[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Annoyances] X-Windows Copy & Paste
- From: "Seth Nickell" <snickell stanfordalumni org>
- To: "Marko Macek" <Marko Macek gmx net>, "Mike Hearn" <mike theoretic com>
- Cc: xdg-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [Annoyances] X-Windows Copy & Paste
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:13:04 -0700
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:29AM -0800, Marko Macek wrote:
Hi!
Mike Hearn wrote:
The main problems with the clipboard IMHO are:
[...]
- It doesn't persist *anywhere*, meaning that if you cut something to
the clipboard intending to paste it later and you have a power cut,
it's
gone.
Well, for files windows does something different, it just marks the
file as "about to be deleted" and doesn't do anything with it until
it's pasted somewhere else.
It might be interesting to do this consistently everywhere, even for
text... There's always "delete" for actual deletion.
This behavior breaks the conceptual model of cut and paste. Rather than
having the clipboard be a location, it now is an abstract list of things
that can be pasted but haven't actually gone anywhere yet. This is a
less tangible model. The way cut and paste works with files is klugey
and is not a good pattern to follow.
While I would have no problems with a system that made the clipboard
persistent (arguably this is what ms should have done w/ the clipboard
except that the ms clipboard isn't a stack but stores one item), showing
shadows of "cut items" isn't so hot.
-Seth
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]