RAID 0+1 using 10000rpm and 7200rpm HDD?

Chris Drake christopher at pobox.com
Mon May 17 12:34:57 UTC 2004


Hi Thorsten,

I'd guess that the cache installed on each drive will also have an
effect, as will the kind of data you're working with (I'm guessing you
have a good reason for the 10Krpm drives), so I doubt any theoretical
reply is going to match the "real" answer, which would only be
obtained from testing various scenarios - do let us know how the tests
turn out if you choose this path.

BTW - I noticed recently (using IBM's excellent "DFT" - drive fitness
test - disk, that identical looking drives with identical model
numbers can have different sized RAM caches on them) - and of course
that DFT tells you what the installed cache on each drive really is :-)

Kind Regards,
Chris Drake

Monday, May 17, 2004, 10:01:27 PM, you wrote:

TJ> Hi

>> RAID 0 (on Intel IHC5-R)
>> Western Digital Raptor 74GB 10000rpm SATA
>> Western Digital Raptor 74GB 10000rpm SATA
>> 
>> RAID 0 (on Promise FastTrak 378)
>> Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 120GB 7200rpm SATA
>> Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 120GB 7200rpm SATA
>> 
>> I would like to create a RAID 0+1 from this config but I wonder if I'm
>> about to loose on performances doing the RAID 1 between the two (2) RAID 0
>> volumes since the first volume has 10000rpm HDD and the second one has
>> 7200rpm HDD.
>> 
>> What do you think?

TJ> Read performance will be as fast as the 10000 rpm raid can read. Write 
TJ> performance will go down to the write performance of the 7200 rpm raid (or 
TJ> even slightly lower).
TJ> But this is only a generall answer as it depends on the speed of the 
TJ> individual harddisks. The 7200 rpm disk with higher capacity _may_ be as 
TJ> fast as the 10K rpm disk with lower capacity because the 120GB disk can
TJ> read more data per rotation (depending on the geometry of the disk).
TJ> 10000 rpm is a 38% speed increase over 7200 rpm, 120 GB is a 67% capacity 
TJ> increase over 72 GB. A portion of these 67% will go to more tracks/disk, 
TJ> but
TJ> it _may_ happen that the 120 GB disks are as fast as the 10K 72 GB disks.

TJ> Maybe its worth playing around with the disks to get the ideal 
TJ> performance.

TJ> Viele Grüsse,
TJ> Thorsten





More information about the Ataraid-list mailing list