't make whole lot of sense - * for ptracers, who shouldn't consume the state via - * wait(2) either, but, for backward compatibility, notify - * the ptracer of the group leader too unless it's gonna be - * a duplicate. - */ - read_lock(&tasklist_lock); - - do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, false, why); - - leader = current->group_leader; - if (task_ptrace(leader) && !real_parent_is_ptracer(leader)) - do_notify_parent_cldstop(leader, true, why); - - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); - + if (why) { + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); + do_notify_parent_cldstop(current->group_leader, why); + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + } goto relock; } @@ -2078,8 +1879,8 @@ relock: if (unlikely(signr != 0)) ka = return_ka; else { - if (unlikely(current->group_stop & - GROUP_STOP_PENDING) && do_signal_stop(0)) + if (unlikely(signal->group_stop_count > 0) && + do_signal_stop(0)) goto relock; signr = dequeue_signal(current, ¤t->blocked, @@ -2253,19 +2054,17 @@ void exit_signals(struct task_struct *tsk) signotset(&unblocked); retarget_shared_pending(tsk, &unblocked); - if (unlikely(tsk->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_PENDING) && - task_participate_group_stop(tsk)) - group_stop = CLD_STOPPED; + if (unlikely(tsk->signal->group_stop_count) && + !--tsk->signal->group_stop_count) { + tsk->signal->flags = SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED; + group_stop = tracehook_notify_jctl(CLD_STOPPED, CLD_STOPPED); + } out: spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock); - /* - * If group stop has completed, deliver the notification. This - * should always go to the real parent of the group leader. - */ if (unlikely(group_stop)) { read_lock(&tasklist_lock); - do_notify_parent_cldstop(tsk, false, group_stop); + do_notify_parent_cldstop(tsk, group_stop); read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); } } -- 1.5.5.1 From oleg at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 16:08:03 2011 From: oleg at redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:08:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] tracehooks: preparation for ptrace-utrace In-Reply-To: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110620160803.GC5994@redhat.com> - export __ptrace_detach() and do_notify_parent_cldstop() - change some "if (ptrace)" checks to ensure the old ptrace code is not called when the tracee is PT_UTRACED Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov --- include/linux/ptrace.h | 2 ++ include/linux/sched.h | 1 + include/linux/tracehook.h | 10 +++++----- kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +- kernel/signal.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/ptrace.h b/include/linux/ptrace.h index 9178d5c..446ed8f 100644 --- a/include/linux/ptrace.h +++ b/include/linux/ptrace.h @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ #include /* For unlikely. */ #include /* For struct task_struct. */ +extern bool __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *tracer, + struct task_struct *tracee); extern long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, unsigned long addr, unsigned long data); diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index 6c42e24..ea15b36 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -2132,6 +2132,7 @@ extern int kill_pgrp(struct pid *pid, int sig, int priv); extern int kill_pid(struct pid *pid, int sig, int priv); extern int kill_proc_info(int, struct siginfo *, pid_t); extern int do_notify_parent(struct task_struct *, int); +extern void do_notify_parent_cldstop(struct task_struct *, int); extern void __wake_up_parent(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct *parent); extern void force_sig(int, struct task_struct *); extern int send_sig(int, struct task_struct *, int); diff --git a/include/linux/tracehook.h b/include/linux/tracehook.h index ebcfa4e..c57a138 100644 --- a/include/linux/tracehook.h +++ b/include/linux/tracehook.h @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static inline __must_check int tracehook_report_syscall_entry( */ static inline void tracehook_report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, int step) { - if (step) { + if (step && (task_ptrace(current) & PT_PTRACED)) { siginfo_t info; user_single_step_siginfo(current, regs, &info); force_sig_info(SIGTRAP, &info, current); @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static inline int tracehook_unsafe_exec(struct task_struct *task) { int unsafe = 0; int ptrace = task_ptrace(task); - if (ptrace & PT_PTRACED) { + if (ptrace) { if (ptrace & PT_PTRACE_CAP) unsafe |= LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE_CAP; else @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static inline int tracehook_unsafe_exec(struct task_struct *task) */ static inline struct task_struct *tracehook_tracer_task(struct task_struct *tsk) { - if (task_ptrace(tsk) & PT_PTRACED) + if (task_ptrace(tsk)) return rcu_dereference(tsk->parent); return NULL; } @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static inline void tracehook_signal_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, const struct k_sigaction *ka, struct pt_regs *regs, int stepping) { - if (stepping) + if (stepping && (task_ptrace(current) & PT_PTRACED)) ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP); } @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static inline int tracehook_get_signal(struct task_struct *task, */ static inline int tracehook_notify_jctl(int notify, int why) { - return notify ?: (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) ? why : 0; + return notify ?: task_ptrace(current) ? why : 0; } /** diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c index 5cb3003..72e7ad4 100644 --- a/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int ignoring_children(struct sighand_struct *sigh) * reap it now, in that case we must also wake up sub-threads sleeping in * do_wait(). */ -static bool __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *tracer, struct task_struct *p) +bool __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *tracer, struct task_struct *p) { __ptrace_unlink(p); diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 23a31b6..255a793 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@ int do_notify_parent(struct task_struct *tsk, int sig) return ret; } -static void do_notify_parent_cldstop(struct task_struct *tsk, int why) +void do_notify_parent_cldstop(struct task_struct *tsk, int why) { struct siginfo info; unsigned long flags; @@ -1785,7 +1785,7 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr) static int ptrace_signal(int signr, siginfo_t *info, struct pt_regs *regs, void *cookie) { - if (!task_ptrace(current)) + if (!(task_ptrace(current) & PT_PTRACED)) return signr; ptrace_signal_deliver(regs, cookie); -- 1.5.5.1 From oleg at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 16:08:20 2011 From: oleg at redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:08:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] utrace core In-Reply-To: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110620160820.GD5994@redhat.com> This adds the utrace facility, a new modular interface in the kernel for implementing user thread tracing and debugging. This fits on top of the tracehook_* layer, so the new code is well-isolated. The new interface is in and the DocBook utrace book describes it. It allows for multiple separate tracing engines to work in parallel without interfering with each other. Higher-level tracing facilities can be implemented as loadable kernel modules using this layer. The new facility is made optional under CONFIG_UTRACE. When this is not enabled, no new code is added. It can only be enabled on machines that have all the prerequisites and select CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK. In this initial version, utrace and ptrace do not play together at all. The next patch reworks ptrace to use the utrace API. Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov --- Documentation/DocBook/Makefile | 2 +- Documentation/DocBook/utrace.tmpl | 589 +++++++++ fs/proc/array.c | 3 + include/linux/sched.h | 5 + include/linux/tracehook.h | 87 ++- include/linux/utrace.h | 692 +++++++++++ init/Kconfig | 9 + kernel/Makefile | 1 + kernel/fork.c | 3 + kernel/utrace.c | 2440 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 10 files changed, 3829 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/DocBook/utrace.tmpl create mode 100644 include/linux/utrace.h create mode 100644 kernel/utrace.c diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/Makefile b/Documentation/DocBook/Makefile index 3cebfa0..86c288b 100644 --- a/Documentation/DocBook/Makefile +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/Makefile @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ DOCBOOKS := z8530book.xml mcabook.xml device-drivers.xml \ genericirq.xml s390-drivers.xml uio-howto.xml scsi.xml \ 80211.xml debugobjects.xml sh.xml regulator.xml \ alsa-driver-api.xml writing-an-alsa-driver.xml \ - tracepoint.xml media.xml drm.xml + tracepoint.xml utrace.xml media.xml drm.xml ### # The build process is as follows (targets): diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/utrace.tmpl b/Documentation/DocBook/utrace.tmpl new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0c40add --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/utrace.tmpl @@ -0,0 +1,589 @@ + + + + + + The utrace User Debugging Infrastructure + + + + + utrace concepts + + Introduction + + + utrace is infrastructure code for tracing + and controlling user threads. This is the foundation for writing + tracing engines, which can be loadable kernel modules. + + + + The basic actors in utrace are the thread + and the tracing engine. A tracing engine is some body of code that + calls into the <linux/utrace.h> + interfaces, represented by a struct + utrace_engine_ops. (Usually it's a kernel module, + though the legacy ptrace support is a tracing + engine that is not in a kernel module.) The interface operates on + individual threads (struct task_struct). + If an engine wants to treat several threads as a group, that is up + to its higher-level code. + + + + Tracing begins by attaching an engine to a thread, using + utrace_attach_task or + utrace_attach_pid. If successful, it returns a + pointer that is the handle used in all other calls. + + + + + Events and Callbacks + + + An attached engine does nothing by default. An engine makes something + happen by requesting callbacks via utrace_set_events + and poking the thread with utrace_control. + The synchronization issues related to these two calls + are discussed further below in . + + + + Events are specified using the macro + UTRACE_EVENT(type). + Each event type is associated with a callback in struct + utrace_engine_ops. A tracing engine can leave unused + callbacks NULL. The only callbacks required + are those used by the event flags it sets. + + + + Many engines can be attached to each thread. When a thread has an + event, each engine gets a callback if it has set the event flag for + that event type. For most events, engines are called in the order they + attached. Engines that attach after the event has occurred do not get + callbacks for that event. This includes any new engines just attached + by an existing engine's callback function. Once the sequence of + callbacks for that one event has completed, such new engines are then + eligible in the next sequence that starts when there is another event. + + + + Event reporting callbacks have details particular to the event type, + but are all called in similar environments and have the same + constraints. Callbacks are made from safe points, where no locks + are held, no special resources are pinned (usually), and the + user-mode state of the thread is accessible. So, callback code has + a pretty free hand. But to be a good citizen, callback code should + never block for long periods. It is fine to block in + kmalloc and the like, but never wait for i/o or + for user mode to do something. If you need the thread to wait, use + UTRACE_STOP and return from the callback + quickly. When your i/o finishes or whatever, you can use + utrace_control to resume the thread. + + + + The UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_ENTRY) event is a special + case. While other events happen in the kernel when it will return to + user mode soon, this event happens when entering the kernel before it + will proceed with the work requested from user mode. Because of this + difference, the report_syscall_entry callback is + special in two ways. For this event, engines are called in reverse of + the normal order (this includes the report_quiesce + call that precedes a report_syscall_entry call). + This preserves the semantics that the last engine to attach is called + "closest to user mode"--the engine that is first to see a thread's user + state when it enters the kernel is also the last to see that state when + the thread returns to user mode. For the same reason, if these + callbacks use UTRACE_STOP (see the next section), + the thread stops immediately after callbacks rather than only when it's + ready to return to user mode; when allowed to resume, it will actually + attempt the system call indicated by the register values at that time. + + + + + Stopping Safely + + Writing well-behaved callbacks + + + Well-behaved callbacks are important to maintain two essential + properties of the interface. The first of these is that unrelated + tracing engines should not interfere with each other. If your engine's + event callback does not return quickly, then another engine won't get + the event notification in a timely manner. The second important + property is that tracing should be as noninvasive as possible to the + normal operation of the system overall and of the traced thread in + particular. That is, attached tracing engines should not perturb a + thread's behavior, except to the extent that changing its user-visible + state is explicitly what you want to do. (Obviously some perturbation + is unavoidable, primarily timing changes, ranging from small delays due + to the overhead of tracing, to arbitrary pauses in user code execution + when a user stops a thread with a debugger for examination.) Even when + you explicitly want the perturbation of making the traced thread block, + just blocking directly in your callback has more unwanted effects. For + example, the CLONE event callbacks are called when + the new child thread has been created but not yet started running; the + child can never be scheduled until the CLONE + tracing callbacks return. (This allows engines tracing the parent to + attach to the child.) If a CLONE event callback + blocks the parent thread, it also prevents the child thread from + running (even to process a SIGKILL). If what you + want is to make both the parent and child block, then use + utrace_attach_task on the child and then use + UTRACE_STOP on both threads. A more crucial + problem with blocking in callbacks is that it can prevent + SIGKILL from working. A thread that is blocking + due to UTRACE_STOP will still wake up and die + immediately when sent a SIGKILL, as all threads + should. Relying on the utrace + infrastructure rather than on private synchronization calls in event + callbacks is an important way to help keep tracing robustly + noninvasive. + + + + + Using <constant>UTRACE_STOP</constant> + + + To control another thread and access its state, it must be stopped + with UTRACE_STOP. This means that it is + stopped and won't start running again while we access it. When a + thread is not already stopped, utrace_control + returns -EINPROGRESS and an engine must wait + for an event callback when the thread is ready to stop. The thread + may be running on another CPU or may be blocked. When it is ready + to be examined, it will make callbacks to engines that set the + UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE) event bit. To wake up an + interruptible wait, use UTRACE_INTERRUPT. + + + + As long as some engine has used UTRACE_STOP and + not called utrace_control to resume the thread, + then the thread will remain stopped. SIGKILL + will wake it up, but it will not run user code. When the stop is + cleared with utrace_control or a callback + return value, the thread starts running again. + (See also .) + + + + + + + Tear-down Races + + Primacy of <constant>SIGKILL</constant> + + Ordinarily synchronization issues for tracing engines are kept fairly + straightforward by using UTRACE_STOP. You ask a + thread to stop, and then once it makes the + report_quiesce callback it cannot do anything else + that would result in another callback, until you let it with a + utrace_control call. This simple arrangement + avoids complex and error-prone code in each one of a tracing engine's + event callbacks to keep them serialized with the engine's other + operations done on that thread from another thread of control. + However, giving tracing engines complete power to keep a traced thread + stuck in place runs afoul of a more important kind of simplicity that + the kernel overall guarantees: nothing can prevent or delay + SIGKILL from making a thread die and release its + resources. To preserve this important property of + SIGKILL, it as a special case can break + UTRACE_STOP like nothing else normally can. This + includes both explicit SIGKILL signals and the + implicit SIGKILL sent to each other thread in the + same thread group by a thread doing an exec, or processing a fatal + signal, or making an exit_group system call. A + tracing engine can prevent a thread from beginning the exit or exec or + dying by signal (other than SIGKILL) if it is + attached to that thread, but once the operation begins, no tracing + engine can prevent or delay all other threads in the same thread group + dying. + + + + Final callbacks + + The report_reap callback is always the final event + in the life cycle of a traced thread. Tracing engines can use this as + the trigger to clean up their own data structures. The + report_death callback is always the penultimate + event a tracing engine might see; it's seen unless the thread was + already in the midst of dying when the engine attached. Many tracing + engines will have no interest in when a parent reaps a dead process, + and nothing they want to do with a zombie thread once it dies; for + them, the report_death callback is the natural + place to clean up data structures and detach. To facilitate writing + such engines robustly, given the asynchrony of + SIGKILL, and without error-prone manual + implementation of synchronization schemes, the + utrace infrastructure provides some special + guarantees about the report_death and + report_reap callbacks. It still takes some care + to be sure your tracing engine is robust to tear-down races, but these + rules make it reasonably straightforward and concise to handle a lot of + corner cases correctly. + + + + Engine and task pointers + + The first sort of guarantee concerns the core data structures + themselves. struct utrace_engine is + a reference-counted data structure. While you hold a reference, an + engine pointer will always stay valid so that you can safely pass it to + any utrace call. Each call to + utrace_attach_task or + utrace_attach_pid returns an engine pointer with a + reference belonging to the caller. You own that reference until you + drop it using utrace_engine_put. There is an + implicit reference on the engine while it is attached. So if you drop + your only reference, and then use + utrace_attach_task without + UTRACE_ATTACH_CREATE to look up that same engine, + you will get the same pointer with a new reference to replace the one + you dropped, just like calling utrace_engine_get. + When an engine has been detached, either explicitly with + UTRACE_DETACH or implicitly after + report_reap, then any references you hold are all + that keep the old engine pointer alive. + + + + There is nothing a kernel module can do to keep a struct + task_struct alive outside of + rcu_read_lock. When the task dies and is reaped + by its parent (or itself), that structure can be freed so that any + dangling pointers you have stored become invalid. + utrace will not prevent this, but it can + help you detect it safely. By definition, a task that has been reaped + has had all its engines detached. All + utrace calls can be safely called on a + detached engine if the caller holds a reference on that engine pointer, + even if the task pointer passed in the call is invalid. All calls + return -ESRCH for a detached engine, which tells + you that the task pointer you passed could be invalid now. Since + utrace_control and + utrace_set_events do not block, you can call those + inside a rcu_read_lock section and be sure after + they don't return -ESRCH that the task pointer is + still valid until rcu_read_unlock. The + infrastructure never holds task references of its own. Though neither + rcu_read_lock nor any other lock is held while + making a callback, it's always guaranteed that the struct + task_struct and the struct + utrace_engine passed as arguments remain valid + until the callback function returns. + + + + The common means for safely holding task pointers that is available to + kernel modules is to use struct pid, which + permits put_pid from kernel modules. When using + that, the calls utrace_attach_pid, + utrace_control_pid, + utrace_set_events_pid, and + utrace_barrier_pid are available. + + + + + + Serialization of <constant>DEATH</constant> and <constant>REAP</constant> + + + The second guarantee is the serialization of + DEATH and REAP event + callbacks for a given thread. The actual reaping by the parent + (release_task call) can occur simultaneously + while the thread is still doing the final steps of dying, including + the report_death callback. If a tracing engine + has requested both DEATH and + REAP event reports, it's guaranteed that the + report_reap callback will not be made until + after the report_death callback has returned. + If the report_death callback itself detaches + from the thread, then the report_reap callback + will never be made. Thus it is safe for a + report_death callback to clean up data + structures and detach. + + + + Interlock with final callbacks + + The final sort of guarantee is that a tracing engine will know for sure + whether or not the report_death and/or + report_reap callbacks will be made for a certain + thread. These tear-down races are disambiguated by the error return + values of utrace_set_events and + utrace_control. Normally + utrace_control called with + UTRACE_DETACH returns zero, and this means that no + more callbacks will be made. If the thread is in the midst of dying, + it returns -EALREADY to indicate that the + report_death callback may already be in progress; + when you get this error, you know that any cleanup your + report_death callback does is about to happen or + has just happened--note that if the report_death + callback does not detach, the engine remains attached until the thread + gets reaped. If the thread is in the midst of being reaped, + utrace_control returns -ESRCH + to indicate that the report_reap callback may + already be in progress; this means the engine is implicitly detached + when the callback completes. This makes it possible for a tracing + engine that has decided asynchronously to detach from a thread to + safely clean up its data structures, knowing that no + report_death or report_reap + callback will try to do the same. utrace_detach + returns -ESRCH when the struct + utrace_engine has already been detached, but is + still a valid pointer because of its reference count. A tracing engine + can use this to safely synchronize its own independent multiple threads + of control with each other and with its event callbacks that detach. + + + + In the same vein, utrace_set_events normally + returns zero; if the target thread was stopped before the call, then + after a successful call, no event callbacks not requested in the new + flags will be made. It fails with -EALREADY if + you try to clear UTRACE_EVENT(DEATH) when the + report_death callback may already have begun, or if + you try to newly set UTRACE_EVENT(DEATH) or + UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE) when the target is already + dead or dying. Like utrace_control, it returns + -ESRCH when the report_reap + callback may already have begun, or the thread has already been detached + (including forcible detach on reaping). This lets the tracing engine + know for sure which event callbacks it will or won't see after + utrace_set_events has returned. By checking for + errors, it can know whether to clean up its data structures immediately + or to let its callbacks do the work. + + + + Using <function>utrace_barrier</function> + + When a thread is safely stopped, calling + utrace_control with UTRACE_DETACH + or calling utrace_set_events to disable some events + ensures synchronously that your engine won't get any more of the callbacks + that have been disabled (none at all when detaching). But these can also + be used while the thread is not stopped, when it might be simultaneously + making a callback to your engine. For this situation, these calls return + -EINPROGRESS when it's possible a callback is in + progress. If you are not prepared to have your old callbacks still run, + then you can synchronize to be sure all the old callbacks are finished, + using utrace_barrier. This is necessary if the + kernel module containing your callback code is going to be unloaded. + + + After using UTRACE_DETACH once, further calls to + utrace_control with the same engine pointer will + return -ESRCH. In contrast, after getting + -EINPROGRESS from + utrace_set_events, you can call + utrace_set_events again later and if it returns zero + then know the old callbacks have finished. + + + Unlike all other calls, utrace_barrier (and + utrace_barrier_pid) will accept any engine pointer you + hold a reference on, even if UTRACE_DETACH has already + been used. After any utrace_control or + utrace_set_events call (these do not block), you can + call utrace_barrier to block until callbacks have + finished. This returns -ESRCH only if the engine is + completely detached (finished all callbacks). Otherwise it waits + until the thread is definitely not in the midst of a callback to this + engine and then returns zero, but can return + -ERESTARTSYS if its wait is interrupted. + + + + + + + +utrace core API + + + The utrace API is declared in <linux/utrace.h>. + + +!Iinclude/linux/utrace.h +!Ekernel/utrace.c + + + +Machine State + + + The task_current_syscall function can be used on any + valid struct task_struct at any time, and does + not even require that utrace_attach_task was used at all. + + + + The other ways to access the registers and other machine-dependent state of + a task can only be used on a task that is at a known safe point. The safe + points are all the places where utrace_set_events can + request callbacks (except for the DEATH and + REAP events). So at any event callback, it is safe to + examine current. + + + + One task can examine another only after a callback in the target task that + returns UTRACE_STOP so that task will not return to user + mode after the safe point. This guarantees that the task will not resume + until the same engine uses utrace_control, unless the + task dies suddenly. To examine safely, one must use a pair of calls to + utrace_prepare_examine and + utrace_finish_examine surrounding the calls to + struct user_regset functions or direct examination + of task data structures. utrace_prepare_examine returns + an error if the task is not properly