[almighty] Code review integration

[Aslak Knutsen]

Don't listen to Todd, his answering in his sleep... :)

The main reason we moved to Reviewable was to keep track of 'unanswered'
comments during large reviews. I'm not seeing 100% how the new GitHub
review fixes this, but, the new GitHub Review definitely has nicer reviews
than before and with generally smaller pull requests I think we should be
able to use it with no problem.

My take would be; Let's try GitHub Review for a while and see if it works
for what we need. If not, we can move back to Reviewable later.

-aslak-

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Todd Mancini <tmancini at redhat.com> wrote:

> Yes, we should continue with our implementation. There are many reasons,
> but the main reason is that, although we are using GitHub today, the future
> plans do not require GitHub.
>
> Sent from my phone, so anticipate hilarious autocorrects
> ------------------------------
> From: Shoubhik Bose <shbose at redhat.com>
> Sent: ‎9/‎16/‎2016 2:57 AM
> To: ALMighty-public <almighty-public at redhat.com>
> Subject: [almighty] Code review integration
>
> Github has added new features for tracking code review , should we be
> continuing with reviewable ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> almighty-public mailing list
> almighty-public at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/almighty-public/attachments/20160919/443abbb8/attachment.htm>