Checking support levels

[Daniel O'Connor]

On Fri, 16 May 2008, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> > ie it isn't really functional :(
>
> if you intend to only run Linux on this box, I would personally
> recommend you consider Linux's software raid implementation instead,
> as it is much more robust.

Unfortunately there are several failure modes that won't cover. Uou are 
reliant on your BIOS being able to boot the second disk if the first 
has an error - Murphy dictates it will get an error half way through 
loading the kernel :)

Still it's OK if you can handle downtime and manual intervention on a 
failure.

Unfortunately I haven't actually been able to install Linux on a JMicron 
RAID-1 system which works fine with FreeBSD & Windows XP.

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ataraid-list/attachments/20080516/ccbb4ef1/attachment.sig>