Editor recommen dations?
text.tools at virgin.net
Thu Jul 29 08:22:29 UTC 2004
I have to say that Nano was not supplied though Pico was and I didn't get it
to do what I wanted. Which is the more advanced version here? is Pico the
advance on Nano in which case, downloading Nano would appear futile. I did
download Nano last night though not installed it yet. Am I going backwards
on this. I think it still seems curious that keyboard support is even now
not as complete as the other OS's after all this time. I understand the
need for a lot of these to be remote terminal compliant for folks accessing
the tools via a shell and remote terminal access; but desktop Linux is here
to stay and though that programs dedicated to this should be more common by
now. I did this sort of key handling when I programmed in Pascal under DOS
and got it more reliable and responsive than these.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Baechler" <tony at baechler.net>
To: "Linux for blind general discussion" <blinux-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 7:04 AM
Subject: Re: Editor recommen dations?
Hi. Is there any good reason why Nano does not work? It supports arrows,
Home, End, paging up and down, etc. I use it frequently. Sorry if I am
being unhelpful or if you tried that already but it seems to do what you
want. It is standard on most Linux systems.
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list at redhat.com
More information about the Blinux-list