<div dir="ltr">Mickael et al.,<div><br></div><div>There are user-stories that have been moved to the fabric8-planner repo without being closed in the almighty-core repository: <a href="https://github.com/almighty/almighty-core/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Auserstory%20%22This%20issue%20was%20moved%20to%20fabric8io%2Ffabric8-planner%22%20">https://github.com/almighty/almighty-core/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Auserstory%20%22This%20issue%20was%20moved%20to%20fabric8io%2Ffabric8-planner%22%20</a></div><div><br></div><div>I would suggest that every user-story in almighty-core that have no further comment after they have been moved (ie, after Mickael's comment such as <a href="https://github.com/almighty/almighty-core/issues/638#issuecomment-271275690">https://github.com/almighty/almighty-core/issues/638#issuecomment-271275690</a>) be closed, along with a comment to suggest continuing the discussion on the related user-story in the fabric8-planner repo. </div><div>However, user-stories such as <a href="https://github.com/almighty/almighty-core/issues/639">https://github.com/almighty/almighty-core/issues/639</a> should remain open for now, since the discussion continued after the duplication. </div><div><br></div><div>In any case, there might be some work needed in the almighty-core repository in order to complete user-stories of fabric8-planner, in which case new issues will be opened in almighty-core.</div><div><div><br></div><div>What do you think about this proposal ?</div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Best regards,<div>/Xavier</div></div></div>
</div></div>