stopped, or is dead. After a + successful examination, the paired utrace_finish_examine + call returns an error if the task ever woke up during the examination. If + so, any data gathered may be scrambled and should be discarded. This means + there was a spurious wake-up (which should not happen), or a sudden death. + + +<structname>struct user_regset</structname> + + + The struct user_regset API + is declared in <linux/regset.h>. + + +!Finclude/linux/regset.h + + + + + <filename>System Call Information</filename> + + + This function is declared in <linux/ptrace.h>. + + +!Elib/syscall.c + + + +<filename>System Call Tracing</filename> + + + The arch API for system call information is declared in + <asm/syscall.h>. + Each of these calls can be used only at system call entry tracing, + or can be used only at system call exit and the subsequent safe points + before returning to user mode. + At system call entry tracing means either during a + report_syscall_entry callback, + or any time after that callback has returned UTRACE_STOP. + + +!Finclude/asm-generic/syscall.h + + + + + +Kernel Internals + + + This chapter covers the interface to the tracing infrastructure + from the core of the kernel and the architecture-specific code. + This is for maintainers of the kernel and arch code, and not relevant + to using the tracing facilities described in preceding chapters. + + +Core Calls In + + + These calls are declared in <linux/tracehook.h>. + The core kernel calls these functions at various important places. + + +!Finclude/linux/tracehook.h + + + +Architecture Calls Out + + + An arch that has done all these things sets + CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK. + This is required to enable the utrace code. + + +<filename><asm/ptrace.h></filename> + + + An arch defines these in <asm/ptrace.h> + if it supports hardware single-step or block-step features. + + +!Finclude/linux/ptrace.h arch_has_single_step arch_has_block_step +!Finclude/linux/ptrace.h user_enable_single_step user_enable_block_step +!Finclude/linux/ptrace.h user_disable_single_step + + + + + <filename><asm/syscall.h></filename> + + + An arch provides <asm/syscall.h> that + defines these as inlines, or declares them as exported functions. + These interfaces are described in . + + + + + + <filename><linux/tracehook.h></filename> + + + An arch must define TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME + and TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE + in its <asm/thread_info.h>. + The arch code must call the following functions, all declared + in <linux/tracehook.h> and + described in : + + + + tracehook_notify_resume + + + tracehook_report_syscall_entry + + + tracehook_report_syscall_exit + + + tracehook_signal_handler + + + + + + + + + + + + diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c index 9b45ee8..496fef3 100644 --- a/fs/proc/array.c +++ b/fs/proc/array.c @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -192,6 +193,8 @@ static inline void task_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns, cred->uid, cred->euid, cred->suid, cred->fsuid, cred->gid, cred->egid, cred->sgid, cred->fsgid); + task_utrace_proc_status(m, p); + task_lock(p); if (p->files) fdt = files_fdtable(p->files); diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index ea15b36..16b6aa4 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1397,6 +1397,11 @@ struct task_struct { #endif seccomp_t seccomp; +#ifdef CONFIG_UTRACE + struct utrace *utrace; + unsigned long utrace_flags; +#endif + /* Thread group tracking */ u32 parent_exec_id; u32 self_exec_id; diff --git a/include/linux/tracehook.h b/include/linux/tracehook.h index c57a138..fd6226a 100644 --- a/include/linux/tracehook.h +++ b/include/linux/tracehook.h @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include struct linux_binprm; /** @@ -63,6 +64,8 @@ struct linux_binprm; */ static inline int tracehook_expect_breakpoints(struct task_struct *task) { + if (unlikely(task_utrace_flags(task) & UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_CORE))) + return 1; return (task_ptrace(task) & PT_PTRACED) != 0; } @@ -111,6 +114,9 @@ static inline void ptrace_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs) static inline __must_check int tracehook_report_syscall_entry( struct pt_regs *regs) { + if ((task_utrace_flags(current) & UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_ENTRY)) && + utrace_report_syscall_entry(regs)) + return 1; ptrace_report_syscall(regs); return 0; } @@ -134,6 +140,9 @@ static inline __must_check int tracehook_report_syscall_entry( */ static inline void tracehook_report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, int step) { + if (task_utrace_flags(current) & UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_EXIT)) + utrace_report_syscall_exit(regs); + if (step && (task_ptrace(current) & PT_PTRACED)) { siginfo_t info; user_single_step_siginfo(current, regs, &info); @@ -201,6 +210,8 @@ static inline void tracehook_report_exec(struct linux_binfmt *fmt, struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct pt_regs *regs) { + if (unlikely(task_utrace_flags(current) & UTRACE_EVENT(EXEC))) + utrace_report_exec(fmt, bprm, regs); if (!ptrace_event(PT_TRACE_EXEC, PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, 0) && unlikely(task_ptrace(current) & PT_PTRACED)) send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 0); @@ -218,10 +229,37 @@ static inline void tracehook_report_exec(struct linux_binfmt *fmt, */ static inline void tracehook_report_exit(long *exit_code) { + if (unlikely(task_utrace_flags(current) & UTRACE_EVENT(EXIT))) + utrace_report_exit(exit_code); ptrace_event(PT_TRACE_EXIT, PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT, *exit_code); } /** + * tracehook_init_task - task_struct has just been copied + * @task: new &struct task_struct just copied from parent + * + * Called from do_fork() when @task has just been duplicated. + * After this, @task will be passed to tracehook_free_task() + * even if the rest of its setup fails before it is fully created. + */ +static inline void tracehook_init_task(struct task_struct *task) +{ + utrace_init_task(task); +} + +/** + * tracehook_free_task - task_struct is being freed + * @task: dead &struct task_struct being freed + * + * Called from free_task() when @task is no longer in use. + */ +static inline void tracehook_free_task(struct task_struct *task) +{ + if (task_utrace_struct(task)) + utrace_free_task(task); +} + +/** * tracehook_prepare_clone - prepare for new child to be cloned * @clone_flags: %CLONE_* flags from clone/fork/vfork system call * @@ -285,6 +323,8 @@ static inline void tracehook_report_clone(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long clone_flags, pid_t pid, struct task_struct *child) { + if (unlikely(task_utrace_flags(current) & UTRACE_EVENT(CLONE))) + utrace_report_clone(clone_flags, child); if (unlikely(task_ptrace(child))) { /* * It doesn't matter who attached/attaching to this @@ -317,6 +357,9 @@ static inline void tracehook_report_clone_complete(int trace, pid_t pid, struct task_struct *child) { + if (unlikely(task_utrace_flags(current) & UTRACE_EVENT(CLONE)) && + (clone_flags & CLONE_VFORK)) + utrace_finish_vfork(current); if (unlikely(trace)) ptrace_event(0, trace, pid); } @@ -351,6 +394,10 @@ static inline void tracehook_report_vfork_done(struct task_struct *child, */ static inline void tracehook_prepare_release_task(struct task_struct *task) { + /* see utrace_add_engine() about this barrier */ + smp_mb(); + if (task_utrace_flags(task)) + utrace_maybe_reap(task, task_utrace_struct(task), true); } /** @@ -365,6 +412,7 @@ static inline void tracehook_prepare_release_task(struct task_struct *task) static inline void tracehook_finish_release_task(struct task_struct *task) { ptrace_release_task(task); + BUG_ON(task->exit_state != EXIT_DEAD); } /** @@ -386,6 +434,8 @@ static inline void tracehook_signal_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, const struct k_sigaction *ka, struct pt_regs *regs, int stepping) { + if (task_utrace_flags(current)) + utrace_signal_handler(current, stepping); if (stepping && (task_ptrace(current) & PT_PTRACED)) ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP); } @@ -403,6 +453,8 @@ static inline void tracehook_signal_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, static inline int tracehook_consider_ignored_signal(struct task_struct *task, int sig) { + if (unlikely(task_utrace_flags(task) & UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_IGN))) + return 1; return (task_ptrace(task) & PT_PTRACED) != 0; } @@ -422,6 +474,9 @@ static inline int tracehook_consider_ignored_signal(struct task_struct *task, static inline int tracehook_consider_fatal_signal(struct task_struct *task, int sig) { + if (unlikely(task_utrace_flags(task) & (UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_TERM) | + UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_CORE)))) + return 1; return (task_ptrace(task) & PT_PTRACED) != 0; } @@ -436,6 +491,8 @@ static inline int tracehook_consider_fatal_signal(struct task_struct *task, */ static inline int tracehook_force_sigpending(void) { + if (unlikely(task_utrace_flags(current))) + return utrace_interrupt_pending(); return 0; } @@ -465,6 +522,8 @@ static inline int tracehook_get_signal(struct task_struct *task, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *return_ka) { + if (unlikely(task_utrace_flags(task))) + return utrace_get_signal(task, regs, info, return_ka); return 0; } @@ -492,6 +551,8 @@ static inline int tracehook_get_signal(struct task_struct *task, */ static inline int tracehook_notify_jctl(int notify, int why) { + if (task_utrace_flags(current) & UTRACE_EVENT(JCTL)) + utrace_report_jctl(notify, why); return notify ?: task_ptrace(current) ? why : 0; } @@ -502,6 +563,8 @@ static inline int tracehook_notify_jctl(int notify, int why) */ static inline void tracehook_finish_jctl(void) { + if (task_utrace_flags(current)) + utrace_finish_stop(); } #define DEATH_REAP -1 @@ -524,6 +587,8 @@ static inline void tracehook_finish_jctl(void) static inline int tracehook_notify_death(struct task_struct *task, void **death_cookie, int group_dead) { + *death_cookie = task_utrace_struct(task); + if (task_detached(task)) return task->ptrace ? SIGCHLD : DEATH_REAP; @@ -560,6 +625,15 @@ static inline void tracehook_report_death(struct task_struct *task, int signal, void *death_cookie, int group_dead) { + /* + * If utrace_set_events() was just called to enable + * UTRACE_EVENT(DEATH), then we are obliged to call + * utrace_report_death() and not miss it. utrace_set_events() + * checks @task->exit_state under tasklist_lock to synchronize + * with exit_notify(), the caller. + */ + if (task_utrace_flags(task) & _UTRACE_DEATH_EVENTS) + utrace_report_death(task, death_cookie, group_dead, signal); } #ifdef TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME @@ -589,10 +663,21 @@ static inline void set_notify_resume(struct task_struct *task) * asynchronously, this will be called again before we return to * user mode. * - * Called without locks. + * Called without locks. However, on some machines this may be + * called with interrupts disabled. */ static inline void tracehook_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs) { + struct task_struct *task = current; + /* + * Prevent the following store/load from getting ahead of the + * caller which clears TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME. This pairs with the + * implicit mb() before setting TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME in + * set_notify_resume(). + */ + smp_mb(); + if (task_utrace_flags(task)) + utrace_resume(task, regs); } #endif /* TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME */ diff --git a/include/linux/utrace.h b/include/linux/utrace.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f251efe --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/utrace.h @@ -0,0 +1,692 @@ +/* + * utrace infrastructure interface for debugging user processes + * + * Copyright (C) 2006-2009 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved. + * + * This copyrighted material is made available to anyone wishing to use, + * modify, copy, or redistribute it subject to the terms and conditions + * of the GNU General Public License v.2. + * + * Red Hat Author: Roland McGrath. + * + * This interface allows for notification of interesting events in a + * thread. It also mediates access to thread state such as registers. + * Multiple unrelated users can be associated with a single thread. + * We call each of these a tracing engine. + * + * A tracing engine starts by calling utrace_attach_task() or + * utrace_attach_pid() on the chosen thread, passing in a set of hooks + * (&struct utrace_engine_ops), and some associated data. This produces a + * &struct utrace_engine, which is the handle used for all other + * operations. An attached engine has its ops vector, its data, and an + * event mask controlled by utrace_set_events(). + * + * For each event bit that is set, that engine will get the + * appropriate ops->report_*() callback when the event occurs. The + * &struct utrace_engine_ops need not provide callbacks for an event + * unless the engine sets one of the associated event bits. + */ + +#ifndef _LINUX_UTRACE_H +#define _LINUX_UTRACE_H 1 + +#include +#include +#include +#include + +struct linux_binprm; +struct pt_regs; +struct utrace; +struct user_regset; +struct user_regset_view; + +/* + * Event bits passed to utrace_set_events(). + * These appear in &struct task_struct. at utrace_flags + * and &struct utrace_engine. at flags. + */ +enum utrace_events { + _UTRACE_EVENT_QUIESCE, /* Thread is available for examination. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_REAP, /* Zombie reaped, no more tracing possible. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_CLONE, /* Successful clone/fork/vfork just done. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, /* Successful execve just completed. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_EXIT, /* Thread exit in progress. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_DEATH, /* Thread has died. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL_ENTRY, /* User entered kernel for system call. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL_EXIT, /* Returning to user after system call. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL, /* Signal delivery will run a user handler. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL_IGN, /* No-op signal to be delivered. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL_STOP, /* Signal delivery will suspend. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL_TERM, /* Signal delivery will terminate. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL_CORE, /* Signal delivery will dump core. */ + _UTRACE_EVENT_JCTL, /* Job control stop or continue completed. */ + _UTRACE_NEVENTS +}; +#define UTRACE_EVENT(type) (1UL << _UTRACE_EVENT_##type) + +/* + * All the kinds of signal events. + * These all use the @report_signal() callback. + */ +#define UTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL_ALL (UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL) \ + | UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_IGN) \ + | UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_STOP) \ + | UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_TERM) \ + | UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_CORE)) +/* + * Both kinds of syscall events; these call the @report_syscall_entry() + * and @report_syscall_exit() callbacks, respectively. + */ +#define UTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL \ + (UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_ENTRY) | UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_EXIT)) + +/* + * The event reports triggered synchronously by task death. + */ +#define _UTRACE_DEATH_EVENTS (UTRACE_EVENT(DEATH) | UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE)) + +/* + * Hooks in call these entry points to the utrace dispatch. + */ +void utrace_free_task(struct task_struct *); +bool utrace_interrupt_pending(void); +void utrace_resume(struct task_struct *, struct pt_regs *); +void utrace_finish_stop(void); +void utrace_maybe_reap(struct task_struct *, struct utrace *, bool); +int utrace_get_signal(struct task_struct *, struct pt_regs *, + siginfo_t *, struct k_sigaction *); +void utrace_report_clone(unsigned long, struct task_struct *); +void utrace_finish_vfork(struct task_struct *); +void utrace_report_exit(long *exit_code); +void utrace_report_death(struct task_struct *, struct utrace *, bool, int); +void utrace_report_jctl(int notify, int type); +void utrace_report_exec(struct linux_binfmt *, struct linux_binprm *, + struct pt_regs *regs); +bool utrace_report_syscall_entry(struct pt_regs *); +void utrace_report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *); +void utrace_signal_handler(struct task_struct *, int); + +#ifndef CONFIG_UTRACE + +/* + * uses these accessors to avoid #ifdef CONFIG_UTRACE. + */ +static inline unsigned long task_utrace_flags(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return 0; +} +static inline struct utrace *task_utrace_struct(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return NULL; +} +static inline void utrace_init_task(struct task_struct *child) +{ +} + +static inline void task_utrace_proc_status(struct seq_file *m, + struct task_struct *p) +{ +} + +#else /* CONFIG_UTRACE */ + +static inline unsigned long task_utrace_flags(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->utrace_flags; +} + +static inline struct utrace *task_utrace_struct(struct task_struct *task) +{ + struct utrace *utrace; + + /* + * This barrier ensures that any prior load of task->utrace_flags + * is ordered before this load of task->utrace. We use those + * utrace_flags checks in the hot path to decide to call into + * the utrace code. The first attach installs task->utrace before + * setting task->utrace_flags nonzero with implicit barrier in + * between, see utrace_add_engine(). + */ + smp_rmb(); + utrace = task->utrace; + + smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* See utrace_task_alloc(). */ + return utrace; +} + +static inline void utrace_init_task(struct task_struct *task) +{ + task->utrace_flags = 0; + task->utrace = NULL; +} + +void task_utrace_proc_status(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *p); + + +/* + * Version number of the API defined in this file. This will change + * whenever a tracing engine's code would need some updates to keep + * working. We maintain this here for the benefit of tracing engine code + * that is developed concurrently with utrace API improvements before they + * are merged into the kernel, making LINUX_VERSION_CODE checks unwieldy. + */ +#define UTRACE_API_VERSION 20091216 + +/** + * enum utrace_resume_action - engine's choice of action for a traced task + * @UTRACE_STOP: Stay quiescent after callbacks. + * @UTRACE_INTERRUPT: Make @report_signal() callback soon. + * @UTRACE_REPORT: Make some callback soon. + * @UTRACE_SINGLESTEP: Resume in user mode for one instruction. + * @UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP: Resume in user mode until next branch. + * @UTRACE_RESUME: Resume normally in user mode. + * @UTRACE_DETACH: Detach my engine (implies %UTRACE_RESUME). + * + * See utrace_control() for detailed descriptions of each action. This is + * encoded in the @action argument and the return value for every callback + * with a &u32 return value. + * + * The order of these is important. When there is more than one engine, + * each supplies its choice and the smallest value prevails. + */ +enum utrace_resume_action { + UTRACE_STOP, + UTRACE_INTERRUPT, + UTRACE_REPORT, + UTRACE_SINGLESTEP, + UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP, + UTRACE_RESUME, + UTRACE_DETACH, + UTRACE_RESUME_MAX +}; +#define UTRACE_RESUME_BITS (ilog2(UTRACE_RESUME_MAX) + 1) +#define UTRACE_RESUME_MASK ((1 << UTRACE_RESUME_BITS) - 1) + +/** + * utrace_resume_action - &enum utrace_resume_action from callback action + * @action: &u32 callback @action argument or return value + * + * This extracts the &enum utrace_resume_action from @action, + * which is the @action argument to a &struct utrace_engine_ops + * callback or the return value from one. + */ +static inline enum utrace_resume_action utrace_resume_action(u32 action) +{ + return action & UTRACE_RESUME_MASK; +} + +/** + * enum utrace_signal_action - disposition of signal + * @UTRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVER: Deliver according to sigaction. + * @UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN: Ignore the signal. + * @UTRACE_SIGNAL_TERM: Terminate the process. + * @UTRACE_SIGNAL_CORE: Terminate with core dump. + * @UTRACE_SIGNAL_STOP: Deliver as absolute stop. + * @UTRACE_SIGNAL_TSTP: Deliver as job control stop. + * @UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT: Reporting before pending signals. + * @UTRACE_SIGNAL_HANDLER: Reporting after signal handler setup. + * + * This is encoded in the @action argument and the return value for + * a @report_signal() callback. It says what will happen to the + * signal described by the &siginfo_t parameter to the callback. + * + * The %UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT value is used in an @action argument when + * a tracing report is being made before dequeuing any pending signal. + * If this is immediately after a signal handler has been set up, then + * %UTRACE_SIGNAL_HANDLER is used instead. A @report_signal callback + * that uses %UTRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVER|%UTRACE_SINGLESTEP will ensure + * it sees a %UTRACE_SIGNAL_HANDLER report. + */ +enum utrace_signal_action { + UTRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVER = 0x00, + UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN = 0x10, + UTRACE_SIGNAL_TERM = 0x20, + UTRACE_SIGNAL_CORE = 0x30, + UTRACE_SIGNAL_STOP = 0x40, + UTRACE_SIGNAL_TSTP = 0x50, + UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT = 0x60, + UTRACE_SIGNAL_HANDLER = 0x70 +}; +#define UTRACE_SIGNAL_MASK 0xf0 +#define UTRACE_SIGNAL_HOLD 0x100 /* Flag, push signal back on queue. */ + +/** + * utrace_signal_action - &enum utrace_signal_action from callback action + * @action: @report_signal callback @action argument or return value + * + * This extracts the &enum utrace_signal_action from @action, which + * is the @action argument to a @report_signal callback or the + * return value from one. + */ +static inline enum utrace_signal_action utrace_signal_action(u32 action) +{ + return action & UTRACE_SIGNAL_MASK; +} + +/** + * enum utrace_syscall_action - disposition of system call attempt + * @UTRACE_SYSCALL_RUN: Run the system call. + * @UTRACE_SYSCALL_ABORT: Don't run the system call. + * + * This is encoded in the @action argument and the return value for + * a @report_syscall_entry callback. + */ +enum utrace_syscall_action { + UTRACE_SYSCALL_RUN = 0x00, + UTRACE_SYSCALL_ABORT = 0x10 +}; +#define UTRACE_SYSCALL_MASK 0xf0 +#define UTRACE_SYSCALL_RESUMED 0x100 /* Flag, report_syscall_entry() repeats */ + +/** + * utrace_syscall_action - &enum utrace_syscall_action from callback action + * @action: @report_syscall_entry callback @action or return value + * + * This extracts the &enum utrace_syscall_action from @action, which + * is the @action argument to a @report_syscall_entry callback or the + * return value from one. + */ +static inline enum utrace_syscall_action utrace_syscall_action(u32 action) +{ + return action & UTRACE_SYSCALL_MASK; +} + +/* + * Flags for utrace_attach_task() and utrace_attach_pid(). + */ +#define UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_OPS 0x0001 /* Match engines on ops. */ +#define UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_DATA 0x0002 /* Match engines on data. */ +#define UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_MASK 0x000f +#define UTRACE_ATTACH_CREATE 0x0010 /* Attach a new engine. */ +#define UTRACE_ATTACH_EXCLUSIVE 0x0020 /* Refuse if existing match. */ + +/** + * struct utrace_engine - per-engine structure + * @ops: &struct utrace_engine_ops pointer passed to utrace_attach_task() + * @data: engine-private &void * passed to utrace_attach_task() + * @flags: event mask set by utrace_set_events() plus internal flag bits + * + * The task itself never has to worry about engines detaching while + * it's doing event callbacks. These structures are removed from the + * task's active list only when it's stopped, or by the task itself. + * + * utrace_engine_get() and utrace_engine_put() maintain a reference count. + * When it drops to zero, the structure is freed. One reference is held + * implicitly while the engine is attached to its task. + */ +struct utrace_engine { +/* private: */ + struct kref kref; + void (*release)(void *); + struct list_head entry; + +/* public: */ + const struct utrace_engine_ops *ops; + void *data; + + unsigned long flags; +}; + +/** + * utrace_engine_get - acquire a reference on a &struct utrace_engine + * @engine: &struct utrace_engine pointer + * + * You must hold a reference on @engine, and you get another. + */ +static inline void utrace_engine_get(struct utrace_engine *engine) +{ + kref_get(&engine->kref); +} + +void __utrace_engine_release(struct kref *); + +/** + * utrace_engine_put - release a reference on a &struct utrace_engine + * @engine: &struct utrace_engine pointer + * + * You must hold a reference on @engine, and you lose that reference. + * If it was the last one, @engine becomes an invalid pointer. + */ +static inline void utrace_engine_put(struct utrace_engine *engine) +{ + kref_put(&engine->kref, __utrace_engine_release); +} + +/** + * struct utrace_engine_ops - tracing engine callbacks + * + * Each @report_*() callback corresponds to an %UTRACE_EVENT(*) bit. + * utrace_set_events() calls on @engine choose which callbacks will + * be made to @engine from @task. + * + * Most callbacks take an @action argument, giving the resume action + * chosen by other tracing engines. All callbacks take an @engine + * argument. The @report_reap callback takes a @task argument that + * might or might not be @current. All other @report_* callbacks + * report an event in the @current task. + * + * For some calls, @action also includes bits specific to that event + * and utrace_resume_action() is used to extract the resume action. + * This shows what would happen if @engine wasn't there, or will if + * the callback's return value uses %UTRACE_RESUME. This always + * starts as %UTRACE_RESUME when no other tracing is being done on + * this task. + * + * All return values contain &enum utrace_resume_action bits. For + * some calls, other bits specific to that kind of event are added to + * the resume action bits with OR. These are the same bits used in + * the @action argument. The resume action returned by a callback + * does not override previous engines' choices, it only says what + * @engine wants done. What @current actually does is the action that's + * most constrained among the choices made by all attached engines. + * See utrace_control() for more information on the actions. + * + * When %UTRACE_STOP is used in @report_syscall_entry, then @current + * stops before attempting the system call. In this case, another + * @report_syscall_entry callback will follow after @current resumes if + * %UTRACE_REPORT or %UTRACE_INTERRUPT was returned by some callback + * or passed to utrace_control(). In a second or later callback, + * %UTRACE_SYSCALL_RESUMED is set in the @action argument to indicate + * a repeat callback still waiting to attempt the same system call + * invocation. This repeat callback gives each engine an opportunity + * to reexamine registers