Suse 10.0 vs. Fedora core 5

Tamal tamal.nath at gmail.com
Sat Mar 25 15:08:41 UTC 2006


Both was tested on the same computer with different partitions. Both 
consumes about 6.5 to 7 GB. But in terms of packages offered in two 
distributions, SuSE 10.0 is far better than Fedora core 5.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joshua Jensen" <joshua at iwsp.com>
To: "Tamal" <tamal.nath at gmail.com>
Cc: <amd64-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: Suse 10.0 vs. Fedora core 5


> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:31:48PM +0530, Tamal wrote:
>> Here is a interesting stat:
>> Inatallation time for Fedora 5 (x86-64): almost 2 hour
>> Installation time for Suse 10.0 (x86): just 1 hour
>
> You are comparing red oranges to orange apples here.  What the resulting
> size of the the two installs.  More importantly, do you have
> arch-to-arch comparasions?
>
> -- 
> Joshua Jensen
> joshua at iwsp.com
> Please consider contributing to my Marathon Run to fight Leukemia:
> http://www.active.com/donate/tntenc/RaceoftheJoshes 




More information about the amd64-list mailing list