[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Annoyances] X-Windows Copy & Paste
- From: John Ryland <jryland trolltech com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, George <jirka 5z com>
- Cc: xdg-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [Annoyances] X-Windows Copy & Paste
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:37:57 +1000
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 07:02, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> A quick history lesson.
[snip]
> Moral of the story: to fix this kind of interoperability fiasco, you:
>
> 1. write down how it works
> 2. make all apps match the spec, not each other
>
> "each other" is a moving target, you get in an infinite loop.
True.
I have a suggestion. The selections thing seems wrong. Left click drag selects
text, no problem, but shouldn't copy IMHO. I don't understand why it is not
middle click drag to select and copy for this purpose. It would feel more
logical and semetrical with the middle click being paste. Might take a bit of
time to adjust (myself included), but left click select to highlight is then
non-destructive. I don't know the history of this but I get the feeling it
was a hack by an engineer, not a feature suggested by someone with any
usability experience.
Also there should be only one clipboard IMHO. Whether I select text with the
mouse or if I press Ctrl+XCV or Ctrl+Ins,Shift+Ins/Del, or right click for a
context menu, or use the application menu, they should all copy and paste the
same, period. It is madness to have a special copy which only works while an
app is running and have all these special hacks. Programming madness and
usability madness.
The only good argument I have heard for using the primary buffer for
selections is that selecting text would overwrite the clipboard buffer
otherwise, but as I have suggested, if selections are made with the middle
button, this solves this problem.
Comments?
Anyway, that's my 2c
John
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]