another engine might have changed while + * @current was held in %UTRACE_STOP. + * + * In other cases, the resume action does not take effect until @current + * is ready to check for signals and return to user mode. If there + * are more callbacks to be made, the last round of calls determines + * the final action. A @report_quiesce callback with @event zero, or + * a @report_signal callback, will always be the last one made before + * @current resumes. Only %UTRACE_STOP is "sticky"--if @engine returned + * %UTRACE_STOP then @current stays stopped unless @engine returns + * different from a following callback. + * + * The report_death() and report_reap() callbacks do not take @action + * arguments, and only %UTRACE_DETACH is meaningful in the return value + * from a report_death() callback. None of the resume actions applies + * to a dead thread. + * + * All @report_*() hooks are called with no locks held, in a generally + * safe environment when we will be returning to user mode soon (or just + * entered the kernel). It is fine to block for memory allocation and + * the like, but all hooks are asynchronous and must not block on + * external events! If you want the thread to block, use %UTRACE_STOP + * in your hook's return value; then later wake it up with utrace_control(). + * + * @report_quiesce: + * Requested by %UTRACE_EVENT(%QUIESCE). + * This does not indicate any event, but just that @current is in a + * safe place for examination. This call is made before each specific + * event callback, except for @report_reap. The @event argument gives + * the %UTRACE_EVENT(@which) value for the event occurring. This + * callback might be made for events @engine has not requested, if + * some other engine is tracing the event; calling utrace_set_events() + * call here can request the immediate callback for this occurrence of + * @event. @event is zero when there is no other event, @current is + * now ready to check for signals and return to user mode, and some + * engine has used %UTRACE_REPORT or %UTRACE_INTERRUPT to request this + * callback. For this case, if @report_signal is not %NULL, the + * @report_quiesce callback may be replaced with a @report_signal + * callback passing %UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT in its @action argument, + * whenever @current is entering the signal-check path anyway. + * + * @report_signal: + * Requested by %UTRACE_EVENT(%SIGNAL_*) or %UTRACE_EVENT(%QUIESCE). + * Use utrace_signal_action() and utrace_resume_action() on @action. + * The signal action is %UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT when some engine has + * used %UTRACE_REPORT or %UTRACE_INTERRUPT; the callback can choose + * to stop or to deliver an artificial signal, before pending signals. + * It's %UTRACE_SIGNAL_HANDLER instead when signal handler setup just + * finished (after a previous %UTRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVER return); this + * serves in lieu of any %UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT callback requested by + * %UTRACE_REPORT or %UTRACE_INTERRUPT, and is also implicitly + * requested by %UTRACE_SINGLESTEP or %UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP into the + * signal delivery. The other signal actions indicate a signal about + * to be delivered; the previous engine's return value sets the signal + * action seen by the the following engine's callback. The @info data + * can be changed at will, including @info->si_signo. The settings in + * @return_ka determines what %UTRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVER does. @orig_ka + * is what was in force before other tracing engines intervened, and + * it's %NULL when this report began as %UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT or + * %UTRACE_SIGNAL_HANDLER. For a report without a new signal, @info + * is left uninitialized and must be set completely by an engine that + * chooses to deliver a signal; if there was a previous @report_signal + * callback ending in %UTRACE_STOP and it was just resumed using + * %UTRACE_REPORT or %UTRACE_INTERRUPT, then @info is left unchanged + * from the previous callback. In this way, the original signal can + * be left in @info while returning %UTRACE_STOP|%UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN + * and then found again when resuming with %UTRACE_INTERRUPT. + * The %UTRACE_SIGNAL_HOLD flag bit can be OR'd into the return value, + * and might be in @action if the previous engine returned it. This + * flag asks that the signal in @info be pushed back on @current's queue + * so that it will be seen again after whatever action is taken now. + * + * @report_clone: + * Requested by %UTRACE_EVENT(%CLONE). + * Event reported for parent, before the new task @child might run. + * @clone_flags gives the flags used in the clone system call, or + * equivalent flags for a fork() or vfork() system call. This + * function can use utrace_attach_task() on @child. Then passing + * %UTRACE_STOP to utrace_control() on @child here keeps the child + * stopped before it ever runs in user mode, %UTRACE_REPORT or + * %UTRACE_INTERRUPT ensures a callback from @child before it + * starts in user mode. + * + * @report_jctl: + * Requested by %UTRACE_EVENT(%JCTL). + * Job control event; @type is %CLD_STOPPED or %CLD_CONTINUED, + * indicating whether we are stopping or resuming now. If @notify + * is nonzero, @current is the last thread to stop and so will send + * %SIGCHLD to its parent after this callback; @notify reflects + * what the parent's %SIGCHLD has in @si_code, which can sometimes + * be %CLD_STOPPED even when @type is %CLD_CONTINUED. + * + * @report_exec: + * Requested by %UTRACE_EVENT(%EXEC). + * An execve system call has succeeded and the new program is about to + * start running. The initial user register state is handy to be tweaked + * directly in @regs. @fmt and @bprm gives the details of this exec. + * + * @report_syscall_entry: + * Requested by %UTRACE_EVENT(%SYSCALL_ENTRY). + * Thread has entered the kernel to request a system call. + * The user register state is handy to be tweaked directly in @regs. + * The @action argument contains an &enum utrace_syscall_action, + * use utrace_syscall_action() to extract it. The return value + * overrides the last engine's action for the system call. + * If the final action is %UTRACE_SYSCALL_ABORT, no system call + * is made. The details of the system call being attempted can + * be fetched here with syscall_get_nr() and syscall_get_arguments(). + * The parameter registers can be changed with syscall_set_arguments(). + * See above about the %UTRACE_SYSCALL_RESUMED flag in @action. + * Use %UTRACE_REPORT in the return value to guarantee you get + * another callback (with %UTRACE_SYSCALL_RESUMED flag) in case + * @current stops with %UTRACE_STOP before attempting the system call. + * + * @report_syscall_exit: + * Requested by %UTRACE_EVENT(%SYSCALL_EXIT). + * Thread is about to leave the kernel after a system call request. + * The user register state is handy to be tweaked directly in @regs. + * The results of the system call attempt can be examined here using + * syscall_get_error() and syscall_get_return_value(). It is safe + * here to call syscall_set_return_value() or syscall_rollback(). + * + * @report_exit: + * Requested by %UTRACE_EVENT(%EXIT). + * Thread is exiting and cannot be prevented from doing so, + * but all its state is still live. The @code value will be + * the wait result seen by the parent, and can be changed by + * this engine or others. The @orig_code value is the real + * status, not changed by any tracing engine. Returning %UTRACE_STOP + * here keeps @current stopped before it cleans up its state and dies, + * so it can be examined by other processes. When @current is allowed + * to run, it will die and get to the @report_death callback. + * + * @report_death: + * Requested by %UTRACE_EVENT(%DEATH). + * Thread is really dead now. It might be reaped by its parent at + * any time, or self-reap immediately. Though the actual reaping + * may happen in parallel, a report_reap() callback will always be + * ordered after a report_death() callback. + * + * @report_reap: + * Requested by %UTRACE_EVENT(%REAP). + * Called when someone reaps the dead task (parent, init, or self). + * This means the parent called wait, or else this was a detached + * thread or a process whose parent ignores SIGCHLD. + * No more callbacks are made after this one. + * The engine is always detached. + * There is nothing more a tracing engine can do about this thread. + * After this callback, the @engine pointer will become invalid. + * The @task pointer may become invalid if get_task_struct() hasn't + * been used to keep it alive. + * An engine should always request this callback if it stores the + * @engine pointer or stores any pointer in @engine->data, so it + * can clean up its data structures. + * Unlike other callbacks, this can be called from the parent's context + * rather than from the traced thread itself--it must not delay the + * parent by blocking. + * + * @release: + * If not %NULL, this is called after the last utrace_engine_put() + * call for a &struct utrace_engine, which could be implicit after + * a %UTRACE_DETACH return from another callback. Its argument is + * the engine's @data member. + */ +struct utrace_engine_ops { + u32 (*report_quiesce)(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + unsigned long event); + u32 (*report_signal)(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + struct pt_regs *regs, + siginfo_t *info, + const struct k_sigaction *orig_ka, + struct k_sigaction *return_ka); + u32 (*report_clone)(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + unsigned long clone_flags, + struct task_struct *child); + u32 (*report_jctl)(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + int type, int notify); + u32 (*report_exec)(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + const struct linux_binfmt *fmt, + const struct linux_binprm *bprm, + struct pt_regs *regs); + u32 (*report_syscall_entry)(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + struct pt_regs *regs); + u32 (*report_syscall_exit)(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + struct pt_regs *regs); + u32 (*report_exit)(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + long orig_code, long *code); + u32 (*report_death)(struct utrace_engine *engine, + bool group_dead, int signal); + void (*report_reap)(struct utrace_engine *engine, + struct task_struct *task); + void (*release)(void *data); +}; + +/** + * struct utrace_examiner - private state for using utrace_prepare_examine() + * + * The members of &struct utrace_examiner are private to the implementation. + * This data type holds the state from a call to utrace_prepare_examine() + * to be used by a call to utrace_finish_examine(). + */ +struct utrace_examiner { +/* private: */ + long state; + unsigned long ncsw; +}; + +/* + * These are the exported entry points for tracing engines to use. + * See kernel/utrace.c for their kerneldoc comments with interface details. + */ +struct utrace_engine *utrace_attach_task(struct task_struct *, int, + const struct utrace_engine_ops *, + void *); +struct utrace_engine *utrace_attach_pid(struct pid *, int, + const struct utrace_engine_ops *, + void *); +int __must_check utrace_control(struct task_struct *, + struct utrace_engine *, + enum utrace_resume_action); +int __must_check utrace_set_events(struct task_struct *, + struct utrace_engine *, + unsigned long eventmask); +int __must_check utrace_barrier(struct task_struct *, + struct utrace_engine *); +int __must_check utrace_prepare_examine(struct task_struct *, + struct utrace_engine *, + struct utrace_examiner *); +int __must_check utrace_finish_examine(struct task_struct *, + struct utrace_engine *, + struct utrace_examiner *); + +/** + * utrace_control_pid - control a thread being traced by a tracing engine + * @pid: thread to affect + * @engine: attached engine to affect + * @action: &enum utrace_resume_action for thread to do + * + * This is the same as utrace_control(), but takes a &struct pid + * pointer rather than a &struct task_struct pointer. The caller must + * hold a ref on @pid, but does not need to worry about the task + * staying valid. If it's been reaped so that @pid points nowhere, + * then this call returns -%ESRCH. + */ +static inline __must_check int utrace_control_pid( + struct pid *pid, struct utrace_engine *engine, + enum utrace_resume_action action) +{ + /* + * We don't bother with rcu_read_lock() here to protect the + * task_struct pointer, because utrace_control will return + * -ESRCH without looking at that pointer if the engine is + * already detached. A task_struct pointer can't die before + * all the engines are detached in release_task() first. + */ + struct task_struct *task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID); + return unlikely(!task) ? -ESRCH : utrace_control(task, engine, action); +} + +/** + * utrace_set_events_pid - choose which event reports a tracing engine gets + * @pid: thread to affect + * @engine: attached engine to affect + * @eventmask: new event mask + * + * This is the same as utrace_set_events(), but takes a &struct pid + * pointer rather than a &struct task_struct pointer. The caller must + * hold a ref on @pid, but does not need to worry about the task + * staying valid. If it's been reaped so that @pid points nowhere, + * then this call returns -%ESRCH. + */ +static inline __must_check int utrace_set_events_pid( + struct pid *pid, struct utrace_engine *engine, unsigned long eventmask) +{ + struct task_struct *task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID); + return unlikely(!task) ? -ESRCH : + utrace_set_events(task, engine, eventmask); +} + +/** + * utrace_barrier_pid - synchronize with simultaneous tracing callbacks + * @pid: thread to affect + * @engine: engine to affect (can be detached) + * + * This is the same as utrace_barrier(), but takes a &struct pid + * pointer rather than a &struct task_struct pointer. The caller must + * hold a ref on @pid, but does not need to worry about the task + * staying valid. If it's been reaped so that @pid points nowhere, + * then this call returns -%ESRCH. + */ +static inline __must_check int utrace_barrier_pid(struct pid *pid, + struct utrace_engine *engine) +{ + struct task_struct *task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID); + return unlikely(!task) ? -ESRCH : utrace_barrier(task, engine); +} + +#endif /* CONFIG_UTRACE */ + +#endif /* linux/utrace.h */ diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig index 412c21b..a03ae51 100644 --- a/init/Kconfig +++ b/init/Kconfig @@ -372,6 +372,15 @@ config AUDIT_TREE depends on AUDITSYSCALL select FSNOTIFY +config UTRACE + bool "Infrastructure for tracing and debugging user processes" + depends on EXPERIMENTAL + depends on HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK + help + Enable the utrace process tracing interface. This is an internal + kernel interface exported to kernel modules, to track events in + user threads, extract and change user thread state. + source "kernel/irq/Kconfig" menu "RCU Subsystem" diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile index 2d64cfc..4a22e81 100644 --- a/kernel/Makefile +++ b/kernel/Makefile @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IKCONFIG) += configs.o obj-$(CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS) += res_counter.o obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += stop_machine.o obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o +obj-$(CONFIG_UTRACE) += utrace.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT) += audit.o auditfilter.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL) += auditsc.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index 0276c30..62caf3d 100644 --- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk) free_thread_info(tsk->stack); rt_mutex_debug_task_free(tsk); ftrace_graph_exit_task(tsk); + tracehook_free_task(tsk); free_task_struct(tsk); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_task); @@ -1095,6 +1096,8 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags, if (!p) goto fork_out; + tracehook_init_task(p); + ftrace_graph_init_task(p); rt_mutex_init_task(p); diff --git a/kernel/utrace.c b/kernel/utrace.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..26d6faf --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/utrace.c @@ -0,0 +1,2440 @@ +/* + * utrace infrastructure interface for debugging user processes + * + * Copyright (C) 2006-2010 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved. + * + * This copyrighted material is made available to anyone wishing to use, + * modify, copy, or redistribute it subject to the terms and conditions + * of the GNU General Public License v.2. + * + * Red Hat Author: Roland McGrath. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + + +/* + * Per-thread structure private to utrace implementation. + * If task_struct.utrace_flags is nonzero, task_struct.utrace + * has always been allocated first. Once allocated, it is + * never freed until free_task(). + * + * The common event reporting loops are done by the task making the + * report without ever taking any locks. To facilitate this, the two + * lists @attached and @attaching work together for smooth asynchronous + * attaching with low overhead. Modifying either list requires @lock. + * The @attaching list can be modified any time while holding @lock. + * New engines being attached always go on this list. + * + * The @attached list is what the task itself uses for its reporting + * loops. When the task itself is not quiescent, it can use the + * @attached list without taking any lock. Nobody may modify the list + * when the task is not quiescent. When it is quiescent, that means + * that it won't run again without taking @lock itself before using + * the list. + * + * At each place where we know the task is quiescent (or it's current), + * while holding @lock, we call splice_attaching(), below. This moves + * the @attaching list members on to the end of the @attached list. + * Since this happens at the start of any reporting pass, any new + * engines attached asynchronously go on the stable @attached list + * in time to have their callbacks seen. + */ +struct utrace { + spinlock_t lock; + struct list_head attached, attaching; + + struct task_struct *cloning; + + struct utrace_engine *reporting; + + enum utrace_resume_action resume:UTRACE_RESUME_BITS; + unsigned int signal_handler:1; + unsigned int vfork_stop:1; /* need utrace_stop() before vfork wait */ + unsigned int death:1; /* in utrace_report_death() now */ + unsigned int reap:1; /* release_task() has run */ + unsigned int pending_attach:1; /* need splice_attaching() */ +}; + +static struct kmem_cache *utrace_cachep; +static struct kmem_cache *utrace_engine_cachep; +static const struct utrace_engine_ops utrace_detached_ops; /* forward decl */ + +static int __init utrace_init(void) +{ + utrace_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(utrace, SLAB_PANIC); + utrace_engine_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(utrace_engine, SLAB_PANIC); + return 0; +} +module_init(utrace_init); + +/* + * Set up @task.utrace for the first time. We can have races + * between two utrace_attach_task() calls here. The task_lock() + * governs installing the new pointer. If another one got in first, + * we just punt the new one we allocated. + * + * This returns false only in case of a memory allocation failure. + */ +static bool utrace_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task) +{ + struct utrace *utrace = kmem_cache_zalloc(utrace_cachep, GFP_KERNEL); + if (unlikely(!utrace)) + return false; + spin_lock_init(&utrace->lock); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&utrace->attached); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&utrace->attaching); + utrace->resume = UTRACE_RESUME; + task_lock(task); + if (likely(!task->utrace)) { + /* + * This barrier makes sure the initialization of the struct + * precedes the installation of the pointer. This pairs + * with smp_read_barrier_depends() in task_utrace_struct(). + */ + smp_wmb(); + task->utrace = utrace; + } + task_unlock(task); + + if (unlikely(task->utrace != utrace)) + kmem_cache_free(utrace_cachep, utrace); + return true; +} + +/* + * This is called via tracehook_free_task() from free_task() + * when @task is being deallocated. + */ +void utrace_free_task(struct task_struct *task) +{ + kmem_cache_free(utrace_cachep, task->utrace); +} + +/* + * This is calledwhen the task is safely quiescent, i.e. it won't consult + * utrace->attached without the lock. Move any engines attached + * asynchronously from @utrace->attaching onto the @utrace->attached list. + */ +static void splice_attaching(struct utrace *utrace) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&utrace->lock); + list_splice_tail_init(&utrace->attaching, &utrace->attached); + utrace->pending_attach = 0; +} + +/* + * This is the exported function used by the utrace_engine_put() inline. + */ +void __utrace_engine_release(struct kref *kref) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine = container_of(kref, struct utrace_engine, + kref); + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&engine->entry)); + if (engine->release) + (*engine->release)(engine->data); + kmem_cache_free(utrace_engine_cachep, engine); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__utrace_engine_release); + +static bool engine_matches(struct utrace_engine *engine, int flags, + const struct utrace_engine_ops *ops, void *data) +{ + if ((flags & UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_OPS) && engine->ops != ops) + return false; + if ((flags & UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_DATA) && engine->data != data) + return false; + return engine->ops && engine->ops != &utrace_detached_ops; +} + +static struct utrace_engine *find_matching_engine( + struct utrace *utrace, int flags, + const struct utrace_engine_ops *ops, void *data) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine; + list_for_each_entry(engine, &utrace->attached, entry) + if (engine_matches(engine, flags, ops, data)) + return engine; + list_for_each_entry(engine, &utrace->attaching, entry) + if (engine_matches(engine, flags, ops, data)) + return engine; + return NULL; +} + +/* + * Enqueue @engine, or maybe don't if UTRACE_ATTACH_EXCLUSIVE. + */ +static int utrace_add_engine(struct task_struct *target, + struct utrace *utrace, + struct utrace_engine *engine, + int flags, + const struct utrace_engine_ops *ops, + void *data) +{ + int ret; + + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + + ret = -EEXIST; + if ((flags & UTRACE_ATTACH_EXCLUSIVE) && + unlikely(find_matching_engine(utrace, flags, ops, data))) + goto unlock; + + /* + * In case we had no engines before, make sure that + * utrace_flags is not zero. Since we did unlock+lock + * at least once after utrace_task_alloc() installed + * ->utrace, we have the necessary barrier which pairs + * with rmb() in task_utrace_struct(). + */ + ret = -ESRCH; + if (!target->utrace_flags) { + target->utrace_flags = UTRACE_EVENT(REAP); + /* + * If we race with tracehook_prepare_release_task() + * make sure that either it sees utrace_flags != 0 + * or we see exit_state == EXIT_DEAD. + */ + smp_mb(); + if (unlikely(target->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD)) { + target->utrace_flags = 0; + goto unlock; + } + } + + /* + * Put the new engine on the pending ->attaching list. + * Make sure it gets onto the ->attached list by the next + * time it's examined. Setting ->pending_attach ensures + * that start_report() takes the lock and splices the lists + * before the next new reporting pass. + * + * When target == current, it would be safe just to call + * splice_attaching() right here. But if we're inside a + * callback, that would mean the new engine also gets + * notified about the event that precipitated its own + * creation. This is not what the user wants. + */ + list_add_tail(&engine->entry, &utrace->attaching); + utrace->pending_attach = 1; + utrace_engine_get(engine); + ret = 0; +unlock: + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + + return ret; +} + +/** + * utrace_attach_task - attach new engine, or look up an attached engine + * @target: thread to attach to + * @flags: flag bits combined with OR, see below + * @ops: callback table for new engine + * @data: engine private data pointer + * + * The caller must ensure that the @target thread does not get freed, + * i.e. hold a ref or be its parent. It is always safe to call this + * on @current, or on the @child pointer in a @report_clone callback. + * For most other cases, it's easier to use utrace_attach_pid() instead. + * + * UTRACE_ATTACH_CREATE: + * Create a new engine. If %UTRACE_ATTACH_CREATE is not specified, you + * only look up an existing engine already attached to the thread. + * + * UTRACE_ATTACH_EXCLUSIVE: + * Attempting to attach a second (matching) engine fails with -%EEXIST. + * + * UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_OPS: Only consider engines matching @ops. + * UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_DATA: Only consider engines matching @data. + * + * Calls with neither %UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_OPS nor %UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_DATA + * match the first among any engines attached to @target. That means that + * %UTRACE_ATTACH_EXCLUSIVE in such a call fails with -%EEXIST if there + * are any engines on @target at all. + */ +struct utrace_engine *utrace_attach_task( + struct task_struct *target, int flags, + const struct utrace_engine_ops *ops, void *data) +{ + struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(target); + struct utrace_engine *engine; + int ret; + + if (!