Questions about setting up a new computer
Joel Roth
joelz at pobox.com
Sun Jul 17 22:27:02 UTC 2016
Hi John,
John J. Boyer wrote:
> How would I set up Debian so that it boots in command-line mode but I
> can start a desktop when I want it?
To keep access to your console, do *not* install a
display manager such as xdm, kdm, or many others.
Log in as normal on the console. When you want to start X,
type startx.
You may like to be able to kill X when you want.
Ctrl-Alt-Backspace is the traditional keycombination to
terminate X. To enable this, add the following text to the
.xsession file.
setxkbmap -option terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp
That's the place to disable the capslock function if you want to (CapsLock becomes Ctrl).
setxkbmap -option ctrl:nocaps
> Which desktop is most like Windows?
Can you be more specific about what you want
in a window manager?
gnome and kde are both huge worlds. I wonder if there
may be some accessibility advantages to the Qt toolkit
of kde. Perhaps someone has firsthand experience with it.
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/accessible.html
xfce has been considered the non-bloated DE, but that may
be no longer true. They are planning better accessbiility
in future. They use Gtk+, same toolkit as Gnome.
http://wiki.xfce.org/releng/4.10/roadmap/accessibility
What more do you need than an application launcher
or simple menu? That is icewm, which I setup for
my dad to use.
Do you need a file manager? Automounting USB devices?
probably xfce.
I personally prefer tiled window managers, use a key
combination to switch among applications that each get full
screen. I don't like moving windows out of the way of each
other!
> Right now I have a new VGA monitor for work with sighted colleagues.
> Would this be enough?
There's a push toward HDMI by the media industries, but VGA
remains perfectly adequate.
You mentioned Debian. You may also be interested in
installing a fork of debian with a conventional sysv init
system. They are also interested in supporting accessbility.
http://devuan.org
hth!
Joel
> Thanks,
> John
>
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 12:16:35PM -0500, John G. Heim wrote:
> > I was going to say the same thinga bout getting 32 Gb of ram. The main
> > reason most people get as much as 32Gb for their personal workstations is
> > for on-line gaming. Or if you are into creating virtual machines you might
> > be able to use 32Gb of ram. But here at the Math Department at the UW, the
> > only machines we have with 32Gb of ram are used for research like modelling
> > cloud formations. None of our web server, mail server, database server, or
> > file server have 32 GB of ram. I think you could combine all 4 of those
> > functions onto one server and still get by with less than 32Gb of ram. If it
> > was me, I'd spend my money on an SSD drive.
> >
> > As for the cpu, at the Math department, we have bought nothing but Intel I5
> > machines for the past several years. It used to be that Intel and AMD would
> > leapfrog each other with each new cpu release. But that hasn't happened
> > lately. I think the money Intel has been abel to spend on research has put
> > them ahead for good. I have a brand new PC on my desk at work but I turned
> > it off for the weekend. I can't see the cpu model right now but I know it is
> > some type of Intel I5. But the last 2 groups of machines we bought had Intel
> > I5-4570 and I5-4590 cpus. If you are doing something that actually will use
> > 32Gb of ram, you might get an Intel I7 processor to go with that. But again,
> > I'd spend my money on an SSD drive.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 07/16/2016 05:36 PM, Joel Roth wrote:
> > >Hi John,
> > >
> > >If you are working in the console, you won't generally need high
> > >performance hardware. If you compile a lot of software, or
> > >do disk intensive work, a solid-state disk is nice. I notice
> > >powerful processors make a difference in compressing video
> > >and any scientific computing.
> > >
> > >A big issue in new hardware is uefi vs BIOS booting.
> > >And in that motherboards shipped with the microsoft
> > >signed boot loading restrictions.
> > >
> > >http://www.rodsbooks.com/efi-bootloaders/secureboot.html
> > >
> > >BIOS has been around a long time, and easy to deal with
> > >in a linux environment.
> > >
> > >Have fun,
> > >
> > >Joel
> > >John J. Boyer wrote:
> > >>Thanks for the information. I had forgotten some of the Linux terms,
> > >>such as swap file or partition. How do I go about setting up a tmpfs?
> > >>
> > >>The installation will be command-line only Braille only Debian. I might
> > >>add a desktop later, but I don't want it to be automatically loaded at
> > >>boot time.
> > >>
> > >>What CPU would be appropriae. I would guess something recent, but not
> > >>the latest.
