Samba Update

[D. Hugh Redelmeier]

| From: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at welho.com>

| For RHEL yes, but based on the version numbers we're talking about FC2
| here: samba-3.0.3-5 is the version in original FC2 and sure enough there
| is no updated i386 samba package in here:
| http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/2/x86_64/

I encountered this problem.  Panu: thanks very much for your accurate
analysis.

I've entered this in bugzilla:
	<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=132919>
If it isn't in bugzilla, it probably won't get fixed.  I think that
this is important since it blocks an update that fixes a security
problem.

Hugh Redelmeier
hugh at mimosa.com  voice: +1 416 482-8253

PS: I've learned more about "biarch" in the process.  Rather weird and
tricky.

It isn't obvious that a .i386. package on x86_64 would necessarily be
the same as the corresponding .i386. package in i386, but this seems to
be the case.  I inferred it from Panu's claim and from the fact that the
corresponding packages in the original distributions were identical.