From zation99 at yahoo.com.cn Sat May 6 07:32:03 2006 From: zation99 at yahoo.com.cn (JiaQi) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:32:03 +0800 (CST) Subject: problem on handling SIGSEGV Message-ID: <20060506073203.97112.qmail@web15710.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> I'm now porting a program from IA64 to x86_64 and encountered problems on the segv_handler. I used struct sigcontext instead of siginfo_t and wrote the function as segv_handler(int sig, struct sigcontext sc) but i can not get a proper failing address using sc.cr2. Could anyone help me? kernel is 2.4.22 ur attention is appreciated. --------------------------------- ??1G??????????? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jmacfarland at nexatech.com Sat May 13 20:26:14 2006 From: jmacfarland at nexatech.com (Jeff Macfarland) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:26:14 -0500 Subject: NFS server: permission denied Message-ID: <446640E6.2050000@nexatech.com> NFS mounts to a RHEL 4u3-64 server receive "Permission denied" errors. $ mount -t nfs -o rw nfsserver:/mnt/disk1 /mnt/disk1/ mount: nfsserver:/mnt/disk1 failed, reason given by server: Permission denied /etc/exports: /mnt/disk1/ nfsclient(rw,no_root_squash) /mnt/disk2/ nfsclient(rw,no_root_squash) Restarting portmap, nfslock and nfs on nfsserver have no impact. rpc.mountd _seems_ to allow it: (from messages) May 13 15:01:57 nfsserver rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request from nfsclient.domain.com:617 for /mnt/disk1 (/mnt/disk1) One peculiar thing is that the 'sunrpc' module is not automatically loaded on nfsserver after a reboot. Until I manually mount the rpc_pipefs filesystem, I receive "RPC MTAB table not found" (not verbatim). After I mount the pipefs filesystem, I no longer get this error, but I still cannot mount any filesystems off of nfsserver. mount -t rpc_pipefs sunrpc /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs One other piece of info that might be worthwile, every time I stop the nfs services on the server, in messages there are a few lines that look strange: May 13 15:13:12 nfsserver kernel: nfsd: last server has exited May 13 15:13:12 nfsserver kernel: nfsd: unexporting all filesystems May 13 15:13:12 nfsserver kernel: rpciod: active tasks at shutdown?! May 13 15:13:12 nfsserver kernel: RPC: error 5 connecting to server localhost May 13 15:13:12 nfsserver kernel: RPC: failed to contact portmap (errno -5). May 13 15:13:12 nfsserver nfs: nfsd shutdown succeeded Output from 'rpcinfo -p nfsserver' from client: program vers proto port 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper 100024 1 udp 32798 status 100024 1 tcp 32838 status 100011 1 udp 644 rquotad 100011 2 udp 644 rquotad 100011 1 tcp 647 rquotad 100011 2 tcp 647 rquotad 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs 100003 4 udp 2049 nfs 100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs 100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs 100003 4 tcp 2049 nfs 100021 1 udp 32799 nlockmgr 100021 3 udp 32799 nlockmgr 100021 4 udp 32799 nlockmgr 100021 1 tcp 32839 nlockmgr 100021 3 tcp 32839 nlockmgr 100021 4 tcp 32839 nlockmgr 100005 1 udp 660 mountd 100005 1 tcp 663 mountd 100005 2 udp 660 mountd 100005 2 tcp 663 mountd 100005 3 udp 660 mountd 100005 3 tcp 663 mountd Hostname resolution works from both machines and both are on the same network. No iptables firewall is in place. The nfsclient can mount nfs mounts from other nfs servers, but no client can mount from this server. Things Ive tried: Specifying the fqdn in the mount command Specifying nfsvers=3, udp, tcp Replacing 'nfsclient' with '*' in /etc/exports Restarting portmap, nfslock, nfs after every change Running exportfs -r after every change to /etc/exports What am I missing? -- Jeff Macfarland (jmacfarland at nexatech.com) Nexa Technologies - 972.747.8879 Unix Administrator GPG Key ID: 0x5F1CA61B GPG Key Server: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net From petitmermet at mat.ethz.ch Sat May 13 20:45:45 2006 From: petitmermet at mat.ethz.ch (Marc Petitmermet) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 22:45:45 +0200 Subject: NFS server: permission denied In-Reply-To: <446640E6.2050000@nexatech.com> References: <446640E6.2050000@nexatech.com> Message-ID: > What am I missing? Did you check SELinux? Regards, Marc From kalloltukai2004 at yahoo.co.in Sun May 14 18:34:46 2006 From: kalloltukai2004 at yahoo.co.in (kallol maji) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 19:34:46 +0100 (BST) Subject: fedora problem Message-ID: <20060514183446.49070.qmail@web8509.mail.in.yahoo.com> I' ve a machine with the following conf.---- 1 AMD64 bit processor 2. 80GB Samsung Sata HDD 3. MSI RS480 motherboard 4. 512Mb RAM 5.Sony DVD-RW 6. Samsung Cd-ROM OS-- Windows XP professional Fedora Core 4 (x86_64) ------ previously I ' ve previously installed Fedora core 4 (x86_64) bit version without any problem But recently when I'm trying to reinstall it it's not getting installed With APIC mode on....... while getting ready for installation it's givving "Disabling IRQ #180" After I disabled the APIC mode........ while installing the Sata_silicon driver it 's giving......... "Disabling IRQ #10" (most probably IDE Controller) I'm really surprised and tried many things but can't still install it . Although it got installed fine without problem at the first time.. plz help.........I've an exam in near future and need LINUX --------------------------------- What makes Sachin India's highest paid sports celebrity?, Share your knowledge on Yahoo! India Answers Send instant messages to your online friends - NOW -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jmacfarland at nexatech.com Sun May 14 22:18:25 2006 From: jmacfarland at nexatech.com (Jeff Macfarland) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 17:18:25 -0500 Subject: NFS server: permission denied In-Reply-To: References: <446640E6.2050000@nexatech.com> Message-ID: <4467ACB1.9040008@nexatech.com> Marc Petitmermet wrote: >> What am I missing? > > Did you check SELinux? > > Regards, > Marc > Not being familiar with SELinux, Im assuming the following means its disabled? $ cat /etc/sysconfig/selinux SELINUX=disabled SELINUXTYPE=targeted $ getenforce Disabled Thanks for the reply. From e2.bady at gmail.com Mon May 15 13:47:58 2006 From: e2.bady at gmail.com (Sebastian van Wickern) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:47:58 +0200 Subject: fedora problem In-Reply-To: <20060514183446.49070.qmail@web8509.mail.in.yahoo.com> References: <20060514183446.49070.qmail@web8509.mail.in.