[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [PATCH] - change our default partitioning scheme

On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 13:47 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> I don't believe we have the ability to express sizes of requests this
> complex, even after the thing I added in this patch. I also think this
> is a fairly difficult change to make - at least in a clean and generic
> way.

I know it's supposed to be a world of arbitrary LBA, but ensuring slices
(partitions) are on perfect cylinder boundaries is ideal, and should be
the default.  I guess one could give the option to use an alternative
heads/sector size in the "druid," but I'd default to what the disk uses
(in the case it does not already have a disk label / partition table,
which we already respect if it does).

On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 14:32 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 64GB is a (somewhat) stock SSD size.

Just remember that 64GB = 59.6GiB.  And then there are also spare cells.

Of course, if we're going to start talking SSDs, we should _avoid_
creating swap on a SSD while we're at it.  ;)

On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 21:04 -0400, Kyle McDonald wrote:
> I never understood Sun's use of /export/home

Whether it's /export or some other TLD than /home, the idea is to always
have the "source" located outside of /home, because /home may be
automounted.  To this day, I still use the nomenclature ...  

  /export/(server)/(resource) -> /home/(domain)/(resource)

The "server" in the /export source tells me the server.  The "domain" in
the /home mount where all the automounter maps for that domain will will
mount.  In the server itself, I will use a local automounter map with a
bind mount to override the domain automounter map that uses a network
filesystem protocol when the store is local to the server itself.

On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 21:04 -0400, Kyle McDonald wrote:
> but I found it useful to mount the remaining space as just /export

As a fallback, such as on any workstation, I just create (and bind
  /export/local -> /home/local

Bryan J Smith       Senior Consultant       Red Hat, Inc
Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/consulting
mailto:bjs redhat com         +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) 
mailto:b j smith ieee org  (Blackberry/Red Hat-External) 
You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100%  
no-IP-strings-attached, community software development.   
But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other      
software and services firms for their own, direct needs,
year after year?     http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]