[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Anaconda threads and Yum with rpm backend



>  From the "make it somehow work for F18" POV I'd guess the easiest
>  thing
> would be doing it in anaconda: unlike rpm and yum, it doesn't have an
> API it needs to guarantee for its users, and (because of that) its
> need

Yeah, that is probably true...

> for transferring state across the fork border is also by far the
> smallest of the three. As its AFAICT not doing fine-grained
> per-package
> progress meter any more it might be "just" a matter of pushing
> package
> names along with the total progress across pipes or such.

oh, but we still have per package progress updates and error reporting with abort/continue dialogs in case anything bad happens..

Martin


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]