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4468868E.5040007@gmail.com> kallol maji wrote: > I' ve a machine with the following conf.---- > > 1 AMD64 bit processor > 2. 80GB Samsung Sata HDD > 3. MSI RS480 motherboard > 4. 512Mb RAM > 5.Sony DVD-RW > 6. Samsung Cd-ROM > > OS-- > Windows XP professional > > Fedora Core 4 (x86_64) ------ previously > > I ' ve previously installed Fedora core 4 (x86_64) bit version without > any problem > But recently when I'm trying to reinstall it it's not getting installed > With APIC mode on....... while getting ready for installation it's > givving > > "Disabling IRQ #180" > > After I disabled the APIC mode........ > > while installing the Sata_silicon driver it 's giving......... > > "Disabling IRQ #10" (most probably IDE Controller) > > I'm really surprised and tried many things but can't still install it > . Although it got installed fine without problem at the first time.. > > plz help.........I've an exam in near future and need LINUX > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > What makes Sachin India's highest paid sports celebrity?, Share your > knowledge on Yahoo! India Answers > > Send instant messages to your online friends - NOW > IRQ 10 usually is free. try a $ cat /proc/interrupts and 180 IRQs? are you sure? hand bady -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 256 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From ryan.w.frank at bankofamerica.com Wed May 31 20:42:48 2006 From: ryan.w.frank at bankofamerica.com (Frank, Ryan W) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 16:42:48 -0400 Subject: 32bit OS on 64Bit Hardware... Message-ID: <4751DCADA2CAED4BA5230AD48A9042A601575278@ex2k.bankofamerica.com> Hello all! I am trying to build a DL-385 with AS 3.0 Update 7 32bit... The developer specified he wanted the 32bit os... Anywho.. the box posts with 8gb of RAM. During the boot process I see the following message: May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-provided physical RAM map: May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f400 (usable) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 000000000009f400 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000f57f8000 (usable) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000f57f8000 - 00000000f5800000 (ACPI data) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fdc00000 - 00000000fdc01000 (reserved) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fdc10000 - 00000000fdc11000 (reserved) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec01000 (reserved) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fec10000 - 00000000fec11000 (reserved) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fec20000 - 00000000fec21000 (reserved) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 syslog: klogd startup succeeded May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee10000 (reserved) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000ff800000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 00000001fffff000 (usable) May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: Warning only 4GB will be used. May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: Use a PAE enabled kernel. May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: 3200MB HIGHMEM available. May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: 896MB LOWMEM available. When the OS comes up I only see 4gb of RAM. I am using the SMP kernel (should support 8gb), and as far as I can tell PAE is enabled... Checked in /proc/cpuinfo... I have even tried specifying mem=8192M on the kernel line in grub.conf... still no luck... I *believe* the 32bit OS will not see the additional RAM, I am just looking for any information that could point me to why so I can explain to the developers... -Ryan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From arjan at fenrus.demon.nl Wed May 31 21:07:59 2006 From: arjan at fenrus.demon.nl (Arjan van de Ven) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 23:07:59 +0200 Subject: 32bit OS on 64Bit Hardware... In-Reply-To: <4751DCADA2CAED4BA5230AD48A9042A601575278@ex2k.bankofamerica.com> References: <4751DCADA2CAED4BA5230AD48A9042A601575278@ex2k.bankofamerica.com> Message-ID: <1149109679.3114.80.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:42 -0400, Frank, Ryan W wrote: > Hello all! > > I am trying to build a DL-385 with AS 3.0 Update 7 32bit... The > developer specified he wanted the 32bit os... Anywho.. the box posts > with 8gb of RAM. During the boot process I see the following message: > > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-provided physical RAM map: > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - > 000000000009f400 (usable) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 000000000009f400 - > 00000000000a0000 (reserved) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - > 0000000000100000 (reserved) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - > 00000000f57f8000 (usable) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000f57f8000 - > 00000000f5800000 (ACPI data) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fdc00000 - > 00000000fdc01000 (reserved) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fdc10000 - > 00000000fdc11000 (reserved) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - > 00000000fec01000 (reserved) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fec10000 - > 00000000fec11000 (reserved) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fec20000 - > 00000000fec21000 (reserved) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 syslog: klogd startup succeeded > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - > 00000000fee10000 (reserved) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000ff800000 - > 0000000100000000 (reserved) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - > 00000001fffff000 (usable) > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: Warning only 4GB will be used. > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: Use a PAE enabled kernel. > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: 3200MB HIGHMEM available. > May 31 15:22:37 cltrsklccs01 kernel: 896MB LOWMEM available. > > When the OS comes up I only see 4gb of RAM. I am using the SMP > kernel (should support 8gb), and as far as I can tell PAE is > enabled... are you really really sure you're using the right kernel? (you conveniently cut that bit off the dmesg ;)