The big dump
paulm2012 at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 12 02:50:49 UTC 2005
Huh, oh, no no, I was refering to the system I had been working on
being done with 3.x. Sorry I didn't make myself clearer. My bad.
--- Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich at gmail.com> wrote:
> Paul Moore wrote:
> > Thanks, that answered a lot of questions. I noted that it had the same
> > windows 95A type MBR as the system I was looking at. Unfortunately I didn't
> > get what OS it was partitioned with.
> Windows NT 4.0 Server. Blank disk.
> MBR created + disk partitioned using the NT4 Disk Administrator tool.
> Take a look at the screenshots, it's all there.
> > it was NT-3.x with 256 byte sector partitioning. Any ideas? This is
> > probably a semi-fluke (?). It might still be a good idea to add a parameter
> > to dmraid that says, if you can't get this to work and all your
> > partitioning was done with some ancient windows OS, try this.
> There's got to be a more intelligent way of doing this.
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
More information about the Ataraid-list