<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p><br>
      not sure which kernel parameter or libvirt option that would be
      either unfortunately. <br>
    </p>
    <p>If you or someone else can point to some clear directions I am
      still happy to help.<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/04/17 20:06, Joshua Lee wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CA+uM4wRnKO-fnBe0JQUHf7qOk7TfaEhCxyq5OG0wKj=vor2PcA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">If you get that running, run FIrestrike both
        "before and after" using posted interrupts for me... and show
        what scores you get, maybe some other benchmark like one of the
        ones from Unigine if you have the time.</div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Joshua
          Lee <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:joshua613@gmail.com" target="_blank">joshua613@gmail.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">I'm not sure, I know there's a kernel command
              line argument that activates support for it, then there
              might be something also within your libvirt XML and QEMU
              command-line?</div>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5">
                <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:00
                    AM, P. Pronk <span dir="ltr"><<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:vfio@pronk.nl" target="_blank">vfio@pronk.nl</a>></span>
                    wrote:<br>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                      .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                      <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
                        <p><br>
                        </p>
                        <p>With regards to your first question, I am
                          using an E5-1620v4 with X99 chipset but I am
                          not sure how I can check for you if the 16xx
                          supports this. Let me know if you would like
                          me to check something specifically.<br>
                        </p>
                        <p>Kind regards, Pim<br>
                        </p>
                        <span> <br>
                          <div
                            class="m_-8940190185187009433m_1230614543402891169moz-cite-prefix">On
                            06/04/17 13:18, Joshua Lee wrote:<br>
                          </div>
                        </span>
                        <blockquote type="cite"><span>
                            <div dir="ltr">I'm not clear if posted
                              interrupts, a feature of Broadwell-EP, is
                              available on both E5 1xxx V4 and E5 2xxx
                              V4, or just E5 2xxx V4? Intel's marketing
                              literature seems to stress the latter
                              family of processors as having it, but
                              reviews on sources such as Anandtech do
                              not mention anything but Broadwell-EP E5
                              Xeons having it in general.
                              <div><br>
                              </div>
                              <div>Also, a second question, what amount
                                of performance increase in GPU
                                performance could one expect for a
                                KVM/QEMU virtual machine with PCIE VGA
                                passthrough using the posted interrupt
                                feature of Broadwell-EP Xeons, using say
                                a 1620 V4, 1630 V4, or 1650 V4, assuming
                                those have the feature (if not, insert a
                                frequency-optimized E5 2xxx instead)
                                versus say a i7-5820k?</div>
                            </div>
                            <br>
                            <fieldset
                              class="m_-8940190185187009433m_1230614543402891169mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                            <br>
                          </span>
                          <pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
vfio-users mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="m_-8940190185187009433m_1230614543402891169moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:vfio-users@redhat.com" target="_blank">vfio-users@redhat.com</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="m_-8940190185187009433m_1230614543402891169moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/vfio-users" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/vfio-users</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    

  </div>


______________________________<wbr>_________________

vfio-users mailing list

<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:vfio-users@redhat.com" target="_blank">vfio-users@redhat.com</a>

<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/vfio-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/vfio-users</a>


</blockquote></div>
</div>
</div></div></blockquote></div>
</div>



</blockquote>
</body></html>