[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: XEmbed ipc semantics
- From: Navindra Umanee <navindra cs mcgill ca>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Andreas Aardal Hanssen <xdg andreas hanssen name>
- Cc: xdg-list freedesktop org
- Subject: Re: XEmbed ipc semantics
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 15:59:21 -0400
Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> wrote:
> Well, the canonical example in this area is Bonobo, a complete CORBA
> framework for interprocess widget and (to some extent) document
> embedding that uses XEMBED.
>
> But that doesn't really count as "simple ipc messages"
KDE has DCOP for simple IPC/RPC messages:
http://developer.kde.org/documentation/library/kdeqt/dcop.html
In KDE, DCOP is dependent on Qt but independent DCOP bindings for C
are also available.
An XmlRpc bridge is also available:
http://developer.kde.org/documentation/library/kdeqt/kde3arch/xmlrpc.html
For intra-process widget embedding, KDE has KParts:
http://developer.kde.org/documentation/tutorials/kparts/
XParts is available for embedding non-KDE widgets or inter-process
widgets such as OOo, Mozilla, ViM...
> (This is actually, I believe a formal description of something found in
> the KDE libraries; I forget the name of the KDE classes.)
Cheers,
Navin.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]