[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [PATCH] Do not show disabled repos.



On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:21:51PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 00:17 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > 
> > Also really the only time we can ever get testing on this is if it's
> > enabled on a release.  If we always say "oh it still doesn't work,
> > disable it for release" then we'll never actually get it into a working
> > state.
> 
> You can get testing on this at any time you want.  All it takes is a
> special fedora-release and a special pungi call.  These things take all
> of about an hour to do.  Or it you could have tested any one of the
> alpha/beta/snapshot/prereleases that had media since they all would have
> the rawhide box to check, which would emulate having the updates box at
> release time.
> 
> Claiming that you could only test at release time doesn't work here.

Rather than pointing fingers at each other, we should probably work on adding
this particular situation in to the F-11 test plan.  I'm sure the QA guys are
looking for some more work.  :)

> Of course, my suggestion of throwing it out isn't exactly helpful.  My
> patch tries to minimize the possibility of users shooting themselves in
> the foot for the F10 release, so that something better can be achieved
> in the F11 release.  It's really too bad we have so little options at
> this point, but it is what it is.

I understand what you're trying to do, but here's my mindset at this point for
F-10 anaconda:

   - Does the issue prevent people from installing?
   - If yes, make a patch, test the hell out it, have the team review it,
     get it in.
   - If no, it's too late for F-10.

Really, I just hate the last minute changes that we've done to anaconda in the
past.  There's almost always something that slips in at the last minute and a
new failure shows up and we're playing the holy-crap-fix-it game at the very
end of the release cycle.  I just want to avoid that entirely by sticking with
the blocker/non-blocker concept, so I just consider this one non-blocker.
Installs still proceed.

-- 
David Cantrell <dcantrell redhat com>
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI

Attachment: pgpkh4qnp5900.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]