memory for an LX164

[A. Devine]

From: "Juhana Helovuo" <juhe at iki.fi>
To: <axp-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: memory for an LX164



> For example, Kingston KVR133X72C3/256 (PC133) does NOT work, it is not 
> recognized by the motherboard at all. I tested this myself.
> 
> On the other hand, Kingston KVR100X72C2/256 (PC100) seems to work fine. 
> I tested this myself also.
> 
> The Kingston part numbers would lead one to think that the main 
> differences between these modules are the maximum supported frequency 
> (133 MHz vs. 100 MHz) and minimum CAS latency (3 clocks vs. 2 clocks), 
> but since the 164LX uses a frequency less than 100 MHz (66?), and both 
> of these modules should reach CL=2 at 100 MHz or less, the differences 
> do not seem significant.
> 
> Juhana Helovuo


Makes me wonder if 512MB modules would work in UP2000 boards...



Matt