[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: OT: xfs vs. freetype
- From: Andre Costa <acosta ar microlink com br>
- To: xfree86-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: OT: xfs vs. freetype
- Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 14:27:57 -0300
Thks, Mike, I really appreciated your answers/advices.
Best,
Andre
On Sat, 3 May 2003 13:15:25 -0400 (EDT)
"Mike A. Harris" <mharris www linux org uk> wrote:
> Upgrading random core operating system libraries like freetype
> generally will get you in trouble. There is no really good
> reason to upgrade it. Also, upgrading freetype would mean that
> your entire OS is now unsupported. Any font related problems you
> might encounter, you would have to resolve on your own.
[...]
> Our freetype is patched with a few things that are expected to be
> there by other parts of the OS. If you replace freetype, then
> you'll have problems unless you also re-engineer our patches into
> it. You may also possibly have to rebuild parts of the OS that
> use freetype.
>
> Although I haven't personally tried it, stock freetype will most
> likely result in all Xft using apps misbehaving. At a minimum
> though, you will lose some functionality.
--
Andre Oliveira da Costa
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]