amd64-list Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1

[sunil kumar]

Plzz unsubscribe from the list. my mail box can't
handle the frequency of ur mail.
Do it earliest.


cheers,
suneel.












--- amd64-list-request at redhat.com wrote: > Send
amd64-list mailing list submissions to
> 	amd64-list at redhat.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	amd64-list-request at redhat.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	amd64-list-owner at redhat.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of amd64-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. [LATE POST-ANNOUNCE] ATrpms for FC2/x86_64
> (Axel Thimm)
>    2. nvidia-graphics6106 drivers rpm rebuilt for
> inclusion of
>       x86_64. (Axel Thimm)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:26:11 +0200
> From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net>
> Subject: [LATE POST-ANNOUNCE] ATrpms for FC2/x86_64
> To: ATrpms announcements
> <atrpms-announce at ATrpms.net>
> Cc: fedora-list at redhat.com, amd64-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <20040713152611.GC24735 at neu.nirvana>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Hi,
> 
> this is not anymore hot-off-the-press, but still
> kind of a well kept
> secret:
> 
> Courtesy of Heiko Appel, who made a Dual-Opteron box
> available for
> ATrpms, almost all ATrpms packages could be rebuilt
> for x86_64 by the
> end of June.
> 
> The few packages refusing to build natively on
> x86_64 are such
> requiring mmx (jpeg-mmx) or i386 assembly (clisp).
> Also check the note
> on apt below.
> 
> The packages are not in a separate distribution, for
> manual browsing
> they are side by side next to i386 packages:
> 
> 	 http://ATrpms.net/dist/fc2/
> 
> apt and yum repositories are similar to the i386
> hierarchy:
> 
> # ATrpms for Fedora Core 2
> # Possible sections: at-stable, at-good, at-testing,
> at-bleeding
> rpm             http://apt.physik.fu-berlin.de
> fedora/2/en/x86_64 at-stable
> #rpm-src        http://apt.physik.fu-berlin.de
> fedora/2/en/x86_64 at-stable
> 
> [at-stable]
> name=ATrpms for Fedora Core $releasever stable
>
baseurl=http://apt.physik.fu-berlin.de/fedora/$releasever/en/$basearch/at-stable
> 
> Note on apt: There are currently unresolved issues
> with biarch
> setups. If you don't need the grub rpm, you can
> remove all i386 rpms
> and apt will work. I tried an alternative approach
> using
> AllowDuplicates entries, but this did not work
> (AllowDuplicates on
> glibc makes the i386 provides invisible for apt and
> it detects broken
> dependencies in the grub rpm).
> 
> Until apt goes biarch, use yum or up2date! :)
> 
> Feedback on the ATrpms lists
> (http://lists.atrpms.net/), or the common
> bug tracker (http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/), as well
> as PM is welcome :)
> 
> Enjoy! :)
> -- 
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
>
/archives/amd64-list/attachments/20040713/4f8dcabd/attachment.bin
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:40:22 +0200
> From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net>
> Subject: nvidia-graphics6106 drivers rpm rebuilt for
> inclusion of
> 	x86_64.
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Cc: amd64-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <20040713154022.GD24735 at neu.nirvana>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Well, I could swear that the 6106 driver for x86_64
> wasn't there a
> couple of days ago, even if it says it was released
> two weeks ago.
> 
> Anyway, this is the first "common" release of the
> nvidia driver for
> both i386 and x86_64, so I merged the src.rpms and
> rebuilt new rpms
> for both archs (otherwise I would have to use
> release tag tricks to
> make the src.rpms for the different archs
> distinguishable).
> 
> I don't have x86_64 hardware with nvidia graphics on
> it, so I'd
> welcome any feedback on the x86_64 drivers. Thanks!
> 
> Enjoy!
> -- 
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
>
/archives/amd64-list/attachments/20040713/21400acf/attachment.bin
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> -- 
> amd64-list mailing list
> amd64-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list
> 
> 
> End of amd64-list Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1
> **************************************** 

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! India Careers: Over 65,000 jobs online
Go to: http://yahoo.naukri.com/