hi :)
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 08:32:03PM -0500, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> > Now, I am not so sure I agree. One reason it _is_ nice is that apps
> > that use HAL (like g-v-m) don't really tend to have state, because HAL
> > handles everything. g-v-m, for example, could be modeled as a FSM
> > without any storage (is that called a finite automaton?),
FSM is Finite State Machine, so no.
^^^^^^^
well ok, when you say that HAL provides the state, your program
could be part of the transition function in a big FSM involing HAL.
--
CU, / Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Germany
Martin Waitz // Department of Computer Science 3 _________
______________/// - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ///
dies ist eine manuell generierte mail, sie beinhaltet //
tippfehler und ist auch ohne grossbuchstaben gueltig. /
Attachment:
pgp00003.pgp
Description: PGP signature