(flags & UTRACE_ATTACH_CREATE)) { + if (unlikely(!utrace)) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + engine = find_matching_engine(utrace, flags, ops, data); + if (engine) + utrace_engine_get(engine); + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + return engine ?: ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); + } + + if (unlikely(!ops) || unlikely(ops == &utrace_detached_ops)) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + if (unlikely(target->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) + /* + * Silly kernel, utrace is for users! + */ + return ERR_PTR(-EPERM); + + if (!utrace) { + if (unlikely(!utrace_task_alloc(target))) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + utrace = task_utrace_struct(target); + } + + engine = kmem_cache_alloc(utrace_engine_cachep, GFP_KERNEL); + if (unlikely(!engine)) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + /* + * Initialize the new engine structure. It starts out with one ref + * to return. utrace_add_engine() adds another for being attached. + */ + kref_init(&engine->kref); + engine->flags = 0; + engine->ops = ops; + engine->data = data; + engine->release = ops->release; + + ret = utrace_add_engine(target, utrace, engine, flags, ops, data); + + if (unlikely(ret)) { + kmem_cache_free(utrace_engine_cachep, engine); + engine = ERR_PTR(ret); + } + + + return engine; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(utrace_attach_task); + +/** + * utrace_attach_pid - attach new engine, or look up an attached engine + * @pid: &struct pid pointer representing thread to attach to + * @flags: flag bits combined with OR, see utrace_attach_task() + * @ops: callback table for new engine + * @data: engine private data pointer + * + * This is the same as utrace_attach_task(), but takes a &struct pid + * pointer rather than a &struct task_struct pointer. The caller must + * hold a ref on @pid, but does not need to worry about the task + * staying valid. If it's been reaped so that @pid points nowhere, + * then this call returns -%ESRCH. + */ +struct utrace_engine *utrace_attach_pid( + struct pid *pid, int flags, + const struct utrace_engine_ops *ops, void *data) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine = ERR_PTR(-ESRCH); + struct task_struct *task = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID); + if (task) { + engine = utrace_attach_task(task, flags, ops, data); + put_task_struct(task); + } + return engine; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(utrace_attach_pid); + +/* + * When an engine is detached, the target thread may still see it and + * make callbacks until it quiesces. We install a special ops vector + * with these two callbacks. When the target thread quiesces, it can + * safely free the engine itself. For any event we will always get + * the report_quiesce() callback first, so we only need this one + * pointer to be set. The only exception is report_reap(), so we + * supply that callback too. + */ +static u32 utrace_detached_quiesce(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + unsigned long event) +{ + return UTRACE_DETACH; +} + +static void utrace_detached_reap(struct utrace_engine *engine, + struct task_struct *task) +{ +} + +static const struct utrace_engine_ops utrace_detached_ops = { + .report_quiesce = &utrace_detached_quiesce, + .report_reap = &utrace_detached_reap +}; + +/* + * The caller has to hold a ref on the engine. If the attached flag is + * true (all but utrace_barrier() calls), the engine is supposed to be + * attached. If the attached flag is false (utrace_barrier() only), + * then return -ERESTARTSYS for an engine marked for detach but not yet + * fully detached. The task pointer can be invalid if the engine is + * detached. + * + * Get the utrace lock for the target task. + * Returns the struct if locked, or ERR_PTR(-errno). + * + * This has to be robust against races with: + * utrace_control(target, UTRACE_DETACH) calls + * UTRACE_DETACH after reports + * utrace_report_death + * utrace_release_task + */ +static struct utrace *get_utrace_lock(struct task_struct *target, + struct utrace_engine *engine, + bool attached) + __acquires(utrace->lock) +{ + struct utrace *utrace; + + rcu_read_lock(); + + /* + * If this engine was already detached, bail out before we look at + * the task_struct pointer at all. If it's detached after this + * check, then RCU is still keeping this task_struct pointer valid. + * + * The ops pointer is NULL when the engine is fully detached. + * It's &utrace_detached_ops when it's marked detached but still + * on the list. In the latter case, utrace_barrier() still works, + * since the target might be in the middle of an old callback. + */ + if (unlikely(!engine->ops)) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH); + } + + if (unlikely(engine->ops == &utrace_detached_ops)) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + return attached ? ERR_PTR(-ESRCH) : ERR_PTR(-ERESTARTSYS); + } + + utrace = task_utrace_struct(target); + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + if (unlikely(utrace->reap) || unlikely(!engine->ops) || + unlikely(engine->ops == &utrace_detached_ops)) { + /* + * By the time we got the utrace lock, + * it had been reaped or detached already. + */ + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + utrace = ERR_PTR(-ESRCH); + if (!attached && engine->ops == &utrace_detached_ops) + utrace = ERR_PTR(-ERESTARTSYS); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return utrace; +} + +/* + * Now that we don't hold any locks, run through any + * detached engines and free their references. Each + * engine had one implicit ref while it was attached. + */ +static void put_detached_list(struct list_head *list) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine, *next; + list_for_each_entry_safe(engine, next, list, entry) { + list_del_init(&engine->entry); + utrace_engine_put(engine); + } +} + +/* + * We use an extra bit in utrace_engine.flags past the event bits, + * to record whether the engine is keeping the target thread stopped. + * + * This bit is set in task_struct.utrace_flags whenever it is set in any + * engine's flags. Only utrace_reset() resets it in utrace_flags. + */ +#define ENGINE_STOP (1UL << _UTRACE_NEVENTS) + +static void mark_engine_wants_stop(struct task_struct *task, + struct utrace_engine *engine) +{ + engine->flags |= ENGINE_STOP; + task->utrace_flags |= ENGINE_STOP; +} + +static void clear_engine_wants_stop(struct utrace_engine *engine) +{ + engine->flags &= ~ENGINE_STOP; +} + +static bool engine_wants_stop(struct utrace_engine *engine) +{ + return (engine->flags & ENGINE_STOP) != 0; +} + +/** + * utrace_set_events - choose which event reports a tracing engine gets + * @target: thread to affect + * @engine: attached engine to affect + * @events: new event mask + * + * This changes the set of events for which @engine wants callbacks made. + * + * This fails with -%EALREADY and does nothing if you try to clear + * %UTRACE_EVENT(%DEATH) when the @report_death callback may already have + * begun, or if you try to newly set %UTRACE_EVENT(%DEATH) or + * %UTRACE_EVENT(%QUIESCE) when @target is already dead or dying. + * + * This fails with -%ESRCH if you try to clear %UTRACE_EVENT(%REAP) when + * the @report_reap callback may already have begun, or when @target has + * already been detached, including forcible detach on reaping. + * + * If @target was stopped before the call, then after a successful call, + * no event callbacks not requested in @events will be made; if + * %UTRACE_EVENT(%QUIESCE) is included in @events, then a + * @report_quiesce callback will be made when @target resumes. + * + * If @target was not stopped and @events excludes some bits that were + * set before, this can return -%EINPROGRESS to indicate that @target + * may have been making some callback to @engine. When this returns + * zero, you can be sure that no event callbacks you've disabled in + * @events can be made. If @events only sets new bits that were not set + * before on @engine, then -%EINPROGRESS will never be returned. + * + * To synchronize after an -%EINPROGRESS return, see utrace_barrier(). + * + * When @target is @current, -%EINPROGRESS is not returned. But note + * that a newly-created engine will not receive any callbacks related to + * an event notification already in progress. This call enables @events + * callbacks to be made as soon as @engine becomes eligible for any + * callbacks, see utrace_attach_task(). + * + * These rules provide for coherent synchronization based on %UTRACE_STOP, + * even when %SIGKILL is breaking its normal simple rules. + */ +int utrace_set_events(struct task_struct *target, + struct utrace_engine *engine, + unsigned long events) +{ + struct utrace *utrace; + unsigned long old_flags, old_utrace_flags; + int ret = -EALREADY; + + /* + * We just ignore the internal bit, so callers can use + * engine->flags to seed bitwise ops for our argument. + */ + events &= ~ENGINE_STOP; + + utrace = get_utrace_lock(target, engine, true); + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(utrace))) + return PTR_ERR(utrace); + + old_utrace_flags = target->utrace_flags; + old_flags = engine->flags & ~ENGINE_STOP; + + /* + * If utrace_report_death() is already progress now, + * it's too late to clear the death event bits. + */ + if (((old_flags & ~events) & _UTRACE_DEATH_EVENTS) && utrace->death) + goto unlock; + + /* + * When setting these flags, it's essential that we really + * synchronize with exit_notify(). They cannot be set after + * exit_notify() takes the tasklist_lock. By holding the read + * lock here while setting the flags, we ensure that the calls + * to tracehook_notify_death() and tracehook_report_death() will + * see the new flags. This ensures that utrace_release_task() + * knows positively that utrace_report_death() will be called or + * that it won't. + */ + if ((events & ~old_flags) & _UTRACE_DEATH_EVENTS) { + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); + if (unlikely(target->exit_state)) { + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + goto unlock; + } + target->utrace_flags |= events; + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + } + + engine->flags = events | (engine->flags & ENGINE_STOP); + target->utrace_flags |= events; + + if ((events & UTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL) && + !(old_utrace_flags & UTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL)) + set_tsk_thread_flag(target, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE); + + ret = 0; + if ((old_flags & ~events) && target != current && + !task_is_stopped_or_traced(target) && !target->exit_state) { + /* + * This barrier ensures that our engine->flags changes + * have hit before we examine utrace->reporting, + * pairing with the barrier in start_callback(). If + * @target has not yet hit finish_callback() to clear + * utrace->reporting, we might be in the middle of a + * callback to @engine. + */ + smp_mb(); + if (utrace->reporting == engine) + ret = -EINPROGRESS; + } +unlock: + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(utrace_set_events); + +/* + * Asynchronously mark an engine as being detached. + * + * This must work while the target thread races with us doing + * start_callback(), defined below. It uses smp_rmb() between checking + * @engine->flags and using @engine->ops. Here we change @engine->ops + * first, then use smp_wmb() before changing @engine->flags. This ensures + * it can check the old flags before using the old ops, or check the old + * flags before using the new ops, or check the new flags before using the + * new ops, but can never check the new flags before using the old ops. + * Hence, utrace_detached_ops might be used with any old flags in place. + * It has report_quiesce() and report_reap() callbacks to handle all cases. + */ +static void mark_engine_detached(struct utrace_engine *engine) +{ + engine->ops = &utrace_detached_ops; + smp_wmb(); + engine->flags = UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE); +} + +/* + * Get @target to stop and return true if it is already stopped now. + * If we return false, it will make some event callback soonish. + * Called with @utrace locked. + */ +static bool utrace_do_stop(struct task_struct *target, struct utrace *utrace) +{ + if (task_is_stopped(target)) { + /* + * Stopped is considered quiescent; when it wakes up, it will + * go through utrace_finish_stop() before doing anything else. + */ + spin_lock_irq(&target->sighand->siglock); + if (likely(task_is_stopped(target))) + __set_task_state(target, TASK_TRACED); + spin_unlock_irq(&target->sighand->siglock); + } else if (utrace->resume > UTRACE_REPORT) { + utrace->resume = UTRACE_REPORT; + set_notify_resume(target); + } + + return task_is_traced(target); +} + +/* + * If the target is not dead it should not be in tracing + * stop any more. Wake it unless it's in job control stop. + */ +static void utrace_wakeup(struct task_struct *target, struct utrace *utrace) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&utrace->lock); + spin_lock_irq(&target->sighand->siglock); + if (target->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED || + target->signal->group_stop_count) + target->state = TASK_STOPPED; + else + wake_up_state(target, __TASK_TRACED); + spin_unlock_irq(&target->sighand->siglock); +} + +/* + * This is called when there might be some detached engines on the list or + * some stale bits in @task->utrace_flags. Clean them up and recompute the + * flags. Returns true if we're now fully detached. + * + * Called with @utrace->lock held, returns with it released. + * After this returns, @utrace might be freed if everything detached. + */ +static bool utrace_reset(struct task_struct *task, struct utrace *utrace) + __releases(utrace->lock) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine, *next; + unsigned long flags = 0; + LIST_HEAD(detached); + + splice_attaching(utrace); + + /* + * Update the set of events of interest from the union + * of the interests of the remaining tracing engines. + * For any engine marked detached, remove it from the list. + * We'll collect them on the detached list. + */ + list_for_each_entry_safe(engine, next, &utrace->attached, entry) { + if (engine->ops == &utrace_detached_ops) { + engine->ops = NULL; + list_move(&engine->entry, &detached); + } else { + flags |= engine->flags | UTRACE_EVENT(REAP); + } + } + + if (task->exit_state) { + /* + * Once it's already dead, we never install any flags + * except REAP. When ->exit_state is set and events + * like DEATH are not set, then they never can be set. + * This ensures that utrace_release_task() knows + * positively that utrace_report_death() can never run. + */ + BUG_ON(utrace->death); + flags &= UTRACE_EVENT(REAP); + } else if (!(flags & UTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL) && + test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) { + clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE); + } + + if (!flags) { + /* + * No more engines, cleared out the utrace. + */ + utrace->resume = UTRACE_RESUME; + utrace->signal_handler = 0; + } + + /* + * If no more engines want it stopped, wake it up. + */ + if (task_is_traced(task) && !(flags & ENGINE_STOP)) { + /* + * It just resumes, so make sure single-step + * is not left set. + */ + if (utrace->resume == UTRACE_RESUME) + user_disable_single_step(task); + utrace_wakeup(task, utrace); + } + + /* + * In theory spin_lock() doesn't imply rcu_read_lock(). + * Once we clear ->utrace_flags this task_struct can go away + * because tracehook_prepare_release_task() path does not take + * utrace->lock when ->utrace_flags == 0. + */ + rcu_read_lock(); + task->utrace_flags = flags; + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + put_detached_list(&detached); + + return !flags; +} + +void utrace_finish_stop(void) +{ + /* + * If we were task_is_traced() and then SIGKILL'ed, make + * sure we do nothing until the tracer drops utrace->lock. + */ + if (unlikely(__fatal_signal_pending(current))) { + struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(current); + spin_unlock_wait(&utrace->lock); + } +} + +/* + * Perform %UTRACE_STOP, i.e. block in TASK_TRACED until woken up. + * @task == current, @utrace == current->utrace, which is not locked. + * Return true if we were woken up by SIGKILL even though some utrace + * engine may still want us to stay stopped. + */ +static void utrace_stop(struct task_struct *task, struct utrace *utrace, + enum utrace_resume_action action) +{ +relock: + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + + if (action < utrace->resume) { + /* + * Ensure a reporting pass when we're resumed. + */ + utrace->resume = action; + if (action == UTRACE_INTERRUPT) + set_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING); + else + set_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME); + } + + /* + * If the ENGINE_STOP bit is clear in utrace_flags, that means + * utrace_reset() ran after we processed some UTRACE_STOP return + * values from callbacks to get here. If all engines have detached + * or resumed us, we don't stop. This check doesn't require + * siglock, but it should follow the interrupt/report bookkeeping + * steps (this can matter for UTRACE_RESUME but not UTRACE_DETACH). + */ + if (unlikely(!(task->utrace_flags & ENGINE_STOP))) { + utrace_reset(task, utrace); + if (task->utrace_flags & ENGINE_STOP) + goto relock; + return; + } + + /* + * The siglock protects us against signals. As well as SIGKILL + * waking us up, we must synchronize with the signal bookkeeping + * for stop signals and SIGCONT. + */ + spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + + if (unlikely(__fatal_signal_pending(task))) { + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + return; + } + + __set_current_state(TASK_TRACED); + + /* + * If there is a group stop in progress, + * we must participate in the bookkeeping. + */ + if (unlikely(task->signal->group_stop_count) && + !--task->signal->group_stop_count) + task->signal->flags = SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED; + + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + + schedule(); + + utrace_finish_stop(); + + /* + * While in TASK_TRACED, we were considered "frozen enough". + * Now that we woke up, it's crucial if we're supposed to be + * frozen that we freeze now before running anything substantial. + */ + try_to_freeze(); + + /* + * While we were in TASK_TRACED, complete_signal() considered + * us "uninterested" in signal wakeups. Now make sure our + * TIF_SIGPENDING state is correct for normal running. + */ + spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + recalc_sigpending(); + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); +} + +/* + * Called by release_task() with @reap set to true. + * Called by utrace_report_death() with @reap set to false. + * On reap, make report_reap callbacks and clean out @utrace + * unless still making callbacks. On death, update bookkeeping + * and handle the reap work if release_task() came in first. + */ +void utrace_maybe_reap(struct task_struct *target, struct utrace *utrace, + bool reap) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine, *next; + struct list_head attached; + + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + + if (reap) { + /* + * If the target will do some final callbacks but hasn't + * finished them yet, we know because it clears these event + * bits after it's done. Instead of cleaning up here and + * requiring utrace_report_death() to cope with it, we + * delay the REAP report and the teardown until after the + * target finishes its death reports. + */ + utrace->reap = 1; + + if (target->utrace_flags & _UTRACE_DEATH_EVENTS) { + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + return; + } + } else { + /* + * After we unlock with this flag clear, any competing + * utrace_control/utrace_set_events calls know that we've + * finished our callbacks and any detach bookkeeping. + */ + utrace->death = 0; + + if (!utrace->reap) { + /* + * We're just dead, not reaped yet. This will + * reset @target->utrace_flags so the later call + * with @reap set won't hit the check above. + */ + utrace_reset(target, utrace); + return; + } + } + + /* + * utrace_add_engine() checks ->utrace_flags != 0. Since + * @utrace->reap is set, nobody can set or clear UTRACE_EVENT(REAP) + * in @engine->flags or change @engine->ops and nobody can change + * @utrace->attached after we drop the lock. + */ + target->utrace_flags = 0; + + /* + * We clear out @utrace->attached before we drop the lock so + * that find_matching_engine() can't come across any old engine + * while we are busy tearing it down. + */ + list_replace_init(&utrace->attached, &attached); + list_splice_tail_init(&utrace->attaching, &attached); + + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + + list_for_each_entry_safe(engine, next, &attached, entry) { + if (engine->flags & UTRACE_EVENT(REAP)) + engine->ops->report_reap(engine, target); + + engine->ops = NULL; + engine->flags = 0; + list_del_init(&engine->entry); + + utrace_engine_put(engine); + } +} + +/* + * You can't do anything to a dead task but detach it. + * If release_task() has been called, you can't do that. + * + * On the exit path, DEATH and QUIESCE event bits are set only + * before utrace_report_death() has taken the lock. At that point, + * the death report will come soon, so disallow detach until it's + * done. This prevents us from racing with it detaching itself. + * + * Called only when @target->exit_state is nonzero. + */ +static inline int utrace_control_dead(struct task_struct *target, + struct utrace *utrace, + enum utrace_resume_action action) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&utrace->lock); + + if (action != UTRACE_DETACH || unlikely(utrace->reap)) + return -ESRCH; + + if (unlikely(utrace->death)) + /* + * We have already started the death report. We can't + * prevent the report_death and report_reap callbacks, + * so tell the caller they will happen. + */ + return -EALREADY; + + return 0; +} + +/** + * utrace_control - control a thread being traced by a tracing engine + * @target: thread to affect + * @engine: attached engine to affect + * @action: &enum utrace_resume_action for thread to do + * + * This is how a tracing engine asks a traced thread to do something. + * This call is controlled by the @action argument, which has the + * same meaning as the &enum utrace_resume_action value returned by + * event reporting callbacks. + * + * If @target is already dead (@target->exit_state nonzero), + * all actions except %UTRACE_DETACH fail with -%ESRCH. + * + * The following sections describe each option for the @action argument. + * + * UTRACE_DETACH: + * + * After this, the @engine data structure is no longer accessible, + * and the thread might be reaped. The thread will start running + * again if it was stopped and no longer has any attached engines + * that want it stopped. + * + * If the @report_reap callback may already have begun, this fails + * with -%ESRCH. If the @report_death callback may already have + * begun, this fails with -%EALREADY. + * + * If @target is not already stopped, then a callback to this engine + * might be in progress or about to start on another CPU. If so, + * then this returns -%EINPROGRESS; the detach happens as soon as + * the pending callback is finished. To synchronize after an + * -%EINPROGRESS return, see utrace_barrier(). + * + * If @target is properly stopped before utrace_control() is called, + * then after successful return it's guaranteed that no more callbacks + * to the @engine->ops vector will be made. + * + * The only exception is %SIGKILL (and exec or group-exit by another + * thread in the group), which can cause asynchronous @report_death + * and/or @report_reap callbacks even when %UTRACE_STOP was used. + * (In that event, this fails with -%ESRCH or -%EALREADY, see above.) + * + * UTRACE_STOP: + * + * This asks that @target stop running. This returns 0 only if + * @target is already stopped, either for tracing or for job + * control. Then @target will remain stopped until another + * utrace_control() call is made on @engine; @target can be woken + * only by %SIGKILL (or equivalent, such as exec or termination by + * another thread in the same thread group). + * + * This returns -%EINPROGRESS if @target is not already stopped. + * Then the effect is like %UTRACE_REPORT. A @report_quiesce or + * @report_signal callback will be made soon. Your callback can + * then return %UTRACE_STOP to keep @target stopped. + * + * This does not interrupt system calls in progress, including ones + * that sleep for a long time. For that, use %UTRACE_INTERRUPT. + * To interrupt system calls and then keep @target stopped, your + * @report_signal callback can return %UTRACE_STOP. + * + * UTRACE_RESUME: + * + * Just let @target continue running normally, reversing the effect + * of a previous %UTRACE_STOP. If another engine is keeping @target + * stopped, then it remains stopped until all engines let it resume. + * If @target was not stopped, this has no effect. + * + * UTRACE_REPORT: + * + * This is like %UTRACE_RESUME, but also ensures that there will be + * a @report_quiesce or @report_signal callback made soon. If + * @target had been stopped, then there will be a callback before it + * resumes running normally. If another engine is keeping @target + * stopped, then there might be no callbacks until all engines let + * it resume. + * + * Since this is meaningless unless @report_quiesce callbacks will + * be made, it returns -%EINVAL if @engine lacks %UTRACE_EVENT(%QUIESCE). + * + * UTRACE_INTERRUPT: + * + * This is like %UTRACE_REPORT, but ensures that @target will make a + * @report_signal callback before it resumes or delivers signals. + * If @target was in a system call or about to enter one, work in + * progress will be interrupted as if by %SIGSTOP. If another + * engine is keeping @target stopped, then there might be no + * callbacks until all engines let it resume. + * + * This gives @engine an opportunity to introduce a forced signal + * disposition via its @report_signal callback. + * + * UTRACE_SINGLESTEP: + * + * It's invalid to use this unless arch_has_single_step() returned true. + * This is like %UTRACE_RESUME, but resumes for one user instruction only. + * + * Note that passing %UTRACE_SINGLESTEP or %UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP to + * utrace_control() or returning it from an event callback alone does + * not necessarily ensure that stepping will be enabled. If there are + * more callbacks made to any engine before returning to user mode, + * then the resume action is chosen only by the last set of callbacks. + * To be sure, enable %UTRACE_EVENT(%QUIESCE) and look for the + * @report_quiesce callback with a zero event mask, or the + * @report_signal callback with %UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT. + * + * Since this is not robust unless @report_quiesce callbacks will + * be made, it returns -%EINVAL if @engine lacks %UTRACE_EVENT(%QUIESCE). + * + * UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP: + * + * It's invalid to use this unless arch_has_block_step() returned true. + * This is like %UTRACE_SINGLESTEP, but resumes for one whole basic + * block of user instructions. + * + * Since this is not robust unless @report_quiesce callbacks will + * be made, it returns -%EINVAL if @engine lacks %UTRACE_EVENT(%QUIESCE). + * + * %UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP devolves to %UTRACE_SINGLESTEP when another + * tracing engine is using %UTRACE_SINGLESTEP at the same time. + */ +int utrace_control(struct task_struct *target, + struct utrace_engine *engine, + enum utrace_resume_action action) +{ + struct utrace *utrace; + bool reset; + int ret; + + if (unlikely(action >= UTRACE_RESUME_MAX)) { + WARN(1, "invalid action argument to utrace_control()!"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* + * This is a sanity check for a programming error in the caller. + * Their request can only work properly in all cases by relying on + * a follow-up callback, but they didn't set one up! This check + * doesn't do locking, but it shouldn't matter. The caller has to + * be synchronously sure the callback is set up to be operating the + * interface properly. + */ + if (action >= UTRACE_REPORT && action < UTRACE_RESUME && + unlikely(!(engine->flags & UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE)))) { + WARN(1, "utrace_control() with no QUIESCE callback in place!"