a *very* odd question especially for me.
Jude DaShiell
jdashiel at panix.com
Thu Jul 23 23:43:40 UTC 2015
Each port on that modem/router probably has a single digit number on it.
That single digit is the fourth in an ip address that's ip4. The ip6
protocol is different. I know of two prefixes that have three digits
separated by periods. One of them starts out with 192.168.x.y and the
other starts with 10.x.y.z. Your modem/router will probably use the
first 192.168.x.yip4 numbering system to communicate. The x in that
192.168.x.y is usually the same number for all local connections on a
router too. A hint, power cords usually plug into the bottom of
routers; next in my case an external modem cord connects moving upward.
After that, computers connect. Numbers for computers usually start at
zero and go up to 3 if you can connect four devices to a modem/router.
I hope I haven't confused you any further.
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:52:27
> From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen at shellworld.net>
> Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: a *very* odd question especially for me.
>
> which is exactly what I said I was doing. I indicated that my modem/rooter
> allows for multiple connections.
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
>> If you're going from one of your computers to another of your computers to
>> get the work done that ought to be easier since all you connect to will be
>> local.
>>
>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:41:20
>>> From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen at shellworld.net>
>>> Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>>> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>>> Subject: Re: a *very* odd question especially for me.
>>>
>>> Hi Jude,
>>> I am not sure what you mean by a remote provider.
>>> Given I have an entire production studio, recording the material should
>>> not be an issue. also, it is my understanding that the various Linux
>>> programs for music work can recognize a device connected to the sound
>>> card, i. e. a midi cable running from a keyboard to the midi port on the
>>> card itself. The card is not doing the recording, it is providing the
>>> playback through the speakers. the software with the ability to
>>> recognize a four duplex card is managing the recording.
>>> All this is done on a computer sitting in my office, assuming a real
>>> Linux
>>> installation can be done with these goals in mind.
>>> All this of course assumes I am even on the same page as your idea.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kare
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>>>
>>> > The remote machine would have to record to disk its sound card output >
>>> for you, then you would need to download those files in order to listen >
>>> to them. Assuming your remote provider is able and willing to provide >
>>> you those extra services. They'll have to have a high quality sound >
>>> card installed and you'll have to pre-arrange with them when to start >
>>> the recording from the sound card and some means to let them know to end >
>>> the recording and sync their disks so you'll get a full copy of what you >
>>> recorded.
>>> > > On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>>> > > > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:24:29
>>> > > From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen at shellworld.net>
>>> > > Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion
>>> <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>>> > > To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>>> > > Subject: a *very* odd question especially for me.
>>> > > > > ...but what else is knew? laughs.
>>> > > How scriptable is Linux?
>>> > > Before the major players start on a roll, let me explain using the
>>> > > only
>>> > > functional way I can with the only operating system I use.
>>> > > *I do not have a fully functioning Linux box at all.* I believe we
>>> > > established this a while back.
>>> > > However there is a *single* task I may be willing to dedicate > >
>>> hardware
>>> > > to, if this can be done.
>>> > > I have absolutely zero interest in any full fledged aspect. if I
>>> > > cannot
>>> > > do this one thing the os has little appeal for me. after a good 7 >
>>> > years
>>> > > or so trying to get Linux going and not finding anyone local with >
>>> > the
>>> > > skill I respect others appreciation but I am not having this sort of
>>> > > experience.
>>> > > In the DOS operating system one could create .bat files that managed
>>> > > several tasks with a single file.
>>> > > the autoexec.bat file is a good example.
>>> > > You can create them with a text editor, no major complex commands
>>> > > required.
>>> > > If Linux has this ability, and I would be surprised if it did not, >
>>> > here > > is
>>> > > the situation.
>>> > > I am a professional singer. When I perform I use real musicians,
>>> not
>>> > > their electronic equals which means I require arrangements for them
>>> > > to
>>> > > play.
>>> > > I am writing a grand deal of material these days, and if I am going
>>> > > to > > get
>>> > > that material recorded I must do the following.
>>> > > 1 get the parts out of my head and into sheet music form, most
>>> likely
>>> > > using a well outfitted keyboard instrument's for part of the job.
>>> > > 2 confirm via playback that what I have done will sound when played
>>> > > as
>>> > > desired.
>>> > > and 3. get the material printed, or into printable form.
>>> > > > > Now, I know there are allot of command line programs in Linux
>>> > > distributions that can accomplish my goals.
>>> > > The problem for me is getting the Linux side of the computing > >
>>> functional,
>>> > > or at the very least, a way for me to ssh telnet into a box using my
>>> > > dos
>>> > > setup to run the programs themselves.
>>> > > Yes there is a question here!
>>> > > assuming I could get the computer hardware with the kind of quality
>>> > > soundcard to Handel the multiple-track playback, is it possible to
>>> do > > the
>>> > > following.
>>> > > 1, is Linux distribution is installed correctly in the first place,
>>> > > ssh
>>> > > telnet into that machine from my main one and
>>> > > 2, using scripting , assuming this can be done simply, create a set
>>> > > of
>>> > > .bat file equivalents to run the various programs I need from the >
>>> > command
>>> > > line?
>>> > > > > The other major hardware involved is no hardship. I have a > >
>>> combination
>>> > > modem/rooter which works with both wireless and wired devices and >
>>> > multiple
>>> > > ports for the wired connection.
>>> > > I share that because I know even if I am not running anything > >
>>> directly
>>> > > from the Linux computer itself, it does need an Ethernet connection
>>> > > of
>>> > > some kind generating some kind of ip for me to use for the ssh > >
>>> -telnet.
>>> > > again the idea is to do well basically what I do here for
>>> shellworld, > > and
>>> > > with other services.
>>> > > treat this box like a shell, ssh TELNET into it, run the scripts >
>>> > for > > the
>>> > > music programs I desire, and leave. The box will not even need > >
>>> speech as
>>> > > I plan to use it.
>>> > > Possible at all?
>>> > > Karen
>>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > Blinux-list mailing list
>>> > > Blinux-list at redhat.com
>>> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>> > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________
>>> > Blinux-list mailing list
>>> > Blinux-list at redhat.com
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>> > >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blinux-list mailing list
>>> Blinux-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blinux-list mailing list
>> Blinux-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>
--
More information about the Blinux-list
mailing list