[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Clipboard/Selection Target Types
- From: Keith Packard <keithp keithp com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Keith Packard <keithp keithp com>, Lubos Lunak <l lunak suse cz>, xdg-list freedesktop org
- Subject: Re: Clipboard/Selection Target Types
- Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:51:41 -0800
Around 14 o'clock on Jan 4, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Windows is UTF-16 so some cross platform apps seem to be written with
> UTF-16 instead of UTF-8 at core. Of course the conversion is trivial.
> There is certainly some appeal to simply making all UNIX protocols use
> UTF-8 so only the sender not the receiver potentially needs to convert.
Yes, using a single encoding is very desirable as a simpler standard should
reduce the number of problems in each implementation, especially when
interoperating with foreign software.
UTF-8 has the advantage of being byte-order independent, which is highly
beneficial in our heterogeneous world, hence a better choice for an
inter-application exchange format.
-keith
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]