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + utrace = get_utrace_lock(target, engine, true); + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(utrace))) + return PTR_ERR(utrace); + + reset = task_is_traced(target); + ret = 0; + + /* + * ->exit_state can change under us, this doesn't matter. + * We do not care about ->exit_state in fact, but we do + * care about ->reap and ->death. If either flag is set, + * we must also see ->exit_state != 0. + */ + if (unlikely(target->exit_state)) { + ret = utrace_control_dead(target, utrace, action); + if (ret) { + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + return ret; + } + reset = true; + } + + switch (action) { + case UTRACE_STOP: + mark_engine_wants_stop(target, engine); + if (!reset && !utrace_do_stop(target, utrace)) + ret = -EINPROGRESS; + reset = false; + break; + + case UTRACE_DETACH: + if (engine_wants_stop(engine)) + target->utrace_flags &= ~ENGINE_STOP; + mark_engine_detached(engine); + reset = reset || utrace_do_stop(target, utrace); + if (!reset) { + /* + * As in utrace_set_events(), this barrier ensures + * that our engine->flags changes have hit before we + * examine utrace->reporting, pairing with the barrier + * in start_callback(). If @target has not yet hit + * finish_callback() to clear utrace->reporting, we + * might be in the middle of a callback to @engine. + */ + smp_mb(); + if (utrace->reporting == engine) + ret = -EINPROGRESS; + } + break; + + case UTRACE_RESUME: + clear_engine_wants_stop(engine); + break; + + case UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP: + /* + * Resume from stopped, step one block. + * We fall through to treat it like UTRACE_SINGLESTEP. + */ + if (unlikely(!arch_has_block_step())) { + WARN(1, "UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP when !arch_has_block_step()"); + action = UTRACE_SINGLESTEP; + } + + case UTRACE_SINGLESTEP: + /* + * Resume from stopped, step one instruction. + * We fall through to the UTRACE_REPORT case. + */ + if (unlikely(!arch_has_single_step())) { + WARN(1, + "UTRACE_SINGLESTEP when !arch_has_single_step()"); + reset = false; + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; + break; + } + + case UTRACE_REPORT: + /* + * Make the thread call tracehook_notify_resume() soon. + * But don't bother if it's already been interrupted. + * In that case, utrace_get_signal() will be reporting soon. + */ + clear_engine_wants_stop(engine); + if (action < utrace->resume) { + utrace->resume = action; + set_notify_resume(target); + } + break; + + case UTRACE_INTERRUPT: + /* + * Make the thread call tracehook_get_signal() soon. + */ + clear_engine_wants_stop(engine); + if (utrace->resume == UTRACE_INTERRUPT) + break; + utrace->resume = UTRACE_INTERRUPT; + + /* + * If it's not already stopped, interrupt it now. We need + * the siglock here in case it calls recalc_sigpending() + * and clears its own TIF_SIGPENDING. By taking the lock, + * we've serialized any later recalc_sigpending() after our + * setting of utrace->resume to force it on. + */ + if (reset) { + /* + * This is really just to keep the invariant that + * TIF_SIGPENDING is set with UTRACE_INTERRUPT. + * When it's stopped, we know it's always going + * through utrace_get_signal() and will recalculate. + */ + set_tsk_thread_flag(target, TIF_SIGPENDING); + } else { + struct sighand_struct *sighand; + unsigned long irqflags; + sighand = lock_task_sighand(target, &irqflags); + if (likely(sighand)) { + signal_wake_up(target, 0); + unlock_task_sighand(target, &irqflags); + } + } + break; + + default: + BUG(); /* We checked it on entry. */ + } + + /* + * Let the thread resume running. If it's not stopped now, + * there is nothing more we need to do. + */ + if (reset) + utrace_reset(target, utrace); + else + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(utrace_control); + +/** + * utrace_barrier - synchronize with simultaneous tracing callbacks + * @target: thread to affect + * @engine: engine to affect (can be detached) + * + * This blocks while @target might be in the midst of making a callback to + * @engine. It can be interrupted by signals and will return -%ERESTARTSYS. + * A return value of zero means no callback from @target to @engine was + * in progress. Any effect of its return value (such as %UTRACE_STOP) has + * already been applied to @engine. + * + * It's not necessary to keep the @target pointer alive for this call. + * It's only necessary to hold a ref on @engine. This will return + * safely even if @target has been reaped and has no task refs. + * + * A successful return from utrace_barrier() guarantees its ordering + * with respect to utrace_set_events() and utrace_control() calls. If + * @target was not properly stopped, event callbacks just disabled might + * still be in progress; utrace_barrier() waits until there is no chance + * an unwanted callback can be in progress. + */ +int utrace_barrier(struct task_struct *target, struct utrace_engine *engine) +{ + struct utrace *utrace; + int ret = -ERESTARTSYS; + + if (unlikely(target == current)) + return 0; + + do { + utrace = get_utrace_lock(target, engine, false); + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(utrace))) { + ret = PTR_ERR(utrace); + if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS) + break; + } else { + /* + * All engine state changes are done while + * holding the lock, i.e. before we get here. + * Since we have the lock, we only need to + * worry about @target making a callback. + * When it has entered start_callback() but + * not yet gotten to finish_callback(), we + * will see utrace->reporting == @engine. + * When @target doesn't take the lock, it uses + * barriers to order setting utrace->reporting + * before it examines the engine state. + */ + if (utrace->reporting != engine) + ret = 0; + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + if (!ret) + break; + } + schedule_timeout_interruptible(1); + } while (!signal_pending(current)); + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(utrace_barrier); + +/* + * This is local state used for reporting loops, perhaps optimized away. + */ +struct utrace_report { + u32 result; + enum utrace_resume_action action; + enum utrace_resume_action resume_action; + bool detaches; + bool spurious; +}; + +#define INIT_REPORT(var) \ + struct utrace_report var = { \ + .action = UTRACE_RESUME, \ + .resume_action = UTRACE_RESUME, \ + .spurious = true \ + } + +/* + * We are now making the report, so clear the flag saying we need one. + * When there is a new attach, ->pending_attach is set just so we will + * know to do splice_attaching() here before the callback loop. + */ +static enum utrace_resume_action start_report(struct utrace *utrace) +{ + enum utrace_resume_action resume = utrace->resume; + if (utrace->pending_attach || + (resume > UTRACE_INTERRUPT && resume < UTRACE_RESUME)) { + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + splice_attaching(utrace); + resume = utrace->resume; + if (resume > UTRACE_INTERRUPT) + utrace->resume = UTRACE_RESUME; + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + } + return resume; +} + +static inline void finish_report_reset(struct task_struct *task, + struct utrace *utrace, + struct utrace_report *report) +{ + if (unlikely(report->spurious || report->detaches)) { + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + if (utrace_reset(task, utrace)) + report->action = UTRACE_RESUME; + } +} + +/* + * Complete a normal reporting pass, pairing with a start_report() call. + * This handles any UTRACE_DETACH or UTRACE_REPORT or UTRACE_INTERRUPT + * returns from engine callbacks. If @will_not_stop is true and any + * engine's last callback used UTRACE_STOP, we do UTRACE_REPORT here to + * ensure we stop before user mode. If there were no callbacks made, it + * will recompute @task->utrace_flags to avoid another false-positive. + */ +static void finish_report(struct task_struct *task, struct utrace *utrace, + struct utrace_report *report, bool will_not_stop) +{ + enum utrace_resume_action resume = report->action; + + if (resume == UTRACE_STOP) + resume = will_not_stop ? UTRACE_REPORT : UTRACE_RESUME; + + if (resume < utrace->resume) { + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + utrace->resume = resume; + if (resume == UTRACE_INTERRUPT) + set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SIGPENDING); + else + set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME); + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + } + + finish_report_reset(task, utrace, report); +} + +static void finish_callback_report(struct task_struct *task, + struct utrace *utrace, + struct utrace_report *report, + struct utrace_engine *engine, + enum utrace_resume_action action) +{ + if (action == UTRACE_DETACH) { + /* + * By holding the lock here, we make sure that + * utrace_barrier() (really get_utrace_lock()) sees the + * effect of this detach. Otherwise utrace_barrier() could + * return 0 after this callback had returned UTRACE_DETACH. + * This way, a 0 return is an unambiguous indicator that any + * callback returning UTRACE_DETACH has indeed caused detach. + */ + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + engine->ops = &utrace_detached_ops; + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + } + + /* + * If utrace_control() was used, treat that like UTRACE_DETACH here. + */ + if (engine->ops == &utrace_detached_ops) { + report->detaches = true; + return; + } + + if (action < report->action) + report->action = action; + + if (action != UTRACE_STOP) { + if (action < report->resume_action) + report->resume_action = action; + + if (engine_wants_stop(engine)) { + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + clear_engine_wants_stop(engine); + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + } + + return; + } + + if (!engine_wants_stop(engine)) { + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + /* + * If utrace_control() came in and detached us + * before we got the lock, we must not stop now. + */ + if (unlikely(engine->ops == &utrace_detached_ops)) + report->detaches = true; + else + mark_engine_wants_stop(task, engine); + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + } +} + +/* + * Apply the return value of one engine callback to @report. + * Returns true if @engine detached and should not get any more callbacks. + */ +static bool finish_callback(struct task_struct *task, struct utrace *utrace, + struct utrace_report *report, + struct utrace_engine *engine, + u32 ret) +{ + report->result = ret & ~UTRACE_RESUME_MASK; + finish_callback_report(task, utrace, report, engine, + utrace_resume_action(ret)); + + /* + * Now that we have applied the effect of the return value, + * clear this so that utrace_barrier() can stop waiting. + * A subsequent utrace_control() can stop or resume @engine + * and know this was ordered after its callback's action. + * + * We don't need any barriers here because utrace_barrier() + * takes utrace->lock. If we touched engine->flags above, + * the lock guaranteed this change was before utrace_barrier() + * examined utrace->reporting. + */ + utrace->reporting = NULL; + + /* + * We've just done an engine callback. These are allowed to sleep, + * though all well-behaved ones restrict that to blocking kalloc() + * or quickly-acquired mutex_lock() and the like. This is a good + * place to make sure tracing engines don't introduce too much + * latency under voluntary preemption. + */ + might_sleep(); + + return engine->ops == &utrace_detached_ops; +} + +/* + * Start the callbacks for @engine to consider @event (a bit mask). + * This makes the report_quiesce() callback first. If @engine wants + * a specific callback for @event, we return the ops vector to use. + * If not, we return NULL. The return value from the ops->callback + * function called should be passed to finish_callback(). + */ +static const struct utrace_engine_ops *start_callback( + struct utrace *utrace, struct utrace_report *report, + struct utrace_engine *engine, struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long event) +{ + const struct utrace_engine_ops *ops; + unsigned long want; + + /* + * This barrier ensures that we've set utrace->reporting before + * we examine engine->flags or engine->ops. utrace_barrier() + * relies on this ordering to indicate that the effect of any + * utrace_control() and utrace_set_events() calls is in place + * by the time utrace->reporting can be seen to be NULL. + */ + utrace->reporting = engine; + smp_mb(); + + /* + * This pairs with the barrier in mark_engine_detached(). + * It makes sure that we never see the old ops vector with + * the new flags, in case the original vector had no report_quiesce. + */ + want = engine->flags; + smp_rmb(); + ops = engine->ops; + + if ((want & UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE)) || ops == &utrace_detached_ops) { + if (finish_callback(task, utrace, report, engine, + (*ops->report_quiesce)(report->action, + engine, event))) + return NULL; + + if (!event) { + /* We only got here to report QUIESCE */ + report->spurious = false; + return NULL; + } + + /* + * finish_callback() reset utrace->reporting after the + * quiesce callback. Now we set it again (as above) + * before re-examining engine->flags, which could have + * been changed synchronously by ->report_quiesce or + * asynchronously by utrace_control() or utrace_set_events(). + */ + utrace->reporting = engine; + smp_mb(); + want = engine->flags; + } + + if (want & ENGINE_STOP) + report->action = UTRACE_STOP; + + if (want & event) { + report->spurious = false; + return ops; + } + + utrace->reporting = NULL; + return NULL; +} + +/* + * Do a normal reporting pass for engines interested in @event. + * @callback is the name of the member in the ops vector, and remaining + * args are the extras it takes after the standard three args. + */ +#define REPORT_CALLBACKS(rev, task, utrace, report, event, callback, ...) \ + do { \ + struct utrace_engine *engine; \ + const struct utrace_engine_ops *ops; \ + list_for_each_entry##rev(engine, &utrace->attached, entry) { \ + ops = start_callback(utrace, report, engine, task, \ + event); \ + if (!ops) \ + continue; \ + finish_callback(task, utrace, report, engine, \ + (*ops->callback)(__VA_ARGS__)); \ + } \ + } while (0) +#define REPORT(task, utrace, report, event, callback, ...) \ + do { \ + start_report(utrace); \ + REPORT_CALLBACKS(, task, utrace, report, event, callback, \ + (report)->action, engine, ## __VA_ARGS__); \ + finish_report(task, utrace, report, true); \ + } while (0) + +/* + * Called iff UTRACE_EVENT(EXEC) flag is set. + */ +void utrace_report_exec(struct linux_binfmt *fmt, struct linux_binprm *bprm, + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + struct task_struct *task = current; + struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(task); + INIT_REPORT(report); + + REPORT(task, utrace, &report, UTRACE_EVENT(EXEC), + report_exec, fmt, bprm, regs); +} + +static u32 do_report_syscall_entry(struct pt_regs *regs, + struct task_struct *task, + struct utrace *utrace, + struct utrace_report *report, + u32 resume_report) +{ + start_report(utrace); + REPORT_CALLBACKS(_reverse, task, utrace, report, + UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_ENTRY), report_syscall_entry, + resume_report | report->result | report->action, + engine, regs); + finish_report(task, utrace, report, false); + + if (report->action != UTRACE_STOP) + return 0; + + utrace_stop(task, utrace, report->resume_action); + + if (fatal_signal_pending(task)) { + /* + * We are continuing despite UTRACE_STOP because of a + * SIGKILL. Don't let the system call actually proceed. + */ + report->result = UTRACE_SYSCALL_ABORT; + } else if (utrace->resume <= UTRACE_REPORT) { + /* + * If we've been asked for another report after our stop, + * go back to report (and maybe stop) again before we run + * the system call. The second (and later) reports are + * marked with the UTRACE_SYSCALL_RESUMED flag so that + * engines know this is a second report at the same + * entry. This gives them the chance to examine the + * registers anew after they might have been changed + * while we were stopped. + */ + report->detaches = false; + report->spurious = true; + report->action = report->resume_action = UTRACE_RESUME; + return UTRACE_SYSCALL_RESUMED; + } + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Called iff UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_ENTRY) flag is set. + * Return true to prevent the system call. + */ +bool utrace_report_syscall_entry(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + struct task_struct *task = current; + struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(task); + INIT_REPORT(report); + u32 resume_report = 0; + + do { + resume_report = do_report_syscall_entry(regs, task, utrace, + &report, resume_report); + } while (resume_report); + + return utrace_syscall_action(report.result) == UTRACE_SYSCALL_ABORT; +} + +/* + * Called iff UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_EXIT) flag is set. + */ +void utrace_report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + struct task_struct *task = current; + struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(task); + INIT_REPORT(report); + + REPORT(task, utrace, &report, UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_EXIT), + report_syscall_exit, regs); +} + +/* + * Called iff UTRACE_EVENT(CLONE) flag is set. + * This notification call blocks the wake_up_new_task call on the child. + * So we must not quiesce here. tracehook_report_clone_complete will do + * a quiescence check momentarily. + */ +void utrace_report_clone(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *child) +{ + struct task_struct *task = current; + struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(task); + INIT_REPORT(report); + + /* + * We don't use the REPORT() macro here, because we need + * to clear utrace->cloning before finish_report(). + * After finish_report(), utrace can be a stale pointer + * in cases when report.action is still UTRACE_RESUME. + */ + start_report(utrace); + utrace->cloning = child; + + REPORT_CALLBACKS(, task, utrace, &report, + UTRACE_EVENT(CLONE), report_clone, + report.action, engine, clone_flags, child); + + utrace->cloning = NULL; + finish_report(task, utrace, &report, !(clone_flags & CLONE_VFORK)); + + /* + * For a vfork, we will go into an uninterruptible block waiting + * for the child. We need UTRACE_STOP to happen before this, not + * after. For CLONE_VFORK, utrace_finish_vfork() will be called. + */ + if (report.action == UTRACE_STOP && (clone_flags & CLONE_VFORK)) { + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + utrace->vfork_stop = 1; + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + } +} + +/* + * We're called after utrace_report_clone() for a CLONE_VFORK. + * If UTRACE_STOP was left from the clone report, we stop here. + * After this, we'll enter the uninterruptible wait_for_completion() + * waiting for the child. + */ +void utrace_finish_vfork(struct task_struct *task) +{ + struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(task); + + if (utrace->vfork_stop) { + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + utrace->vfork_stop = 0; + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + utrace_stop(task, utrace, UTRACE_RESUME); /* XXX */ + } +} + +/* + * Called iff UTRACE_EVENT(JCTL) flag is set. + * + * Called with siglock held. + */ +void utrace_report_jctl(int notify, int what) +{ + struct task_struct *task = current; + struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(task); + INIT_REPORT(report); + + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + + REPORT(task, utrace, &report, UTRACE_EVENT(JCTL), + report_jctl, what, notify); + + spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); +} + +/* + * Called iff UTRACE_EVENT(EXIT) flag is set. + */ +void utrace_report_exit(long *exit_code) +{ + struct task_struct *task = current; + struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(task); + INIT_REPORT(report); + long orig_code = *exit_code; + + REPORT(task, utrace, &report, UTRACE_EVENT(EXIT), + report_exit, orig_code, exit_code); + + if (report.action == UTRACE_STOP) + utrace_stop(task, utrace, report.resume_action); +} + +/* + * Called iff UTRACE_EVENT(DEATH) or UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE) flag is set. + * + * It is always possible that we are racing with utrace_release_task here. + * For this reason, utrace_release_task checks for the event bits that get + * us here, and delays its cleanup for us to do. + */ +void utrace_report_death(struct task_struct *task, struct utrace *utrace, + bool group_dead, int signal) +{ + INIT_REPORT(report); + + BUG_ON(!task->exit_state); + + /* + * We are presently considered "quiescent"--which is accurate + * inasmuch as we won't run any more user instructions ever again. + * But for utrace_control and utrace_set_events to be robust, they + * must be sure whether or not we will run any more callbacks. If + * a call comes in before we do, taking the lock here synchronizes + * us so we don't run any callbacks just disabled. Calls that come + * in while we're running the callbacks will see the exit.death + * flag and know that we are not yet fully quiescent for purposes + * of detach bookkeeping. + */ + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + BUG_ON(utrace->death); + utrace->death = 1; + utrace->resume = UTRACE_RESUME; + splice_attaching(utrace); + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + + REPORT_CALLBACKS(, task, utrace, &report, UTRACE_EVENT(DEATH), + report_death, engine, group_dead, signal); + + utrace_maybe_reap(task, utrace, false); +} + +/* + * Finish the last reporting pass before returning to user mode. + */ +static void finish_resume_report(struct task_struct *task, + struct utrace *utrace, + struct utrace_report *report) +{ + finish_report_reset(task, utrace, report); + + switch (report->action) { + case UTRACE_STOP: + utrace_stop(task, utrace, report->resume_action); + break; + + case UTRACE_INTERRUPT: + if (!signal_pending(task)) + set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SIGPENDING); + break; + + case UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP: + if (likely(arch_has_block_step())) { + user_enable_block_step(task); + break; + } + + /* + * This means some callback is to blame for failing + * to check arch_has_block_step() itself. Warn and + * then fall through to treat it as SINGLESTEP. + */ + WARN(1, "UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP when !arch_has_block_step()"); + + case UTRACE_SINGLESTEP: + if (likely(arch_has_single_step())) { + user_enable_single_step(task); + } else { + /* + * This means some callback is to blame for failing + * to check arch_has_single_step() itself. Spew + * about it so the loser will fix his module. + */ + WARN(1, + "UTRACE_SINGLESTEP when !arch_has_single_step()"); + } + break; + + case UTRACE_REPORT: + case UTRACE_RESUME: + default: + user_disable_single_step(task); + break; + } +} + +/* + * This is called when TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME had been set (and is now clear). + * We are close to user mode, and this is the place to report or stop. + * When we return, we're going to user mode or into the signals code. + */ +void utrace_resume(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(task); + INIT_REPORT(report); + struct utrace_engine *engine; + + /* + * Some machines get here with interrupts disabled. The same arch + * code path leads to calling into get_signal_to_deliver(), which + * implicitly reenables them by virtue of spin_unlock_irq. + */ + local_irq_enable(); + + /* + * If this flag is still set it's because there was a signal + * handler setup done but no report_signal following it. Clear + * the flag before we get to user so it doesn't confuse us later. + */ + if (unlikely(utrace->signal_handler)) { + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + utrace->signal_handler = 0; + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + } + + /* + * Update our bookkeeping even if there are no callbacks made here. + */ + report.action = start_report(utrace); + + switch (report.action) { + case UTRACE_RESUME: + /* + * Anything we might have done was already handled by + * utrace_get_signal(), or this is an entirely spurious + * call. (The arch might use TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME for other + * purposes as well as calling us.) + */ + return; + case UTRACE_REPORT: + if (unlikely(!(task->utrace_flags & UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE)))) + break; + /* + * Do a simple reporting pass, with no specific + * callback after report_quiesce. + */ + report.action = UTRACE_RESUME; + list_for_each_entry(engine, &utrace->attached, entry) + start_callback(utrace, &report, engine, task, 0); + break; + default: + /* + * Even if this report was truly spurious, there is no need + * for utrace_reset() now. TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME was already + * cleared--it doesn't stay spuriously set. + */ + report.spurious = false; + break; + } + + /* + * Finish the report and either stop or get ready to resume. + * If utrace->resume was not UTRACE_REPORT, this applies its + * effect now (i.e. step or interrupt). + */ + finish_resume_report(task, utrace, &report); +} + +/* + * Return true if current has forced signal_pending(). + * + * This is called only when current->utrace_flags is nonzero, so we know + * that current->utrace must be set. It's not inlined in tracehook.h + * just so that struct utrace can stay opaque outside this file. + */ +bool utrace_interrupt_pending(void) +{ + return task_utrace_struct(current)->resume == UTRACE_INTERRUPT; +} + +/* + * Take the siglock and push @info back on our queue. + * Returns with @task->sighand->siglock held. + */ +static void push_back_signal(struct task_struct *task, siginfo_t *info) + __acquires(task->sighand->siglock) +{ + struct sigqueue *q; + + if (unlikely(!info->si_signo)) { /* Oh, a wise guy! */ + spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + return; + } + + q = sigqueue_alloc(); + if (likely(q)) { + q->flags = 0; + copy_siginfo(&q->info, info); + } + + spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + + sigaddset(&task->pending.signal, info->si_signo); + if (likely(q)) + list_add(&q->list, &task->pending.list); + + set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SIGPENDING); +} + +/* + * This is the hook from the signals code, called with the siglock held. + * Here is the ideal place to stop. We also dequeue and intercept signals. + */ +int utrace_get_signal(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, + siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *return_ka) + __releases(task->sighand->siglock) + __acquires(task->sighand->siglock) +{ + struct utrace *utrace; + struct k_sigaction *ka; + INIT_REPORT(report); + struct utrace_engine *engine; + const struct utrace_engine_ops *ops; + unsigned long event, want; + u32 ret; + int signr; + + utrace = task_utrace_struct(task); + if (utrace->resume < UTRACE_RESUME || + utrace->pending_attach || utrace->signal_handler) { + enum utrace_resume_action resume; + + /* + * We've been asked for an explicit report before we + * even check for pending signals. + */ + + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + + splice_attaching(utrace); + + report.result = utrace->signal_handler ? + UTRACE_SIGNAL_HANDLER : UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT; + utrace->signal_handler = 0; + + resume = utrace->resume; + utrace->resume = UTRACE_RESUME; + + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + + /* + * Make sure signal_pending() only returns true + * if there are real signals pending. + */ + if (signal_pending(task)) { + spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + recalc_sigpending(); + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + } + + if (resume > UTRACE_REPORT) { + /* + * We only got here to process utrace->resume. + * Despite no callbacks, this report is not spurious. + */ + report.action = resume; + report.spurious = false; + finish_resume_report(task, utrace, &report); + return -1; + } else if (!(task->utrace_flags & UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE))) { + /* + * We only got here to clear utrace->signal_handler. + */ + return -1; + } + + /* + * Do a reporting pass for no signal, just for EVENT(QUIESCE). + * The engine callbacks can fill in *info and *return_ka. + * We'll pass NULL for the @orig_ka argument to indicate + * that there was no original signal. + */ + event = 0; + ka = NULL; + memset(return_ka, 0, sizeof *return_ka); + } else if (!