> > >>
> > >>Thanks,
> > >>John
> > >>
> > >>On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>"John" == John J Boyer <john.boyer at abilitiessoft.org> writes:
> > >>> John> I've more or less decided to replacer my ten-year-old Linux
> > >>> John> machine. It is giving error messages intermittently. Most of
> > >>> John> them are about sector errors, but others seem to have nothing
> > >>> John> to do with the hard drive. It may be more and more
> > >>> John> troublesome, even if the hard drive is replaced. Besides, it
> > >>> John> would be nice to get more up-to-date hardware.
> > >>>
> > >>> John> I'm thinking of getting 32 GB of ram. 8 GB will be for normal
> > >>> John> use. The other 24 GB will be in a ramdisk.
> > >>>
> > >>>I think you must have a DOS background here.
> > >>>An explicit RAM disk is rarely if ever useful on Linux. I'm tryinfg to
> > >>>remember if I even know how to create a block device backed by RAM... O,
> > >>>yeah, I can think of a way, but you probably don't want to do that.
> > >>>
> > >>>Instead, you probably do want to create something called a tmpfs.
> > >>>That's a filesystem backed by RAM. When your computer reboots all its
> > >>>contents go away.
> > >>>
> > >>>There are important differences between a tmpfs and a RAM disk.
> > >>>The biggest is that Linux will only use as much RAM as is needed by the
> > >>>tmpfs to store what currently lives in it.
> > >>>(You can set a maximum size, but with 32g I wouldn't bother)
> > >>>
> > >>>So, you can get the best of both worlds, storing your temporary files in
> > >>>RAM, but using RAM for RAM if you don't have 24G of temporary files at
> > >>>the moment.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> John> Do I need a paging
> > >>> John> file? 8 GB of available ram should be more than enough. The
> > >>> John> paging file on my present machine always shows 0 usage, even
> > >>> John> with only 4 GB of ram.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>Having a paging file has a couple of affects even if it is not used, but
> > >>>no, you probably don't want a swap partition or file (linux names for
> > >>>paging)
> > >>>
> > >>> John> How do I avoid setting up a paging file
> > >>> John> during installation? I'm using Debian Jessie.
> > >>>
> > >>>In expert mode, avoid creating a swap partition and if asked don't
> > >>>create a swap file.
> > >>>If you don't want to use expert mode, don't worry about it; having a
> > >>>swap partition won't be a problem.
> > >>>
> > >>> John> How do i set up the ramdisk? I want to assign the temp
> > >>> John> directory to it.
> > >>>
> > >>>I think the installer will do that by default.
> > >>>But in /etc/fstab you want a line like
> > >>>
> > >>>none /tmp tmpfs defaults 0 0
> > >>>
> > >>> John> It might be nice if the
> > >>> John> bin, sbin and usr
> > >>> John> directories were loaded onto it at boot-up.
> > >>>
> > >>>No need for that.
> > >>>Linux is also smart enough to cache files as they are used, storing
> > >>>copies in memory, so no value in moving them to the tmpfs.
> > >>>
> > >>>The file will be loaded the first time it is used.
> > >>>You could do that at boot for /bin, /sbin and /usr, but you probably
> > >>>don't want to. The reason is that the system is fairly busy at boot,
> > >>>and it would probably slow down things like bringing up your desktop and
> > >>>starting system services. The only advantage of pre-caching files on
> > >>>boot would be faster performance the first time you accessed a program
> > >>>after pre-caching is done. However you get slower boot times and slower
> > >>>performance during the pre-caching.
> > >>--
> > >>John J. Boyer; President,
> > >>AbilitiesSoft, Inc.
> > >>Email: john.boyer at abilitiessoft.org
> > >>Website: http://www.abilitiessoft.org
> > >>Status: 501(C)(3) Nonprofit
> > >>Location: Madison, Wisconsin USA
> > >>Mission: To develop softwares and provide STEM services for people with
> > >> disabilities which are available at no cost.
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>Blinux-list mailing list
> > >>Blinux-list at redhat.com
> > >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Blinux-list mailing list
> > Blinux-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>
> --
> John J. Boyer; President,
> AbilitiesSoft, Inc.
> Email: john.boyer at abilitiessoft.org
> Website: http://www.abilitiessoft.org
> Status: 501(C)(3) Nonprofit
> Location: Madison, Wisconsin USA
> Mission: To develop softwares and provide STEM services for people with
> disabilities which are available at no cost.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
--
Joel Roth
More information about the Blinux-list
mailing list