[almighty] Multitenancy

[Todd Mancini]

It's not clear to me what URLs have to do with multi-tenancy. The VSTS
approach (which is actually one "org" per FQDN, but with infinite
projects per org) was chosen for technical reasons, not product
management ones.

So, do you have a technical preference?

The GitHub model seems to work well. But since we also plan to handle
enterprise SSO (via SAML, for example), the Gmail model also works well
(as far as PM is concerned). I'm not married to particular URL schemes.

Sent from my phone, so anticipate hilarious autocorrectsFrom: Max
Rydahl Andersen
Sent: ‎9/‎22/‎2016 6:24 PM
To: Andrew Lee Rubinger
Cc: ALMighty-public
Subject: Re: [almighty] Multitenancy
On 22 Sep 2016, at 21:08, Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Baiju Muthukadan
> <bmuthuka at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ALMighty architecture is going to support Multitenancy, right?
>>
> To the bone, yes.

what is unclear though is how the multi tenancy will work.

i.e. is it like github/jira where one instance under one url has many
projects with shared users/orgs
or is it more like VSO where each domain has one project with users
shared across many domains.

Eagerly waiting for some of the "new project" PDD/UX stories to actually
start getting that settled down.

/max

>
>> Regards,
>> Baiju M
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> almighty-public mailing list
>> almighty-public at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public
>>
>>
>
> --
> Red Hat Developer Programs Architecture
> @ALRubinger


> _______________________________________________
> almighty-public mailing list
> almighty-public at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public


/max
http://about.me/maxandersen

_______________________________________________
almighty-public mailing list
almighty-public at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/almighty-public