pine; alpine, and re-alpine support status
Jude DaShiell
jdashiel at shellworld.net
Thu Sep 4 13:46:57 UTC 2014
Earlier this year I had asked administration over at panix.com to replace
alpine with re-alpine since re-alpine had later ongoing support than
alpine. Administration investigated and decided to not install re-alpine
since re-alpine according to them lost its support as of 2012. So for
those that want to be using a mail package with ongoing support in order
to benefit from security fixes and new features in future versions, the
pine tree and its descendants died off two years ago. Mutt has its
following, but another package anyone searching for a live one ought to
look at is nmh. The whole operating philosophy behind nmh radically
differs from pine and mutt though but won't pose any problems for the
dedicated command line users in the linux community. One security
advantage to nmh is no.mbox files, every message is stored in its own
file. earlier if you found a virus on an .mbox file, the virus program
(clamav in my case) couldn't tell me which message number had the virus
and didn't want to allow me to access that .mbox file either. That's a
good way to loose lots of email quickly. With nmh, each individual
message can be checked by any anti-malware program and deleting certain
infected messages does not loose you your whole email content. Due to
changing support status on software these days it's wise to understand
learning curves will be ahead as old favorites come to end of support life
cycles.
jude <jdashiel at shellworld.net>
More information about the Blinux-list
mailing list