(task->utrace_flags & UTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL_ALL) || + unlikely(task->signal->group_stop_count)) { + /* + * If no engine is interested in intercepting signals or + * we must stop, let the caller just dequeue them normally + * or participate in group-stop. + */ + return 0; + } else { + /* + * Steal the next signal so we can let tracing engines + * examine it. From the signal number and sigaction, + * determine what normal delivery would do. If no + * engine perturbs it, we'll do that by returning the + * signal number after setting *return_ka. + */ + signr = dequeue_signal(task, &task->blocked, info); + if (signr == 0) + return signr; + BUG_ON(signr != info->si_signo); + + ka = &task->sighand->action[signr - 1]; + *return_ka = *ka; + + /* + * We are never allowed to interfere with SIGKILL. + * Just punt after filling in *return_ka for our caller. + */ + if (signr == SIGKILL) + return signr; + + if (ka->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN) { + event = UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_IGN); + report.result = UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN; + } else if (ka->sa.sa_handler != SIG_DFL) { + event = UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL); + report.result = UTRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVER; + } else if (sig_kernel_coredump(signr)) { + event = UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_CORE); + report.result = UTRACE_SIGNAL_CORE; + } else if (sig_kernel_ignore(signr)) { + event = UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_IGN); + report.result = UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN; + } else if (signr == SIGSTOP) { + event = UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_STOP); + report.result = UTRACE_SIGNAL_STOP; + } else if (sig_kernel_stop(signr)) { + event = UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_STOP); + report.result = UTRACE_SIGNAL_TSTP; + } else { + event = UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_TERM); + report.result = UTRACE_SIGNAL_TERM; + } + + /* + * Now that we know what event type this signal is, we + * can short-circuit if no engines care about those. + */ + if ((task->utrace_flags & (event | UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE))) == 0) + return signr; + + /* + * We have some interested engines, so tell them about + * the signal and let them change its disposition. + */ + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + } + + /* + * This reporting pass chooses what signal disposition we'll act on. + */ + list_for_each_entry(engine, &utrace->attached, entry) { + /* + * See start_callback() comment about this barrier. + */ + utrace->reporting = engine; + smp_mb(); + + /* + * This pairs with the barrier in mark_engine_detached(), + * see start_callback() comments. + */ + want = engine->flags; + smp_rmb(); + ops = engine->ops; + + if ((want & (event | UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE))) == 0) { + utrace->reporting = NULL; + continue; + } + + if (ops->report_signal) + ret = (*ops->report_signal)( + report.result | report.action, engine, + regs, info, ka, return_ka); + else + ret = (report.result | (*ops->report_quiesce)( + report.action, engine, event)); + + /* + * Avoid a tight loop reporting again and again if some + * engine is too stupid. + */ + switch (utrace_resume_action(ret)) { + default: + break; + case UTRACE_INTERRUPT: + case UTRACE_REPORT: + ret = (ret & ~UTRACE_RESUME_MASK) | UTRACE_RESUME; + break; + } + + finish_callback(task, utrace, &report, engine, ret); + } + + /* + * We express the chosen action to the signals code in terms + * of a representative signal whose default action does it. + * Our caller uses our return value (signr) to decide what to + * do, but uses info->si_signo as the signal number to report. + */ + switch (utrace_signal_action(report.result)) { + case UTRACE_SIGNAL_TERM: + signr = SIGTERM; + break; + + case UTRACE_SIGNAL_CORE: + signr = SIGQUIT; + break; + + case UTRACE_SIGNAL_STOP: + signr = SIGSTOP; + break; + + case UTRACE_SIGNAL_TSTP: + signr = SIGTSTP; + break; + + case UTRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVER: + signr = info->si_signo; + + if (return_ka->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL) { + /* + * We'll do signr's normal default action. + * For ignore, we'll fall through below. + * For stop/death, break locks and returns it. + */ + if (likely(signr) && !sig_kernel_ignore(signr)) + break; + } else if (return_ka->sa.sa_handler != SIG_IGN && + likely(signr)) { + /* + * Complete the bookkeeping after the report. + * The handler will run. If an engine wanted to + * stop or step, then make sure we do another + * report after signal handler setup. + */ + if (report.action != UTRACE_RESUME) + report.action = UTRACE_INTERRUPT; + finish_report(task, utrace, &report, true); + + if (unlikely(report.result & UTRACE_SIGNAL_HOLD)) + push_back_signal(task, info); + else + spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + + /* + * We do the SA_ONESHOT work here since the + * normal path will only touch *return_ka now. + */ + if (unlikely(return_ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONESHOT)) { + return_ka->sa.sa_flags &= ~SA_ONESHOT; + if (likely(valid_signal(signr))) { + ka = &task->sighand->action[signr - 1]; + ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL; + } + } + + return signr; + } + + /* Fall through for an ignored signal. */ + + case UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN: + case UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT: + default: + /* + * If the signal is being ignored, then we are on the way + * directly back to user mode. We can stop here, or step, + * as in utrace_resume(), above. After we've dealt with that, + * our caller will relock and come back through here. + */ + finish_resume_report(task, utrace, &report); + + if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(task))) { + /* + * The only reason we woke up now was because of a + * SIGKILL. Don't do normal dequeuing in case it + * might get a signal other than SIGKILL. That would + * perturb the death state so it might differ from + * what the debugger would have allowed to happen. + * Instead, pluck out just the SIGKILL to be sure + * we'll die immediately with nothing else different + * from the quiescent state the debugger wanted us in. + */ + sigset_t sigkill_only; + siginitsetinv(&sigkill_only, sigmask(SIGKILL)); + spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + signr = dequeue_signal(task, &sigkill_only, info); + BUG_ON(signr != SIGKILL); + *return_ka = task->sighand->action[SIGKILL - 1]; + return signr; + } + + if (unlikely(report.result & UTRACE_SIGNAL_HOLD)) { + push_back_signal(task, info); + spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + } + + return -1; + } + + /* + * Complete the bookkeeping after the report. + * This sets utrace->resume if UTRACE_STOP was used. + */ + finish_report(task, utrace, &report, true); + + return_ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL; + + /* + * If this signal is fatal, si_signo gets through as exit_code. + * We can't allow a completely bogus value there or else core + * kernel code can freak out. (If an engine wants to control + * the exit_code value exactly, it can do so in report_exit.) + * We'll produce a big complaint in dmesg, but won't crash. + * That's nicer for debugging your utrace engine. + */ + if (unlikely(info->si_signo & 0x80)) { + WARN(1, "utrace engine left bogus si_signo value!"); + info->si_signo = SIGTRAP; + } + + if (unlikely(report.result & UTRACE_SIGNAL_HOLD)) + push_back_signal(task, info); + else + spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); + + if (sig_kernel_stop(signr)) + task->signal->flags |= SIGNAL_STOP_DEQUEUED; + + return signr; +} + +/* + * This gets called after a signal handler has been set up. + * We set a flag so the next report knows it happened. + * If we're already stepping, make sure we do a report_signal. + * If not, make sure we get into utrace_resume() where we can + * clear the signal_handler flag before resuming. + */ +void utrace_signal_handler(struct task_struct *task, int stepping) +{ + struct utrace *utrace = task_utrace_struct(task); + + spin_lock(&utrace->lock); + + utrace->signal_handler = 1; + if (utrace->resume > UTRACE_INTERRUPT) { + if (stepping) { + utrace->resume = UTRACE_INTERRUPT; + set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SIGPENDING); + } else if (utrace->resume == UTRACE_RESUME) { + set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME); + } + } + + spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); +} + +/** + * utrace_prepare_examine - prepare to examine thread state + * @target: thread of interest, a &struct task_struct pointer + * @engine: engine pointer returned by utrace_attach_task() + * @exam: temporary state, a &struct utrace_examiner pointer + * + * This call prepares to safely examine the thread @target using + * &struct user_regset calls, or direct access to thread-synchronous fields. + * + * When @target is current, this call is superfluous. When @target is + * another thread, it must be held stopped via %UTRACE_STOP by @engine. + * + * This call may block the caller until @target stays stopped, so it must + * be called only after the caller is sure @target is about to unschedule. + * This means a zero return from a utrace_control() call on @engine giving + * %UTRACE_STOP, or a report_quiesce() or report_signal() callback to + * @engine that used %UTRACE_STOP in its return value. + * + * Returns -%ESRCH if @target is dead or -%EINVAL if %UTRACE_STOP was + * not used. If @target has started running again despite %UTRACE_STOP + * (for %SIGKILL or a spurious wakeup), this call returns -%EAGAIN. + * + * When this call returns zero, it's safe to use &struct user_regset + * calls and task_user_regset_view() on @target and to examine some of + * its fields directly. When the examination is complete, a + * utrace_finish_examine() call must follow to check whether it was + * completed safely. + */ +int utrace_prepare_examine(struct task_struct *target, + struct utrace_engine *engine, + struct utrace_examiner *exam) +{ + int ret = 0; + + if (unlikely(target == current)) + return 0; + + rcu_read_lock(); + if (unlikely(!engine_wants_stop(engine))) + ret = -EINVAL; + else if (unlikely(target->exit_state)) + ret = -ESRCH; + else { + exam->state = target->state; + if (unlikely(exam->state == TASK_RUNNING)) + ret = -EAGAIN; + else + get_task_struct(target); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + + if (likely(!ret)) { + exam->ncsw = wait_task_inactive(target, exam->state); + put_task_struct(target); + if (unlikely(!exam->ncsw)) + ret = -EAGAIN; + } + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(utrace_prepare_examine); + +/** + * utrace_finish_examine - complete an examination of thread state + * @target: thread of interest, a &struct task_struct pointer + * @engine: engine pointer returned by utrace_attach_task() + * @exam: pointer passed to utrace_prepare_examine() call + * + * This call completes an examination on the thread @target begun by a + * paired utrace_prepare_examine() call with the same arguments that + * returned success (zero). + * + * When @target is current, this call is superfluous. When @target is + * another thread, this returns zero if @target has remained unscheduled + * since the paired utrace_prepare_examine() call returned zero. + * + * When this returns an error, any examination done since the paired + * utrace_prepare_examine() call is unreliable and the data extracted + * should be discarded. The error is -%EINVAL if @engine is not + * keeping @target stopped, or -%EAGAIN if @target woke up unexpectedly. + */ +int utrace_finish_examine(struct task_struct *target, + struct utrace_engine *engine, + struct utrace_examiner *exam) +{ + int ret = 0; + + if (unlikely(target == current)) + return 0; + + rcu_read_lock(); + if (unlikely(!engine_wants_stop(engine))) + ret = -EINVAL; + else if (unlikely(target->state != exam->state)) + ret = -EAGAIN; + else + get_task_struct(target); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + if (likely(!ret)) { + unsigned long ncsw = wait_task_inactive(target, exam->state); + if (unlikely(ncsw != exam->ncsw)) + ret = -EAGAIN; + put_task_struct(target); + } + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(utrace_finish_examine); + +/* + * This is declared in linux/regset.h and defined in machine-dependent + * code. We put the export here to ensure no machine forgets it. + */ +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(task_user_regset_view); + +/* + * Called with rcu_read_lock() held. + */ +void task_utrace_proc_status(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *p) +{ + seq_printf(m, "Utrace:\t%lx\n", p->utrace_flags); +} -- 1.5.5.1 From oleg at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 16:08:38 2011 From: oleg at redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:08:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] implement utrace-ptrace In-Reply-To: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110620160838.GE5994@redhat.com> The patch adds the new file, kernel/ptrace-utrace.c, which contains the new implementation of ptrace over utrace. It's supposed to be an invisible implementation change, nothing should change to userland when CONFIG_UTRACE is enabled. Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov --- include/linux/ptrace.h | 3 + kernel/Makefile | 1 + kernel/ptrace-utrace.c | 1173 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/ptrace.c | 638 +++++++++++++------------- kernel/utrace.c | 16 + 5 files changed, 1513 insertions(+), 318 deletions(-) create mode 100644 kernel/ptrace-utrace.c diff --git a/include/linux/ptrace.h b/include/linux/ptrace.h index 446ed8f..5b0562e 100644 --- a/include/linux/ptrace.h +++ b/include/linux/ptrace.h @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ extern bool __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *tracer, struct task_struct *tracee); +extern int ptrace_traceme(void); +extern int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *tsk); +extern void ptrace_notify_stop(struct task_struct *tracee); extern long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, unsigned long addr, unsigned long data); diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile index 4a22e81..5c280dc 100644 --- a/kernel/Makefile +++ b/kernel/Makefile @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS) += res_counter.o obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += stop_machine.o obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o obj-$(CONFIG_UTRACE) += utrace.o +obj-$(CONFIG_UTRACE) += ptrace-utrace.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT) += audit.o auditfilter.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL) += auditsc.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o diff --git a/kernel/ptrace-utrace.c b/kernel/ptrace-utrace.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7a9b396 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/ptrace-utrace.c @@ -0,0 +1,1173 @@ +/* + * linux/kernel/ptrace.c + * + * (C) Copyright 1999 Linus Torvalds + * + * Common interfaces for "ptrace()" which we do not want + * to continually duplicate across every architecture. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/* + * unptrace a task: move it back to its original parent and + * remove it from the ptrace list. + * + * Must be called with the tasklist lock write-held. + */ +void __ptrace_unlink(struct task_struct *child) +{ + BUG_ON(!child->ptrace); + + child->ptrace = 0; + child->parent = child->real_parent; + list_del_init(&child->ptrace_entry); +} + +struct ptrace_context { + int options; + + int signr; + siginfo_t *siginfo; + + int stop_code; + unsigned long eventmsg; + + enum utrace_resume_action resume; +}; + +#define PT_UTRACED 0x00001000 + +#define PTRACE_O_SYSEMU 0x100 +#define PTRACE_O_DETACHED 0x200 + +#define PTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL (1 << 16) +#define PTRACE_EVENT_SIGTRAP (2 << 16) +#define PTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL (3 << 16) +/* events visible to user-space */ +#define PTRACE_EVENT_MASK 0xFFFF + +static inline bool ptrace_event_pending(struct ptrace_context *ctx) +{ + return ctx->stop_code != 0; +} + +static inline int get_stop_event(struct ptrace_context *ctx) +{ + return ctx->stop_code >> 8; +} + +static inline void set_stop_code(struct ptrace_context *ctx, int event) +{ + ctx->stop_code = (event << 8) | SIGTRAP; +} + +static inline struct ptrace_context * +ptrace_context(struct utrace_engine *engine) +{ + return engine->data; +} + +static const struct utrace_engine_ops ptrace_utrace_ops; /* forward decl */ + +static struct utrace_engine *ptrace_lookup_engine(struct task_struct *tracee) +{ + return utrace_attach_task(tracee, UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_OPS, + &ptrace_utrace_ops, NULL); +} + +static int utrace_barrier_uninterruptible(struct task_struct *target, + struct utrace_engine *engine) +{ + for (;;) { + int err = utrace_barrier(target, engine); + + if (err != -ERESTARTSYS) + return err; + + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); + } +} + +static struct utrace_engine * +ptrace_reuse_engine(struct task_struct *tracee) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine; + struct ptrace_context *ctx; + int err = -EPERM; + + engine = ptrace_lookup_engine(tracee); + if (IS_ERR(engine)) + return engine; + + ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + if (unlikely(ctx->options == PTRACE_O_DETACHED)) { + /* + * Try to reuse this self-detaching engine. + * The only caller which can hit this case is ptrace_attach(), + * it holds ->cred_guard_mutex. + */ + ctx->options = 0; + ctx->eventmsg = 0; + + /* make sure we don't get unwanted reports */ + err = utrace_set_events(tracee, engine, UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE)); + if (!err || err == -EINPROGRESS) { + ctx->resume = UTRACE_RESUME; + /* synchronize with ptrace_report_signal() */ + err = utrace_barrier_uninterruptible(tracee, engine); + } + + if (!err) { + WARN_ON(engine->ops != &ptrace_utrace_ops && + !tracee->exit_state); + return engine; + } + + WARN_ON(engine->ops == &ptrace_utrace_ops); + } + + utrace_engine_put(engine); + return ERR_PTR(err); +} + +static struct utrace_engine * +ptrace_attach_engine(struct task_struct *tracee) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine; + struct ptrace_context *ctx; + + if (unlikely(task_utrace_flags(tracee))) { + engine = ptrace_reuse_engine(tracee); + if (!IS_ERR(engine) || IS_ERR(engine) == -EPERM) + return engine; + } + + ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (unlikely(!ctx)) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + ctx->resume = UTRACE_RESUME; + + engine = utrace_attach_task(tracee, UTRACE_ATTACH_CREATE | + UTRACE_ATTACH_EXCLUSIVE | + UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_OPS, + &ptrace_utrace_ops, ctx); + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(engine))) { + if (engine != ERR_PTR(-ESRCH) && + engine != ERR_PTR(-ERESTARTNOINTR)) + engine = ERR_PTR(-EPERM); + kfree(ctx); + } + + return engine; +} + +static inline int ptrace_set_events(struct task_struct *target, + struct utrace_engine *engine, + unsigned long options) +{ + struct ptrace_context *ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + /* + * We need QUIESCE for resume handling, CLONE to check + * for CLONE_PTRACE, other events are always reported. + */ + unsigned long events = UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE) | UTRACE_EVENT(CLONE) | + UTRACE_EVENT(EXEC) | UTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL_ALL; + + ctx->options = options; + if (options & PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT) + events |= UTRACE_EVENT(EXIT); + + return utrace_set_events(target, engine, events); +} + +/* + * Attach a utrace engine for ptrace and set up its event mask. + * Returns error code or 0 on success. + */ +static int ptrace_attach_task(struct task_struct *tracee, int options) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine; + int err; + + engine = ptrace_attach_engine(tracee); + if (IS_ERR(engine)) + return PTR_ERR(engine); + /* + * It can fail only if the tracee is dead, the caller + * must notice this before setting PT_UTRACED. + */ + err = ptrace_set_events(tracee, engine, options); + WARN_ON(err && !tracee->exit_state); + utrace_engine_put(engine); + return 0; +} + +static int ptrace_wake_up(struct task_struct *tracee, + struct utrace_engine *engine, + enum utrace_resume_action action, + bool force_wakeup) +{ + if (force_wakeup) { + unsigned long flags; + /* + * Preserve the compatibility bug. Historically ptrace + * wakes up the tracee even if it should not. Clear + * SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED for utrace_wakeup(). + */ + if (lock_task_sighand(tracee, &flags)) { + tracee->signal->flags &= ~SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED; + unlock_task_sighand(tracee, &flags); + } + } + + if (action != UTRACE_REPORT) + ptrace_context(engine)->stop_code = 0; + + return utrace_control(tracee, engine, action); +} + +static void ptrace_detach_task(struct task_struct *tracee, int sig) +{ + /* + * If true, the caller is PTRACE_DETACH, otherwise + * the tracer detaches implicitly during exit. + */ + bool explicit = (sig >= 0); + struct utrace_engine *engine = ptrace_lookup_engine(tracee); + enum utrace_resume_action action = UTRACE_DETACH; + struct ptrace_context *ctx; + + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(engine))) + return; + + ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + + if (!explicit) { + int err; + + /* + * We are going to detach, the tracee can be running. + * Ensure ptrace_report_signal() won't report a signal. + */ + ctx->resume = UTRACE_DETACH; + err = utrace_barrier_uninterruptible(tracee, engine); + + if (!err && ctx->siginfo) { + /* + * The tracee has already reported a signal + * before utrace_barrier(). + * + * Resume it like we do in PTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL + * case below. The difference is that we can race + * with ptrace_report_signal() if the tracee is + * running but this doesn't matter. In any case + * UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT must be pending and it + * can return nothing but UTRACE_DETACH. + */ + action = UTRACE_RESUME; + } + + } else if (sig) { + switch (get_stop_event(ctx)) { + case PTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL: + send_sig_info(sig, SEND_SIG_PRIV, tracee); + break; + + case PTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL: + ctx->signr = sig; + ctx->resume = UTRACE_DETACH; + action = UTRACE_RESUME; + break; + } + } + + ptrace_wake_up(tracee, engine, action, explicit); + + if (action != UTRACE_DETACH) + ctx->options = PTRACE_O_DETACHED; + + utrace_engine_put(engine); +} + +static void ptrace_abort_attach(struct task_struct *tracee) +{ + ptrace_detach_task(tracee, 0); +} + +static u32 ptrace_report_exit(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + long orig_code, long *code) +{ + struct ptrace_context *ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + + WARN_ON(ptrace_event_pending(ctx) && + !signal_group_exit(current->signal)); + + set_stop_code(ctx, PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT); + ctx->eventmsg = *code; + + return UTRACE_STOP; +} + +static void ptrace_clone_attach(struct task_struct *child, + int options) +{ + struct task_struct *parent = current; + struct task_struct *tracer; + bool abort = true; + + if (unlikely(ptrace_attach_task(child, options))) { + WARN_ON(1); + return; + } + + write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + tracer = parent->parent; + if (!(tracer->flags & PF_EXITING) && parent->ptrace) { + child->ptrace = parent->ptrace; + __ptrace_link(child, tracer); + abort = false; + } + write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + if (unlikely(abort)) { + ptrace_abort_attach(child); + return; + } + + sigaddset(&child->pending.signal, SIGSTOP); + set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SIGPENDING); +} + +static u32 ptrace_report_clone(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + unsigned long clone_flags, + struct task_struct *child) +{ + struct ptrace_context *ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + int event = 0; + + WARN_ON(ptrace_event_pending(ctx)); + + if (clone_flags & CLONE_UNTRACED) { + /* no events reported */ + } else if (clone_flags & CLONE_VFORK) { + if (ctx->options & PTRACE_O_TRACEVFORK) + event = PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK; + else if (ctx->options & PTRACE_O_TRACEVFORKDONE) + event = PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK_DONE; + } else if ((clone_flags & CSIGNAL) != SIGCHLD) { + if (ctx->options & PTRACE_O_TRACECLONE) + event = PTRACE_EVENT_CLONE; + } else if (ctx->options & PTRACE_O_TRACEFORK) { + event = PTRACE_EVENT_FORK; + } + /* + * Any of these reports implies auto-attaching the new child. + * So does CLONE_PTRACE, even with no event to report. + */ + if ((event && event != PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK_DONE) || + (clone_flags & CLONE_PTRACE)) + ptrace_clone_attach(child, ctx->options); + + if (!event) + return UTRACE_RESUME; + + set_stop_code(ctx, event); + ctx->eventmsg = child->pid; + /* + * We shouldn't stop now, inside the do_fork() path. + * We will stop later, before return to user-mode. + */ + if (event == PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK_DONE) + return UTRACE_REPORT; + else + return UTRACE_STOP; +} + +static inline void set_syscall_code(struct ptrace_context *ctx) +{ + set_stop_code(ctx, PTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL); + if (ctx->options & PTRACE_O_TRACESYSGOOD) + ctx->stop_code |= 0x80; +} + +static u32 ptrace_report_syscall_entry(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + struct ptrace_context *ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + + if (action & UTRACE_SYSCALL_RESUMED) { + /* + * We already reported the first time. + * Nothing more to do now. + */ + if (unlikely(ctx->options & PTRACE_O_SYSEMU)) + return UTRACE_SYSCALL_ABORT | UTRACE_REPORT; + return utrace_syscall_action(action) | UTRACE_RESUME; + } + + WARN_ON(ptrace_event_pending(ctx)); + + set_syscall_code(ctx); + + if (unlikely(ctx->options & PTRACE_O_SYSEMU)) + return UTRACE_SYSCALL_ABORT | UTRACE_REPORT; + /* + * Stop now to report. We will get another callback after + * we resume, with the UTRACE_SYSCALL_RESUMED flag set. + */ + return UTRACE_SYSCALL_RUN | UTRACE_STOP; +} + +static inline bool is_step_resume(enum utrace_resume_action resume) +{ + return resume == UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP || resume == UTRACE_SINGLESTEP; +} + +static u32 ptrace_report_syscall_exit(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + struct ptrace_context *ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + + if (ptrace_event_pending(ctx)) + return UTRACE_STOP; + + if (is_step_resume(ctx->resume)) { + ctx->signr = SIGTRAP; + return UTRACE_INTERRUPT; + } + + set_syscall_code(ctx); + return UTRACE_STOP; +} + +static u32 ptrace_report_exec(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + const struct linux_binfmt *fmt, + const struct linux_binprm *bprm, + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + struct ptrace_context *ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + + WARN_ON(ptrace_event_pending(ctx)); + + if (!