[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Appropriate test priority for telnet and cmdline installs



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Chris Lumens wrote:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_Cmdline

As I understand it, the cmdline case is important for platforms that
don't support newt console output (e.g. s390x).  However, it's been
leveraged heavily by test automation as it makes for easier to follow
test logs.  This is a lightweight test for us to continue with, so I'd
be comfortable assigning this a priority of Beta.  Thoughts/concerns?

Agreed as to the users.  I'm curious why you give this a different
priority from serial console, though.  It feels like serial and cmdline
have the same set of use cases and should be tested at the same level.

Serial console installs can still be interactive, whereas the cmdline mode
requires a kickstart file and is really just a progress indicator (right?).
Despite being named cmdline mode, I'm pretty sure it's not at all interactive.

- -- David Cantrell <dcantrell redhat com>
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktwzqsACgkQ5hsjjIy1VkmvPQCgt14igl6bcuMa/aEtenu/N5l9
nLQAnRat0okzRT80/glPwUntdlNvc63N
=fJwg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]