[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RPM Installation Ordering



mattdm mattdm org wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:46:12AM -0600, joseph r bezouska accenture com
wrote:
>> >> 1. glibc-common
>> >> 2. hwdata
>> >> 3. redhat-menus
>> >> 4. setup
>> >> 5. filesystem
>> >> 6. basesystem
>> Thanks -- long term, a custom CD is likely the goal.
>> Short term, it's curiousity about what is "sepcial"
>> about these 3.
>
>Simple -- basesystem requires setup and filesystem, so those go before
that.
>glibc-common, hwdata, and redhat-menus don't require anything at all, so
>there's no particular reason to order them anywhere special, so first is
as
>good as any.
>
>
>> Why these and not, just for sake of example,
>> say bdflush?
>
>bdflush requires glibc.
>
>
>--
>Matthew Miller           mattdm mattdm org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
>Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>




thanks very much -- this makes good sense.
some simple tests bore it out:

added the following carefully selected RPMs to
the 8.0 Base/Core install, making sure they were
on CD #1:

- modutils-devel  (req's nothing; nothing in Base whatreq's)
- gnome-vfs2      (req's the following)
- gnome-mime-data (req's nothing; above whatreq's)

[ BTW, great thanks to anaconda-runtime's pkgorder
  utility for finding this last one -- seems the
  only one like that on CD #1 besides glibc-common,
  hwdata, and redhat-menus -- better than churning
  manually thru comps ]

found:
1. modutils-devel installs (nearly) last

2. gnome-mime-data floats up and installs (in alpha
   order) first right along with the original RPMs
   of question:

     1. glibc-common
     2. gnome-mime-data
     3. hwdata
     4. redhat-menus
     5. setup
     6. filesystem
     7. basesystem


so, stuff with no req's and with no whatreq's float
down to the bottom (naturally), while stuff with no
req's but with whatreq's float way up to top (even
before basesystem, which I did not expect and was
tripping me up).

good that Red Hat Linux observes Occam's Razor,
though.

thanks again.








This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]