(ctx->options & PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC)) { + /* + * Old-fashioned ptrace'd exec just posts a plain signal. + */ + send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 0); + return UTRACE_RESUME; + } + + set_stop_code(ctx, PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC); + return UTRACE_STOP; +} + +static enum utrace_signal_action resume_signal(struct ptrace_context *ctx, + struct k_sigaction *return_ka) +{ + siginfo_t *info = ctx->siginfo; + int signr = ctx->signr; + + ctx->siginfo = NULL; + ctx->signr = 0; + + /* Did the debugger cancel the sig? */ + if (!signr) + return UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN; + /* + * Update the siginfo structure if the signal has changed. + * If the debugger wanted something specific in the siginfo + * then it should have updated *info via PTRACE_SETSIGINFO. + */ + if (info->si_signo != signr) { + info->si_signo = signr; + info->si_errno = 0; + info->si_code = SI_USER; + info->si_pid = task_pid_vnr(current->parent); + info->si_uid = task_uid(current->parent); + } + + /* If the (new) signal is now blocked, requeue it. */ + if (sigismember(¤t->blocked, signr)) { + send_sig_info(signr, info, current); + return UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN; + } + + spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); + *return_ka = current->sighand->action[signr - 1]; + spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); + + return UTRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVER; +} + +static u32 ptrace_report_signal(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + struct pt_regs *regs, + siginfo_t *info, + const struct k_sigaction *orig_ka, + struct k_sigaction *return_ka) +{ + struct ptrace_context *ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + enum utrace_resume_action resume = ctx->resume; + + if (ptrace_event_pending(ctx)) { + action = utrace_signal_action(action); + WARN_ON(action != UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT); + return action | UTRACE_STOP; + } + + switch (utrace_signal_action(action)) { + case UTRACE_SIGNAL_HANDLER: + if (WARN_ON(ctx->siginfo)) + ctx->siginfo = NULL; + + if (is_step_resume(resume)) { + set_stop_code(ctx, PTRACE_EVENT_SIGTRAP); + return UTRACE_STOP | UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN; + } + + case UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT: + if (!ctx->siginfo) { + if (ctx->signr) { + /* set by ptrace_resume(SYSCALL_EXIT) */ + WARN_ON(ctx->signr != SIGTRAP); + user_single_step_siginfo(current, regs, info); + force_sig_info(SIGTRAP, info, current); + } + + return resume | UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN; + } + + if (WARN_ON(ctx->siginfo != info)) + return resume | UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN; + + return resume | resume_signal(ctx, return_ka); + + default: + break; + } + + WARN_ON(ctx->siginfo); + + /* Raced with the exiting tracer ? */ + if (resume == UTRACE_DETACH) + return action; + + ctx->siginfo = info; + /* + * ctx->siginfo points to the caller's stack. + * Make sure the subsequent UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT clears + * ->siginfo before return from get_signal_to_deliver(). + */ + if (utrace_control(current, engine, UTRACE_INTERRUPT)) + WARN_ON(1); + + ctx->signr = info->si_signo; + ctx->stop_code = (PTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL << 8) | ctx->signr; + + return UTRACE_STOP | UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN; +} + +static u32 ptrace_report_quiesce(u32 action, struct utrace_engine *engine, + unsigned long event) +{ + struct ptrace_context *ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + + if (ptrace_event_pending(ctx)) + return UTRACE_STOP; + + return event ? UTRACE_RESUME : ctx->resume; +} + +static void ptrace_release(void *data) +{ + kfree(data); +} + +static const struct utrace_engine_ops ptrace_utrace_ops = { + .report_signal = ptrace_report_signal, + .report_quiesce = ptrace_report_quiesce, + .report_exec = ptrace_report_exec, + .report_exit = ptrace_report_exit, + .report_clone = ptrace_report_clone, + .report_syscall_entry = ptrace_report_syscall_entry, + .report_syscall_exit = ptrace_report_syscall_exit, + .release = ptrace_release, +}; + +int ptrace_check_attach(struct task_struct *child, int kill) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine; + struct utrace_examiner exam; + int ret = -ESRCH; + + engine = ptrace_lookup_engine(child); + if (IS_ERR(engine)) + return ret; + + if (child->parent != current) + goto out; + + if (unlikely(kill)) + ret = 0; + + if (!task_is_stopped_or_traced(child)) + goto out; + /* + * Make sure our engine has already stopped the child. + * Then wait for it to be off the CPU. + */ + if (!utrace_control(child, engine, UTRACE_STOP) && + !utrace_prepare_examine(child, engine, &exam)) + ret = 0; +out: + utrace_engine_put(engine); + return ret; +} + +int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task) +{ + int retval; + + audit_ptrace(task); + + retval = -EPERM; + if (unlikely(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) + goto out; + if (same_thread_group(task, current)) + goto out; + + /* + * Protect exec's credential calculations against our interference; + * interference; SUID, SGID and LSM creds get determined differently + * under ptrace. + */ + retval = -ERESTARTNOINTR; + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex)) + goto out; + + task_lock(task); + retval = __ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH); + task_unlock(task); + if (retval) + goto unlock_creds; + + retval = ptrace_attach_task(task, 0); + if (unlikely(retval)) + goto unlock_creds; + + write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + retval = -EPERM; + if (unlikely(task->exit_state)) + goto unlock_tasklist; + + BUG_ON(task->ptrace); + task->ptrace = PT_UTRACED; + if (capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE)) + task->ptrace |= PT_PTRACE_CAP; + + __ptrace_link(task, current); + send_sig_info(SIGSTOP, SEND_SIG_FORCED, task); + + retval = 0; +unlock_tasklist: + write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); +unlock_creds: + mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex); +out: + return retval; +} + +/* + * Performs checks and sets PT_UTRACED. + * Should be used by all ptrace implementations for PTRACE_TRACEME. + */ +int ptrace_traceme(void) +{ + bool detach = true; + int ret = ptrace_attach_task(current, 0); + + if (unlikely(ret)) + return ret; + + ret = -EPERM; + write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + BUG_ON(current->ptrace); + ret = security_ptrace_traceme(current->parent); + /* + * Check PF_EXITING to ensure ->real_parent has not passed + * exit_ptrace(). Otherwise we don't report the error but + * pretend ->real_parent untraces us right after return. + */ + if (!ret && !(current->real_parent->flags & PF_EXITING)) { + current->ptrace = PT_UTRACED; + __ptrace_link(current, current->real_parent); + detach = false; + } + write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + + if (detach) + ptrace_abort_attach(current); + return ret; +} + +static void ptrace_do_detach(struct task_struct *tracee, unsigned int data) +{ + bool detach, release; + + write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + /* + * This tracee can be already killed. Make sure de_thread() or + * our sub-thread doing do_wait() didn't do release_task() yet. + */ + detach = tracee->ptrace != 0; + release = false; + if (likely(detach)) + release = __ptrace_detach(current, tracee); + write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + + if (unlikely(release)) + release_task(tracee); + else if (likely(detach)) + ptrace_detach_task(tracee, data); +} + +static int ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int data) +{ + if (!valid_signal(data)) + return -EIO; + + ptrace_do_detach(child, data); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on. Called with tasklist held + * for writing, and returns with it held too. But note it can release + * and reacquire the lock. + */ +void exit_ptrace(struct task_struct *tracer) +{ + bool locked = true; + + for (;;) { + struct task_struct *tracee = NULL; + + if (!locked) + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); + if (!list_empty(&tracer->ptraced)) { + tracee = list_first_entry(&tracer->ptraced, + struct task_struct, ptrace_entry); + get_task_struct(tracee); + } + if (!locked) + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + if (!tracee) + break; + + if (locked) { + write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); + locked = false; + } + ptrace_do_detach(tracee, -1); + put_task_struct(tracee); + } + + if (!locked) + write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); +} + +static int ptrace_set_options(struct task_struct *tracee, + struct utrace_engine *engine, long data) +{ + BUILD_BUG_ON(PTRACE_O_MASK & (PTRACE_O_SYSEMU | PTRACE_O_DETACHED)); + + ptrace_set_events(tracee, engine, data & PTRACE_O_MASK); + return (data & ~PTRACE_O_MASK) ? -EINVAL : 0; +} + +static int ptrace_rw_siginfo(struct task_struct *tracee, + struct ptrace_context *ctx, + siginfo_t *info, bool write) +{ + unsigned long flags; + int err; + + switch (get_stop_event(ctx)) { + case 0: /* jctl stop */ + return -EINVAL; + + case PTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL: + err = -ESRCH; + if (lock_task_sighand(tracee, &flags)) { + if (likely(task_is_traced(tracee))) { + if (write) + *ctx->siginfo = *info; + else + *info = *ctx->siginfo; + err = 0; + } + unlock_task_sighand(tracee, &flags); + } + + return err; + + default: + if (!write) { + memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info)); + info->si_signo = SIGTRAP; + info->si_code = ctx->stop_code & PTRACE_EVENT_MASK; + info->si_pid = task_pid_vnr(tracee); + info->si_uid = task_uid(tracee); + } + + return 0; + } +} + +static void do_ptrace_notify_stop(struct ptrace_context *ctx, + struct task_struct *tracee) +{ + /* + * This can race with SIGKILL, but we borrow this race from + * the old ptrace implementation. ->exit_code is only needed + * for wait_task_stopped()->task_stopped_code(), we should + * change it to use ptrace_context. + */ + tracee->exit_code = ctx->stop_code & PTRACE_EVENT_MASK; + WARN_ON(!tracee->exit_code); + + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); + /* + * Don't want to allow preemption here, because + * sys_ptrace() needs this task to be inactive. + */ + preempt_disable(); + /* + * It can be killed and then released by our subthread, + * or ptrace_attach() has not completed yet. + */ + if (task_ptrace(tracee)) + do_notify_parent_cldstop(tracee, CLD_TRAPPED); + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + preempt_enable_no_resched(); +} + +void ptrace_notify_stop(struct task_struct *tracee) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine = ptrace_lookup_engine(tracee); + + if (IS_ERR(engine)) + return; + + do_ptrace_notify_stop(ptrace_context(engine), tracee); + utrace_engine_put(engine); +} + +static int ptrace_resume_action(struct task_struct *tracee, + struct utrace_engine *engine, long request) +{ + struct ptrace_context *ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + unsigned long events; + int action; + + ctx->options &= ~PTRACE_O_SYSEMU; + events = engine->flags & ~UTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL; + action = UTRACE_RESUME; + + switch (request) { +#ifdef PTRACE_SINGLEBLOCK + case PTRACE_SINGLEBLOCK: + if (unlikely(!arch_has_block_step())) + return -EIO; + action = UTRACE_BLOCKSTEP; + events |= UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_EXIT); + break; +#endif + +#ifdef PTRACE_SINGLESTEP + case PTRACE_SINGLESTEP: + if (unlikely(!arch_has_single_step())) + return -EIO; + action = UTRACE_SINGLESTEP; + events |= UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_EXIT); + break; +#endif + +#ifdef PTRACE_SYSEMU + case PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP: + if (unlikely(!arch_has_single_step())) + return -EIO; + action = UTRACE_SINGLESTEP; + case PTRACE_SYSEMU: + ctx->options |= PTRACE_O_SYSEMU; + events |= UTRACE_EVENT(SYSCALL_ENTRY); + break; +#endif + + case PTRACE_SYSCALL: + events |= UTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL; + break; + + case PTRACE_CONT: + break; + default: + return -EIO; + } + + if (events != engine->flags && + utrace_set_events(tracee, engine, events)) + return -ESRCH; + + return action; +} + +static int ptrace_resume(struct task_struct *tracee, + struct utrace_engine *engine, + long request, long data) +{ + struct ptrace_context *ctx = ptrace_context(engine); + int action; + + if (!valid_signal(data)) + return -EIO; + + action = ptrace_resume_action(tracee, engine, request); + if (action < 0) + return action; + + switch (get_stop_event(ctx)) { + case PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK: + if (ctx->options & PTRACE_O_TRACEVFORKDONE) { + set_stop_code(ctx, PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK_DONE); + action = UTRACE_REPORT; + } + break; + + case PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC: + case PTRACE_EVENT_FORK: + case PTRACE_EVENT_CLONE: + case PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK_DONE: + if (request == PTRACE_SYSCALL) { + set_syscall_code(ctx); + do_ptrace_notify_stop(ctx, tracee); + return 0; + } + + if (action != UTRACE_RESUME) { + /* + * single-stepping. UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT will + * synthesize a trap to follow the syscall insn. + */ + ctx->signr = SIGTRAP; + action = UTRACE_INTERRUPT; + } + break; + + case PTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL: + if (data) + send_sig_info(data, SEND_SIG_PRIV, tracee); + break; + + case PTRACE_EVENT_SIGNAL: + ctx->signr = data; + break; + } + + ctx->resume = action; + ptrace_wake_up(tracee, engine, action, true); + return 0; +} + +extern int ptrace_regset(struct task_struct *task, int req, unsigned int type, + struct iovec *kiov); + +int ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, long request, + unsigned long addr, unsigned long data) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine = ptrace_lookup_engine(child); + siginfo_t siginfo; + int ret; + + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(engine))) + return -ESRCH; + + switch (request) { + case PTRACE_PEEKTEXT: + case PTRACE_PEEKDATA: + ret = generic_ptrace_peekdata(child, addr, data); + break; + case PTRACE_POKETEXT: + case PTRACE_POKEDATA: + ret = generic_ptrace_pokedata(child, addr, data); + break; + +#ifdef PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS + case PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS: +#endif + case PTRACE_SETOPTIONS: + ret = ptrace_set_options(child, engine, data); + break; + case PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG: + ret = put_user(ptrace_context(engine)->eventmsg, + (unsigned long __user *) data); + break; + + case PTRACE_GETSIGINFO: + ret = ptrace_rw_siginfo(child, ptrace_context(engine), + &siginfo, false); + if (!ret) + ret = copy_siginfo_to_user((siginfo_t __user *) data, + &siginfo); + break; + + case PTRACE_SETSIGINFO: + if (copy_from_user(&siginfo, (siginfo_t __user *) data, + sizeof siginfo)) + ret = -EFAULT; + else + ret = ptrace_rw_siginfo(child, ptrace_context(engine), + &siginfo, true); + break; + + case PTRACE_DETACH: /* detach a process that was attached. */ + ret = ptrace_detach(child, data); + break; + + case PTRACE_KILL: + /* Ugly historical behaviour. */ + if (task_is_traced(child)) + ptrace_resume(child, engine, PTRACE_CONT, SIGKILL); + ret = 0; + break; + + case PTRACE_GETREGSET: + case PTRACE_SETREGSET: + { + struct iovec kiov; + struct iovec __user *uiov = (struct iovec __user *) data; + + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uiov, sizeof(*uiov))) + return -EFAULT; + + if (__get_user(kiov.iov_base, &uiov->iov_base) || + __get_user(kiov.iov_len, &uiov->iov_len)) + return -EFAULT; + + ret = ptrace_regset(child, request, addr, &kiov); + if (!ret) + ret = __put_user(kiov.iov_len, &uiov->iov_len); + break; + } + + default: + ret = ptrace_resume(child, engine, request, data); + break; + } + + utrace_engine_put(engine); + return ret; +} + +#if defined CONFIG_COMPAT +#include + +int compat_ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, compat_long_t request, + compat_ulong_t addr, compat_ulong_t data) +{ + struct utrace_engine *engine = ptrace_lookup_engine(child); + compat_ulong_t __user *datap = compat_ptr(data); + compat_ulong_t word; + siginfo_t siginfo; + int ret; + + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(engine))) + return -ESRCH; + + switch (request) { + case PTRACE_PEEKTEXT: + case PTRACE_PEEKDATA: + ret = access_process_vm(child, addr, &word, sizeof(word), 0); + if (ret != sizeof(word)) + ret = -EIO; + else + ret = put_user(word, datap); + break; + + case PTRACE_POKETEXT: + case PTRACE_POKEDATA: + ret = access_process_vm(child, addr, &data, sizeof(data), 1); + ret = (ret != sizeof(data) ? -EIO : 0); + break; + + case PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG: + ret = put_user((compat_ulong_t)ptrace_context(engine)->eventmsg, + datap); + break; + + case PTRACE_GETSIGINFO: + ret = ptrace_rw_siginfo(child, ptrace_context(engine), + &siginfo, false); + if (!ret) + ret = copy_siginfo_to_user32( + (struct compat_siginfo __user *) datap, + &siginfo); + break; + + case PTRACE_SETSIGINFO: + memset(&siginfo, 0, sizeof siginfo); + if (copy_siginfo_from_user32( + &siginfo, (struct compat_siginfo __user *) datap)) + ret = -EFAULT; + else + ret = ptrace_rw_siginfo(child, ptrace_context(engine), + &siginfo, true); + break; + + case PTRACE_GETREGSET: + case PTRACE_SETREGSET: + { + struct iovec kiov; + struct compat_iovec __user *uiov = + (struct compat_iovec __user *) datap; + compat_uptr_t ptr; + compat_size_t len; + + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uiov, sizeof(*uiov))) + return -EFAULT; + + if (__get_user(ptr, &uiov->iov_base) || + __get_user(len, &uiov->iov_len)) + return -EFAULT; + + kiov.iov_base = compat_ptr(ptr); + kiov.iov_len = len; + + ret = ptrace_regset(child, request, addr, &kiov); + if (!ret) + ret = __put_user(kiov.iov_len, &uiov->iov_len); + break; + } + + default: + ret = ptrace_request(child, request, addr, data); + } + + utrace_engine_put(engine); + return ret; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */ diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c index 72e7ad4..ecfba8a 100644 --- a/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ #include #include - /* * ptrace a task: make the debugger its new parent and * move it to the ptrace list. @@ -38,6 +37,323 @@ void __ptrace_link(struct task_struct *child, struct task_struct *new_parent) child->parent = new_parent; } +int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode) +{ + const struct cred *cred = current_cred(), *tcred; + + /* May we inspect the given task? + * This check is used both for attaching with ptrace + * and for allowing access to sensitive information in /proc. + * + * ptrace_attach denies several cases that /proc allows + * because setting up the necessary parent/child relationship + * or halting the specified task is impossible. + */ + int dumpable = 0; + /* Don't let security modules deny introspection */ + if (task == current) + return 0; + rcu_read_lock(); + tcred = __task_cred(task); + if (cred->user->user_ns == tcred->user->user_ns && + (cred->uid == tcred->euid && + cred->uid == tcred->suid && + cred->uid == tcred->uid && + cred->gid == tcred->egid && + cred->gid == tcred->sgid && + cred->gid == tcred->gid)) + goto ok; + if (ns_capable(tcred->user->user_ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE)) + goto ok; + rcu_read_unlock(); + return -EPERM; +ok: + rcu_read_unlock(); + smp_rmb(); + if (task->mm) + dumpable = get_dumpable(task->mm); + if (!dumpable && !task_ns_capable(task, CAP_SYS_PTRACE)) + return -EPERM; + + return security_ptrace_access_check(task, mode); +} + +bool ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode) +{ + int err; + task_lock(task); + err = __ptrace_may_access(task, mode); + task_unlock(task); + return !err; +} + +/* + * Called with irqs disabled, returns true if childs should reap themselves. + */ +static int ignoring_children(struct sighand_struct *sigh) +{ + int ret; + spin_lock(&sigh->siglock); + ret = (sigh->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN) || + (sigh->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_flags & SA_NOCLDWAIT); + spin_unlock(&sigh->siglock); + return ret; +} + +/* + * Called with tasklist_lock held for writing. + * Unlink a traced task, and clean it up if it was a traced zombie. + * Return true if it needs to be reaped with release_task(). + * (We can't call release_task() here because we already hold tasklist_lock.) + * + * If it's a zombie, our attachedness prevented normal parent notification + * or self-reaping. Do notification now if it would have happened earlier. + * If it should reap itself, return true. + * + * If it's our own child, there is no notification to do. But if our normal + * children self-reap, then this child was prevented by ptrace and we must + * reap it now, in that case we must also wake up sub-threads sleeping in + * do_wait(). + */ +bool __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *tracer, struct task_struct *p) +{ + __ptrace_unlink(p); + + if (p->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE) { + if (!task_detached(p) && thread_group_empty(p)) { + if (!same_thread_group(p->real_parent, tracer)) + do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal); + else if (ignoring_children(tracer->sighand)) { + __wake_up_parent(p, tracer); + p->exit_signal = -1; + } + } + if (task_detached(p)) { + /* Mark it as in the process of being reaped. */ + p->exit_state = EXIT_DEAD; + return true; + } + } + + return false; +} + +int ptrace_readdata(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long src, char __user *dst, int len) +{ + int copied = 0; + + while (len > 0) { + char buf[128]; + int this_len, retval; + + this_len = (len > sizeof(buf)) ? sizeof(buf) : len; + retval = access_process_vm(tsk, src, buf, this_len, 0); + if (!retval) { + if (copied) + break; + return -EIO; + } + if (copy_to_user(dst, buf, retval)) + return -EFAULT; + copied += retval; + src += retval; + dst += retval; + len -= retval; + } + return copied; +} + +int ptrace_writedata(struct task_struct *tsk, char __user *src, unsigned long dst, int len) +{ + int copied = 0; + + while (len > 0) { + char buf[128]; + int this_len, retval; + + this_len = (len > sizeof(buf)) ? sizeof(buf) : len; + if (copy_from_user(buf, src, this_len)) + return -EFAULT; + retval = access_process_vm(tsk, dst, buf, this_len, 1); + if (!retval) { + if (copied) + break; + return -EIO; + } + copied += retval; + src += retval; + dst += retval; + len -= retval; + } + return copied; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK + +static const struct user_regset * +find_regset(const struct user_regset_view *view, unsigned int type) +{ + const struct user_regset *regset; + int n; + + for (n = 0; n < view->n; ++n) { + regset = view->regsets + n; + if (regset->core_note_type == type) + return regset; + } + + return NULL; +} + +int ptrace_regset(struct task_struct *task, int req, unsigned int type, + struct iovec *kiov) +{ + const struct user_regset_view *view = task_user_regset_view(task); + const struct user_regset *regset = find_regset(view, type); + int regset_no; + + if (!regset || (kiov->iov_len % regset->size) != 0) + return -EINVAL; + + regset_no = regset - view->regsets; + kiov->iov_len = min(kiov->iov_len, + (__kernel_size_t) (regset->n * regset->size)); + + if (req == PTRACE_GETREGSET) + return copy_regset_to_user(task, view, regset_no, 0, + kiov->iov_len, kiov->iov_base); + else + return copy_regset_from_user(task, view, regset_no, 0, + kiov->iov_len, kiov->iov_base); +} + +#endif + +static struct task_struct *ptrace_get_task_struct(pid_t pid) +{ + struct task_struct *child; + + rcu_read_lock(); + child = find_task_by_vpid(pid); + if (child) + get_task_struct(child); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + if (!child) + return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH); + return child; +} + +#ifndef arch_ptrace_attach +#define arch_ptrace_attach(child) do { } while (0) +#endif + +SYSCALL_DEFINE4(ptrace, long, request, long, pid, unsigned long, addr, + unsigned long, data) +{ + struct task_struct *child; + long ret; + + if (request == PTRACE_TRACEME) { + ret = ptrace_traceme(); + if (!ret) + arch_ptrace_attach(current); + goto out; + } + + child = ptrace_get_task_struct(pid); + if (IS_ERR(child)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(child); + goto out; + } + + if (request == PTRACE_ATTACH) { + ret = ptrace_attach(child); + /* + * Some architectures need to do book-keeping after + * a ptrace attach. + */ + if (!ret) + arch_ptrace_attach(child); + goto out_put_task_struct; + } + + ret = ptrace_check_attach(child, request == PTRACE_KILL); + if (ret < 0) + goto out_put_task_struct; + + ret = arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data); + + out_put_task_struct: + put_task_struct(child); + out: + return ret; +} + +int generic_ptrace_peekdata(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr, + unsigned long data) +{ + unsigned long tmp; + int copied; + + copied = access_process_vm(tsk, addr, &tmp, sizeof(tmp), 0); + if (copied != sizeof(tmp)) + return -EIO; + return put_user(tmp, (unsigned long __user *)data); +} + +int generic_ptrace_pokedata(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr, + unsigned long data) +{ + int copied; + + copied = access_process_vm(tsk, addr, &data, sizeof(data), 1); + return (copied == sizeof(data)) ? 