[augeas-devel] Bumping the ruby version for ruby-augeas
Pat Riehecky
riehecky at fnal.gov
Wed May 4 19:20:58 UTC 2016
Is there any worry about RHEL6 compat? Latest version there is 1.8.7.
I'm more or less comfortable with the augeas that is in RHEL6 today, but
I can't speak for others.
Pat
On 05/04/2016 02:16 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> The question was prompted by PR 6
> <https://github.com/hercules-team/ruby-augeas/pull/6> where I tried to
> cargo cult building ruby-augeas on OSX from the dotdoom fork - Travis
> fails on that change.
>
> For building on OSX, I am inclined to not merge PR 6 and instead
> document that you need to use homebrew and then 'brew install augeas
> pkg-config' to build ruby-augeas; at least that worked for me. I'd
> love to hear if that approach is bad in some way.
>
> For Ruby compat, I think we should stop building against 1.8.7, but
> still build against 1.9.3 and add 2.0.0
>
> How does that sound ?
> David
>
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Dominic Cleal <dominic at cleal.org
> <mailto:dominic at cleal.org>> wrote:
>
> EL7's using 2.0.0 though - so if you want to drop Ruby 1.x then I
> don't
> think that's a problem. The latest Ubuntu LTS also moves to Ruby
> 2.x by
> default.
>
> I tend towards keeping them until there's a reason to drop them, but
> wouldn't mind much if they were removed now.
>
> --
> Dominic Cleal
> dominic at cleal.org <mailto:dominic at cleal.org>
>
> On 28/04/16 23:23, David Lutterkort wrote:
> > Ok .. it sounds that we should still test against 1.9.3 then ...
> >
> > David
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Pat Riehecky
> <riehecky at fnal.gov <mailto:riehecky at fnal.gov>
> > <mailto:riehecky at fnal.gov <mailto:riehecky at fnal.gov>>> wrote:
> >
> > I would prefer to run against what EL7 ships. I make
> somewhat heavy
> > use of augeas internally, though through augtool and puppet.
> >
> > Pat
> >
> > --
> > Pat Riehecky
> > Scientific Linux developer
> >
> > Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
> > www.fnal.gov <http://www.fnal.gov> <http://www.fnal.gov>
> > www.scientificlinux.org <http://www.scientificlinux.org>
> <http://www.scientificlinux.org>
> >
> >
> >
> > On 04/27/2016 01:53 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> >> In putting up
> https://github.com/hercules-team/ruby-augeas/pull/6
> >> I realized that we run Travis against Ruby 1.9.7 and 1.9.3,
> both
> >> of which are EOL.
> >>
> >> I'd like to hear from people what they think a reasonable
> minimum
> >> Ruby version would be: 2.0.0 which is what CentOS 7 uses ?
> >> Something newer than that ?
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> augeas-devel mailing list
> >> augeas-devel at redhat.com <mailto:augeas-devel at redhat.com>
> <mailto:augeas-devel at redhat.com <mailto:augeas-devel at redhat.com>>
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > augeas-devel mailing list
> > augeas-devel at redhat.com <mailto:augeas-devel at redhat.com>
> <mailto:augeas-devel at redhat.com <mailto:augeas-devel at redhat.com>>
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > augeas-devel mailing list
> > augeas-devel at redhat.com <mailto:augeas-devel at redhat.com>
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> augeas-devel mailing list
> augeas-devel at redhat.com <mailto:augeas-devel at redhat.com>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> augeas-devel mailing list
> augeas-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/augeas-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/augeas-devel/attachments/20160504/29f5f769/attachment.htm>
More information about the augeas-devel
mailing list