0 : -EIO; +} + +#if defined CONFIG_COMPAT +#include + +asmlinkage long compat_sys_ptrace(compat_long_t request, compat_long_t pid, + compat_long_t addr, compat_long_t data) +{ + struct task_struct *child; + long ret; + + if (request == PTRACE_TRACEME) { + ret = ptrace_traceme(); + goto out; + } + + child = ptrace_get_task_struct(pid); + if (IS_ERR(child)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(child); + goto out; + } + + if (request == PTRACE_ATTACH) { + ret = ptrace_attach(child); + /* + * Some architectures need to do book-keeping after + * a ptrace attach. + */ + if (!ret) + arch_ptrace_attach(child); + goto out_put_task_struct; + } + + ret = ptrace_check_attach(child, request == PTRACE_KILL); + if (!ret) + ret = compat_arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data); + + out_put_task_struct: + put_task_struct(child); + out: + return ret; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */ + +#ifndef CONFIG_UTRACE /* * Turn a tracing stop into a normal stop now, since with no tracer there * would be no way to wake it up with SIGCONT or SIGKILL. If there was a @@ -117,57 +433,7 @@ int ptrace_check_attach(struct task_struct *child, int kill) return ret; } -int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode) -{ - const struct cred *cred = current_cred(), *tcred; - - /* May we inspect the given task? - * This check is used both for attaching with ptrace - * and for allowing access to sensitive information in /proc. - * - * ptrace_attach denies several cases that /proc allows - * because setting up the necessary parent/child relationship - * or halting the specified task is impossible. - */ - int dumpable = 0; - /* Don't let security modules deny introspection */ - if (task == current) - return 0; - rcu_read_lock(); - tcred = __task_cred(task); - if (cred->user->user_ns == tcred->user->user_ns && - (cred->uid == tcred->euid && - cred->uid == tcred->suid && - cred->uid == tcred->uid && - cred->gid == tcred->egid && - cred->gid == tcred->sgid && - cred->gid == tcred->gid)) - goto ok; - if (ns_capable(tcred->user->user_ns, CAP_SYS_PTRACE)) - goto ok; - rcu_read_unlock(); - return -EPERM; -ok: - rcu_read_unlock(); - smp_rmb(); - if (task->mm) - dumpable = get_dumpable(task->mm); - if (!dumpable && !task_ns_capable(task, CAP_SYS_PTRACE)) - return -EPERM; - - return security_ptrace_access_check(task, mode); -} - -bool ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode) -{ - int err; - task_lock(task); - err = __ptrace_may_access(task, mode); - task_unlock(task); - return !err; -} - -static int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task) +int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task) { int retval; @@ -223,7 +489,7 @@ out: * Performs checks and sets PT_PTRACED. * Should be used by all ptrace implementations for PTRACE_TRACEME. */ -static int ptrace_traceme(void) +int ptrace_traceme(void) { int ret = -EPERM; @@ -246,57 +512,6 @@ static int ptrace_traceme(void) return ret; } -/* - * Called with irqs disabled, returns true if childs should reap themselves. - */ -static int ignoring_children(struct sighand_struct *sigh) -{ - int ret; - spin_lock(&sigh->siglock); - ret = (sigh->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN) || - (sigh->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_flags & SA_NOCLDWAIT); - spin_unlock(&sigh->siglock); - return ret; -} - -/* - * Called with tasklist_lock held for writing. - * Unlink a traced task, and clean it up if it was a traced zombie. - * Return true if it needs to be reaped with release_task(). - * (We can't call release_task() here because we already hold tasklist_lock.) - * - * If it's a zombie, our attachedness prevented normal parent notification - * or self-reaping. Do notification now if it would have happened earlier. - * If it should reap itself, return true. - * - * If it's our own child, there is no notification to do. But if our normal - * children self-reap, then this child was prevented by ptrace and we must - * reap it now, in that case we must also wake up sub-threads sleeping in - * do_wait(). - */ -bool __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *tracer, struct task_struct *p) -{ - __ptrace_unlink(p); - - if (p->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE) { - if (!task_detached(p) && thread_group_empty(p)) { - if (!same_thread_group(p->real_parent, tracer)) - do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal); - else if (ignoring_children(tracer->sighand)) { - __wake_up_parent(p, tracer); - p->exit_signal = -1; - } - } - if (task_detached(p)) { - /* Mark it as in the process of being reaped. */ - p->exit_state = EXIT_DEAD; - return true; - } - } - - return false; -} - static int ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int data) { bool dead = false; @@ -356,56 +571,6 @@ void exit_ptrace(struct task_struct *tracer) write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); } -int ptrace_readdata(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long src, char __user *dst, int len) -{ - int copied = 0; - - while (len > 0) { - char buf[128]; - int this_len, retval; - - this_len = (len > sizeof(buf)) ? sizeof(buf) : len; - retval = access_process_vm(tsk, src, buf, this_len, 0); - if (!retval) { - if (copied) - break; - return -EIO; - } - if (copy_to_user(dst, buf, retval)) - return -EFAULT; - copied += retval; - src += retval; - dst += retval; - len -= retval; - } - return copied; -} - -int ptrace_writedata(struct task_struct *tsk, char __user *src, unsigned long dst, int len) -{ - int copied = 0; - - while (len > 0) { - char buf[128]; - int this_len, retval; - - this_len = (len > sizeof(buf)) ? sizeof(buf) : len; - if (copy_from_user(buf, src, this_len)) - return -EFAULT; - retval = access_process_vm(tsk, dst, buf, this_len, 1); - if (!retval) { - if (copied) - break; - return -EIO; - } - copied += retval; - src += retval; - dst += retval; - len -= retval; - } - return copied; -} - static int ptrace_setoptions(struct task_struct *child, unsigned long data) { child->ptrace &= ~PT_TRACE_MASK; @@ -466,7 +631,6 @@ static int ptrace_setsiginfo(struct task_struct *child, const siginfo_t *info) return error; } - #ifdef PTRACE_SINGLESTEP #define is_singlestep(request) ((request) == PTRACE_SINGLESTEP) #else @@ -521,47 +685,6 @@ static int ptrace_resume(struct task_struct *child, long request, return 0; } -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK - -static const struct user_regset * -find_regset(const struct user_regset_view *view, unsigned int type) -{ - const struct user_regset *regset; - int n; - - for (n = 0; n < view->n; ++n) { - regset = view->regsets + n; - if (regset->core_note_type == type) - return regset; - } - - return NULL; -} - -static int ptrace_regset(struct task_struct *task, int req, unsigned int type, - struct iovec *kiov) -{ - const struct user_regset_view *view = task_user_regset_view(task); - const struct user_regset *regset = find_regset(view, type); - int regset_no; - - if (!regset || (kiov->iov_len % regset->size) != 0) - return -EINVAL; - - regset_no = regset - view->regsets; - kiov->iov_len = min(kiov->iov_len, - (__kernel_size_t) (regset->n * regset->size)); - - if (req == PTRACE_GETREGSET) - return copy_regset_to_user(task, view, regset_no, 0, - kiov->iov_len, kiov->iov_base); - else - return copy_regset_from_user(task, view, regset_no, 0, - kiov->iov_len, kiov->iov_base); -} - -#endif - int ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, long request, unsigned long addr, unsigned long data) { @@ -677,91 +800,7 @@ int ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, long request, return ret; } -static struct task_struct *ptrace_get_task_struct(pid_t pid) -{ - struct task_struct *child; - - rcu_read_lock(); - child = find_task_by_vpid(pid); - if (child) - get_task_struct(child); - rcu_read_unlock(); - - if (!child) - return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH); - return child; -} - -#ifndef arch_ptrace_attach -#define arch_ptrace_attach(child) do { } while (0) -#endif - -SYSCALL_DEFINE4(ptrace, long, request, long, pid, unsigned long, addr, - unsigned long, data) -{ - struct task_struct *child; - long ret; - - if (request == PTRACE_TRACEME) { - ret = ptrace_traceme(); - if (!ret) - arch_ptrace_attach(current); - goto out; - } - - child = ptrace_get_task_struct(pid); - if (IS_ERR(child)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(child); - goto out; - } - - if (request == PTRACE_ATTACH) { - ret = ptrace_attach(child); - /* - * Some architectures need to do book-keeping after - * a ptrace attach. - */ - if (!ret) - arch_ptrace_attach(child); - goto out_put_task_struct; - } - - ret = ptrace_check_attach(child, request == PTRACE_KILL); - if (ret < 0) - goto out_put_task_struct; - - ret = arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data); - - out_put_task_struct: - put_task_struct(child); - out: - return ret; -} - -int generic_ptrace_peekdata(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr, - unsigned long data) -{ - unsigned long tmp; - int copied; - - copied = access_process_vm(tsk, addr, &tmp, sizeof(tmp), 0); - if (copied != sizeof(tmp)) - return -EIO; - return put_user(tmp, (unsigned long __user *)data); -} - -int generic_ptrace_pokedata(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr, - unsigned long data) -{ - int copied; - - copied = access_process_vm(tsk, addr, &data, sizeof(data), 1); - return (copied == sizeof(data)) ? 0 : -EIO; -} - #if defined CONFIG_COMPAT -#include - int compat_ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, compat_long_t request, compat_ulong_t addr, compat_ulong_t data) { @@ -839,45 +878,8 @@ int compat_ptrace_request(struct task_struct *child, compat_long_t request, return ret; } - -asmlinkage long compat_sys_ptrace(compat_long_t request, compat_long_t pid, - compat_long_t addr, compat_long_t data) -{ - struct task_struct *child; - long ret; - - if (request == PTRACE_TRACEME) { - ret = ptrace_traceme(); - goto out; - } - - child = ptrace_get_task_struct(pid); - if (IS_ERR(child)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(child); - goto out; - } - - if (request == PTRACE_ATTACH) { - ret = ptrace_attach(child); - /* - * Some architectures need to do book-keeping after - * a ptrace attach. - */ - if (!ret) - arch_ptrace_attach(child); - goto out_put_task_struct; - } - - ret = ptrace_check_attach(child, request == PTRACE_KILL); - if (!ret) - ret = compat_arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data); - - out_put_task_struct: - put_task_struct(child); - out: - return ret; -} #endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */ +#endif /* CONFIG_UTRACE */ #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT int ptrace_get_breakpoints(struct task_struct *tsk) diff --git a/kernel/utrace.c b/kernel/utrace.c index 26d6faf..37dce16 100644 --- a/kernel/utrace.c +++ b/kernel/utrace.c @@ -816,6 +816,22 @@ relock: spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock); spin_unlock(&utrace->lock); + /* + * If ptrace is among the reasons for this stop, do its + * notification now. This could not just be done in + * ptrace's own event report callbacks because it has to + * be done after we are in TASK_TRACED. This makes the + * synchronization with ptrace_do_wait() work right. + * + * It's only because of the bad old overloading of the do_wait() + * logic for handling ptrace stops that we need this special case + * here. One day we will clean up ptrace so it does not need to + * work this way. New things that are designed sensibly don't need + * a wakeup that synchronizes with tasklist_lock and ->state, so + * the proper utrace API does not try to support this weirdness. + */ + ptrace_notify_stop(task); + schedule(); utrace_finish_stop(); -- 1.5.5.1 From oleg at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 16:45:00 2011 From: oleg at redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:45:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110620164500.GA7248@redhat.com> On 06/20, Kyle McMartin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:07:44PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Temporary revert the following patches to keep utrace/utrace-ptrace working: > > > > > > > > This obviously reverts some user-visible fixes, but the fixed problems > > are very old and minor, they were never reported. In the long term we > > need another solution. > > > > Dude, that's just not acceptable, that's way too much offset to deal with > against upstream, Yes, this reverts 20 patches. But they only touch the ptrace/stop paths, there won't be more changes in this area until 3.1. > especially since it's looking like uprobes will get > merged in 3.1... Probably yes. In any case, this series should be dropped when fedora switches to 3.1. I'll try to do something more "clever" for 3.1 if utrace is still needed. Until then we need something for systemtap... Oleg. From kmcmartin at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 16:16:34 2011 From: kmcmartin at redhat.com (Kyle McMartin) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:16:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:07:44PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Temporary revert the following patches to keep utrace/utrace-ptrace working: > > > > This obviously reverts some user-visible fixes, but the fixed problems > are very old and minor, they were never reported. In the long term we > need another solution. > Dude, that's just not acceptable, that's way too much offset to deal with against upstream, especially since it's looking like uprobes will get merged in 3.1... (at least, a lot of the comments seem to have been well-addressed on linux-mm.) --Kyle From davej at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 16:44:24 2011 From: davej at redhat.com (Dave Jones) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:44:24 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:16:34PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:07:44PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Temporary revert the following patches to keep utrace/utrace-ptrace working: > > > > > > > > This obviously reverts some user-visible fixes, but the fixed problems > > are very old and minor, they were never reported. In the long term we > > need another solution. > > Dude, that's just not acceptable, that's way too much offset to deal with > against upstream, especially since it's looking like uprobes will get > merged in 3.1... (at least, a lot of the comments seem to have been > well-addressed on linux-mm.) I have still yet to see a justification why we want to continue carrying utrace in Fedora at all. And "We want it in RHEL" isn't a good enough answer. It's been FIVE years that we carried that thing without it getting upstream. What benefit is there in continuing to carry this thing at all ? Utrace has been an absolute disaster from a merging standpoint. Even Xen didn't take this long to get upstream. Dave From jistone at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 17:18:26 2011 From: jistone at redhat.com (Josh Stone) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:18:26 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4DFF80E2.6090602@redhat.com> On 06/20/2011 09:44 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > What benefit is there in continuing to carry this thing at all ? > Utrace has been an absolute disaster from a merging standpoint. > Even Xen didn't take this long to get upstream. I can't dispute the upstream disappointment, but the obvious benefit is enabling uprobes for systemtap. There are a growing number of packages building in markers with systemtap-sdt-devel for debugging and tracing, so they will expect a way to hook into these. Yes, the impending inode-uprobes will be sufficient for this case, but it's a step backwards in other respects as well. Josh From davej at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 17:28:11 2011 From: davej at redhat.com (Dave Jones) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:28:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <4DFF80E2.6090602@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> <4DFF80E2.6090602@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110620172811.GA14970@redhat.com> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:18:26AM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > On 06/20/2011 09:44 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > > What benefit is there in continuing to carry this thing at all ? > > Utrace has been an absolute disaster from a merging standpoint. > > Even Xen didn't take this long to get upstream. > > I can't dispute the upstream disappointment, but the obvious benefit is > enabling uprobes for systemtap. There are a growing number of packages > building in markers with systemtap-sdt-devel for debugging and tracing, > so they will expect a way to hook into these. Yes, the impending > inode-uprobes will be sufficient for this case, but it's a step > backwards in other respects as well. I'm sure both the Fedora systemtap users will be bummed if it stops working, but the truth is outside of RHEL, and the people who actually work on systemtap, afaics, no-one gives a damn. Dave From jistone at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 17:43:55 2011 From: jistone at redhat.com (Josh Stone) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:43:55 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <20110620172811.GA14970@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> <4DFF80E2.6090602@redhat.com> <20110620172811.GA14970@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4DFF86DB.7090103@redhat.com> On 06/20/2011 10:28 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:18:26AM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > > On 06/20/2011 09:44 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > > > What benefit is there in continuing to carry this thing at all ? > > > Utrace has been an absolute disaster from a merging standpoint. > > > Even Xen didn't take this long to get upstream. > > > > I can't dispute the upstream disappointment, but the obvious benefit is > > enabling uprobes for systemtap. There are a growing number of packages > > building in markers with systemtap-sdt-devel for debugging and tracing, > > so they will expect a way to hook into these. Yes, the impending > > inode-uprobes will be sufficient for this case, but it's a step > > backwards in other respects as well. > > I'm sure both the Fedora systemtap users will be bummed if it stops working, > but the truth is outside of RHEL, and the people who actually work on > systemtap, afaics, no-one gives a damn. Packagers are adding these markers of their own accord, and in most cases are getting them upstream as well. It is only kernel developers who are so hostile/apathetic/etc. Josh From mjg at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 17:52:34 2011 From: mjg at redhat.com (Matthew Garrett) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:52:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <4DFF86DB.7090103@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> <4DFF80E2.6090602@redhat.com> <20110620172811.GA14970@redhat.com> <4DFF86DB.7090103@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110620175234.GA15023@srcf.ucam.org> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:43:55AM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > Packagers are adding these markers of their own accord, and in most > cases are getting them upstream as well. It is only kernel developers > who are so hostile/apathetic/etc. We only deviate from the upstream kernel to fix bugs, backport features or add code that has a clear path to upstream. We do not deviate from the upstream kernel to revert a bunch of upstream fixes in order to add a feature that's been there for half a decade and still isn't upstream, especially when there's been approximately zero user demand for it to appear in Fedora. That's a practical attitude, not a hostile or apathetic one. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org From kmcmartin at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 17:55:13 2011 From: kmcmartin at redhat.com (Kyle McMartin) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:55:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <20110620175234.GA15023@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> <4DFF80E2.6090602@redhat.com> <20110620172811.GA14970@redhat.com> <4DFF86DB.7090103@redhat.com> <20110620175234.GA15023@srcf.ucam.org> Message-ID: <20110620175513.GD19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:52:34PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > We only deviate from the upstream kernel to fix bugs, backport features > or add code that has a clear path to upstream. We do not deviate from > the upstream kernel to revert a bunch of upstream fixes in order to add > a feature that's been there for half a decade and still isn't upstream, > especially when there's been approximately zero user demand for it to > appear in Fedora. That's a practical attitude, not a hostile or > apathetic one. > To be fair to all parties, we have been consistently allowing systemtap to be labelled as a Fedora feature, and to drop support for it would be a regression from that point of view. I don't really have an objection to utrace per se, as it is low impact, just the idea of reverting a bunch of inconvenient code to do it. --Kyle From jistone at redhat.com Mon Jun 20 18:13:15 2011 From: jistone at redhat.com (Josh Stone) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:13:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <20110620175513.GD19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> <4DFF80E2.6090602@redhat.com> <20110620172811.GA14970@redhat.com> <4DFF86DB.7090103@redhat.com> <20110620175234.GA15023@srcf.ucam.org> <20110620175513.GD19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> Message-ID: <4DFF8DBB.7090809@redhat.com> On 06/20/2011 10:52 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > That's a practical attitude, not a hostile or apathetic one. I do feel Dave's response was hostile, but I can appreciate the practical discussions. I was not trying to argue that Oleg's approach is correct - I just want to defend that utrace is still useful. On 06/20/2011 10:55 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > I don't really have an objection to utrace per se, as it is low impact, > just the idea of reverting a bunch of inconvenient code to do it. This point I understand, and I hope Oleg can find a way to bring utrace in without reverting upstream code. Thanks, Josh From oleg at redhat.com Tue Jun 21 15:25:19 2011 From: oleg at redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:25:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <20110620175513.GD19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> <4DFF80E2.6090602@redhat.com> <20110620172811.GA14970@redhat.com> <4DFF86DB.7090103@redhat.com> <20110620175234.GA15023@srcf.ucam.org> <20110620175513.GD19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110621152519.GA5557@redhat.com> On 06/20, Kyle McMartin wrote: > > I don't really have an objection > to utrace per se, as it is low impact, just the idea of reverting a > bunch of inconvenient code to do it. I understand. Once again, it was supposed to be a temporary solution until fedora switches to 3.1. And the reverted code does not make the real difference so far, the user-visible changes are minor. OK, I won't argue. So we need to rework utrace/ptrace in 3.0, then we should do this again in 3.1. I'll try to do something. Oleg. From dsmith at redhat.com Tue Jun 21 16:39:26 2011 From: dsmith at redhat.com (David Smith) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:39:26 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <20110621152519.GA5557@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> <4DFF80E2.6090602@redhat.com> <20110620172811.GA14970@redhat.com> <4DFF86DB.7090103@redhat.com> <20110620175234.GA15023@srcf.ucam.org> <20110620175513.GD19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110621152519.GA5557@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4E00C93E.1030009@redhat.com> On 06/21/2011 10:25 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > OK, I won't argue. So we need to rework utrace/ptrace in 3.0, then we > should do this again in 3.1. I'll try to do something. I have a thought here, I'm not familiar enough with utrace internals to know whether it is a good one or not. Originally, implementing ptrace via utrace was optional - if I remember correctly there was a define that turned it off and on. One of the good things about implementing ptrace-via-utrace is that they co-existed well - you could ptrace a process that you were also using utrace on. If I remember correctly, during one of the utrace reviews, making ptrace-via-utrace optional was requested to be removed. Now with the recent ptrace changes, still implementing ptrace-via-utrace will take some work. OK, so here's my (hacky) idea: (1) Forget ptrace-via-utrace. Have utrace be a separate thing. This way the recent ptrace changes won't matter. (2) But, what about ptrace co-existing well with utrace? Make them mutually exclusive - a ptraced-process can't be utraced and a utraced-process can't be ptraced. Assuming the above is a semi-reasonable idea, it might be a lot less work than updating the ptrace-via-utrace code to handle the new ptrace changes. -- David Smith dsmith at redhat.com Red Hat http://www.redhat.com 256.217.0141 (direct) 256.837.0057 (fax) From roland at hack.frob.com Tue Jun 21 16:33:37 2011 From: roland at hack.frob.com (Roland McGrath) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: David Smith's message of Tuesday, 21 June 2011 11:39:26 -0500 <4E00C93E.1030009@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> <4DFF80E2.6090602@redhat.com> <20110620172811.GA14970@redhat.com> <4DFF86DB.7090103@redhat.com> <20110620175234.GA15023@srcf.ucam.org> <20110620175513.GD19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110621152519.GA5557@redhat.com> <4E00C93E.1030009@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110621163337.4D4DA2C104@topped-with-meat.com> > OK, so here's my (hacky) idea: > (1) Forget ptrace-via-utrace. Have utrace be a separate thing. This > way the recent ptrace changes won't matter. > (2) But, what about ptrace co-existing well with utrace? Make them > mutually exclusive - a ptraced-process can't be utraced and a > utraced-process can't be ptraced. We had this situation before for a while. It has the substantial downside that e.g. you cannot do any system-wide systemtap tracing without making all strace and gdb use impossible. > Assuming the above is a semi-reasonable idea, it might be a lot less > work than updating the ptrace-via-utrace code to handle the new ptrace > changes. That's for Oleg to say. (Sorry, Oleg. ;-) Thanks, Roland From kmcmartin at redhat.com Tue Jun 21 17:05:19 2011 From: kmcmartin at redhat.com (Kyle McMartin) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:05:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ptrace: temporary revert the recent ptrace/jobctl rework In-Reply-To: <20110621152519.GA5557@redhat.com> References: <20110620160722.GA5994@redhat.com> <20110620160744.GB5994@redhat.com> <20110620161634.GC19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110620164423.GA7286@redhat.com> <4DFF80E2.6090602@redhat.com> <20110620172811.GA14970@redhat.com> <4DFF86DB.7090103@redhat.com> <20110620175234.GA15023@srcf.ucam.org> <20110620175513.GD19381@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20110621152519.GA5557@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20110621170519.GA2471@ihatethathostname.lab.bos.redhat.com> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:25:19PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > I understand. Once again, it was supposed to be a temporary solution > until fedora switches to 3.1. And the reverted code does not make the > real difference so far, the user-visible changes are minor. > Yeah, I understand, it just looks bad for us. > OK, I won't argue. So we need to rework utrace/ptrace in 3.0, then we > should do this again in 3.1. I'll try to do something. > I don't think worrying about 3.0 is necessary... it won't ship in anything, and we should be well on our way to 3.1 by the time we branch F-16 in 5 weeks, focusing effort there seems more sensible. (Rawhide will be changing awfully rapidly in the mean time anyway.) --Kyle From pradeep.chhetri89 at gmail.com Sun Jun 26 11:50:26 2011 From: pradeep.chhetri89 at gmail.com (Pradeep Chhetri) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:20:26 +0530 Subject: PROBING OUTPUT NOT COMING TO STANDARD OUTPUT Message-ID: Hello everyone I am working on using systemtap for probing user space applications running on some remote machine. For achieving this task I am performing the following steps: 1. In my development machine, I have the linux kernel version same as the kernel version of the deployed remote machine. 2. I am generating the module file from the script which is having the probing details as well as the handlers for those probe points ( for the user space process running on the remote machine) on the development machine using the stap -k -p4 -r /lib/modules/kernel-version/build/ process.stp -c process_name. 3. Then on the remote machine I copied the uprobes.ko as well as the stap_xxxx.ko file generated having the details of the probe point. 4. First I am inserting the uprobes.ko module on remote machine. 5. Then,I am running the staprun -v -v -u stap_xxxx.ko -c process_name. Everything is working very fine, except the probing result output is not coming to the standard output. Even the module is itself removed by the staprun program when the program gets over. I looked into the staprun and stapio code, what I get is that it is using the debugfs and relayfs concepts for transferring the data from the kernel space to user space.Can somebody please help me out. I think the problem is in this transfer of data only from the kernel space to userspace. Can I transfer the probing output to the dmesg log? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: